Jump to content

Theoretical: A more complete Prisoner of Azkaban?


SpotTheDog

Will WB ever provide the missing Prisoner of Azkaban recordings?  

19 members have voted

  1. 1. Will WB ever provide the missing Prisoner of Azkaban recordings?

    • Yes
      5
    • No
      13
    • Depends on... (explain)
      1


Recommended Posts

My understanding is that, despite the best efforts of John Williams, Mike Matessino, Jay, & co., the Prisoner of Azkaban album is not as complete as it could be if Warner had been more diligent/less stingy. Will we ever get a more complete album from La-La Land?

 

Edit: I just realized that next year is the 20th anniversary of Prisoner of Azkaban. Wow, time flies, even without a Time Turner!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jurassic Shark said:

Yes.

Assuming a Prisoner of Azkaban reissue does happen, do you think Stone and Chamber would be similarly reissued months before, simultaneously, or not at all? Those albums are pretty much perfect, as far as I am aware, but inevitably there will be people who missed out on the box set/new fans discovering expanded JW soundtracks years from now.

 

EDIT: For the record, I voted "no," but I'd gladly be proven wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SpotTheDog said:

Assuming a Prisoner of Azkaban reissue does happen

 

This assumption is how hopes are crushed on each new batch, when someone decides that a label has to be working to improve that product they did which wasn't 100% perfect.

 

Yep, I do think that if somehow proper elements turn up, LLL would take the opportunity to do another edition, but that it's most likely they are spending their resources on making other unreleased and unrealized projects happen, and not on exhaustively trying to improve upon a release that's only a few years old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Disco Stu said:

 

image.png

@filmmusic I'm going to hazard a guess that's a picture of a shawm player; the instrument famously plays in the Leaky Cauldron right before/during Arthur's warning to Harry. I don't know whether John Williams vetoed it or the source couldn't be located, but it has been discussed quite a bit in other topics.  :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SpotTheDog said:

the instrument famously plays in the Leaky Cauldron right before/during Arthur's warning to Harry.

It's been years since I have seen the film so I don't know what you're talking about. Anyway.

So, we're missing just one cue? Or more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Richard Penna said:

 

This assumption is how hopes are crushed on each new batch.

Hey, I'd prefer Goblet of Fire before a few missing Azkaban cues. Or a Desplat box set would be beautiful. I just think it's a shame that the studio couldn't (wouldn't?) locate its own music the first (only?) time around.

2 minutes ago, filmmusic said:

It's been years since I have seen the film so I don't know what you're talking about. Anyway.

So, we're missing just one cue? Or more?

It's not the most iconic scene, but it's been made famous by discussion on this forum about shawm music. The music itself is pretty distinctive, however. There are more cues missing for sure, some of which have been identified by name, but I do not remember them. Let me do some digging, I'll come back to my own topic more informed.  :lol:

 

Also, there are apparently several cues that made it to the DVD special features menu but not the soundtrack, and I have no idea how that happened. So technically to have the most complete score collection, you should buy a used copy of the 2-disc DVD from your local thrift store and play through the old DVD mini-games to hear the maximum John Williams content.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have no proof whatsoever that more was recorded. Off the top of my head, the only recorded pieces that we don't have are:

- Marge Points the Finger (original)

- the shawm (if only that stupid isolated concert score would leak)

- percussion overlay before Sir Cadogan (same remark)

- Sir Cadogan (film take) (same remark)

 

Is there anything else?

 

Also, I would not assume a re-issue is going to happen at all since the original set is still in print (HOW?) And it also seems pretty unlikely to me that a whole bunch of recorded stuff somehow didn't make it to Mike, who is as meticulous as we can hope for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's also the extra piece of choir at the end of Apparition on the Train (might be synth from the editors), the film version descending harpsichord accent at the opening of Befriending the Hippogriff, the film mix opening of Time Past with the ticking starting later, extra strings and differently placed reverse overlay...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would've been nice to hear that film variation on the opening of Sir Cadogan, for sure.

 

And believe me, I hate it when an album cue doesn't match the film, but I seriously doubt you're ever going to get a reissue which changes all of those differences. They're not really representing unreleased cues, just accounting for variations in how the film was mixed and precisely which takes were used in the film (and most notably, accounting for what Williams wants to be heard, which probably doesn't include sound guys' bits), and no speciality release is ever going to get that 100% correct.

 

Especially where Williams is concerned, I'll ask the same question I hinted at a while back: do you want a 'Williams approved', intended release, or do you want exactly what was in the film. We can't have both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Holko said:

There's also the extra piece of choir at the end of Apparition on the Train (might be synth from the editors), the film version descending harpsichord accent at the opening of Befriending the Hippogriff, the film mix opening of Time Past with the ticking starting later, extra strings and differently placed reverse overlay...

I'm pretty sure that choir is just a sped-up ending of Train To Hogwarts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Richard Penna said:

and precisely which takes were used in the film

Like what the new JP reissue presents? You know Mike even includes pretty much zero difference alternate takes just because they were on a bootleg, right? But sure, getting everything 100% right when the opportunity arises wouldn't interest him at all...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SpotTheDog said:

Kind of off-topic, but how was it decided that Shawn Murphy would remaster Azkaban and Simon Rhodes would remaster the other two?

 

Remaster? What are you referring to here? 

 

Mike received the original unmastered elements from the studio, built new programs from those, and mastered those new programs himself. The guys you mentioned didn't work on the box set. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jay said:

 

Remaster? What are you referring to here? 

 

Mike received the original unmastered elements from the studio, built new programs from those, and mastered those new program himself. The guys you mentioned didn't work on the box set. 

I'm most likely misunderstanding something, but this is from the official LLL description (bolded emphasis mine):

"Produced, assembled and mastered by Mike Matessino, all three scores were fully remastered from the original 5.1 and stereo mixes by Simon Rhodes (SORCERER’S STONE & CHAMBER OF SECRETS) and Shawn Murphy (PRISONER OF AZKABAN). For SORCERER’S STONE, the original analog master tapes were newly transferred at high resolution and the score was meticulously re-edited and output from the first-generation material for maximum quality."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, those are the dudes who recorded the scores back in 01, 02, and 04

 

The blurb is saying that Mike produced, assembled, and mastered the new set, using the original mixes which had been done by Rhodes and Murphy back in the day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Holko said:

Like what the new JP reissue presents? You know Mike even includes pretty much zero difference alternate takes just because they were on a bootleg, right? But sure, getting everything 100% right when the opportunity arises wouldn't interest him at all...

 

I'm just highlighting that getting everything 100% right in terms of the final intended score doesn't necessarily mean everything sounding exactly how it does in the film.

 

Again... I'd love to be wrong and a reissue happens which sounds exactly the same as the film. I just think on this particular project it's less likely to happen. PoA is a rather extreme case of lots of post-fiddling.

 

But my view on these things is that if given a choice between a reissue which corrects the last 2% of 'issues' with a prior release, or a brand new expansion, I'm going for the latter most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.