Jump to content

John Williams' 2nd symphony


Jurassic Shark

Recommended Posts

In addition to working for motion pictures and television, Williams made his mark as a composer of serious music. Whether commissioned to write them or done for other purposes, these include: Prelude and Fugue (1965), his Essay for Strings in 1966 and his Symphony No. 1 written in the same year, dedicated to his long time Hollywood associate Andre Previn (a second Symphony followed of which not much is known).

 

https://www.filmtracks.com/composers/williams.shtml

 

Is Clemmensen dreaming, or is there evidence of a 2nd symphony?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I find truly remarkable is that Williams’ official bio with the Boston Symphony literally states “he has composed numerous works for the concert stage, among them two symphonies, and concertos for flute, violin, clarinet, viola, oboe and tuba.”  The exact wording may vary between versions of the bio but they always include the “two symphonies.”  It’s been that way since the 90’s at least.  You’d think someone would have corrected it by now?


https://www.bso.org/profiles/john-williams

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I've seen bios that say two symphonies and a sinfonietta.  I think what it was is more of the 1986 revised version of the symphony was different enough that he might have referenced it as a new work and others took that to imply a new symphony.  Similar to how Prokofiev's Symphony No. 4 are two different works.  There is Symphony No. 4, op. 47 (1930) lasting about 22 minutes and Symphony No. 4, op. 112 (1947) lasting 35 minutes.  To most people these are two entirely different works though the op. 112 is technically a major revision of the op. 47.  But I think with JW, the challenge is these work(s) have rarely been available so other than memories of those who performed or heard it, we don't have anything we can look at.  He must not think very high of it.  I remember seeing it available to rent about 10 years ago but no sign of it anymore.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, as has been mentioned, people have confused the Sinfonietta for his second symphony for decades. Nothing to see here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 09/09/2024 at 11:32 AM, Thor said:

Yes, as has been mentioned, people have confused the Sinfonietta for his second symphony for decades. Nothing to see here.

 

Are you referring to the 2rd sinfonietta that no-one's ever heard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure there are still compositions from Williams' early life we don't know about yet (prior to his piano sonata at age 19), but a second symphony ain't one of them. Maybe it'll be in the Grieving book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BB-8 said:

It's just arrived on white colored vinyl with red and blue stains and is no longer the album title.

What number did you get? I got #13 for Call of the champions and #63 for Summon the Heroes. 
My white vinyl also has stains but they are more grey so it kind of fits with the cover.
 

IMG_4055.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, BB-8 said:

I didn't order the other one because I don't really like Orff and Vangelis...

 

The Orff is a horrible performance, but I love this version of Chariots of FireConquest of Pardise is nice, too.

 

(But most importantly, that album has a couple of Williams best pieces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jurassic Shark said:

You really think so?

 

I find O Fortuna surprisingly difficult to get right - most versions I've heard sound either too tame, too ugly, or too overdone to me. Jochum is still the one I compare all others against (the work is forgiving enough for 60s-quality choirs, as long as they sing with enough power, and his soloists are impeccable). But the Williams version is one of the worst I've heard. (I also find the Bernstein piece very hard to listen to; I'm sure the Tanglewood Festival Chorus has sung more serviceable German lyrics elsewhere).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Marian Schedenig said:

 

I find O Fortuna surprisingly difficult to get right - most versions I've heard sound either too tame, too ugly, or too overdone to me.

 

Yet you defend the lethargic, flubby JW/VPO Jaws. I don't understand you. 

 

:beerchug:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/09/2024 at 3:17 PM, karelm said:

Yeah, I've seen bios that say two symphonies and a sinfonietta.  I think what it was is more of the 1986 revised version of the symphony was different enough that he might have referenced it as a new work and others took that to imply a new symphony.  Similar to how Prokofiev's Symphony No. 4 are two different works.  There is Symphony No. 4, op. 47 (1930) lasting about 22 minutes and Symphony No. 4, op. 112 (1947) lasting 35 minutes.  To most people these are two entirely different works though the op. 112 is technically a major revision of the op. 47.  But I think with JW, the challenge is these work(s) have rarely been available so other than memories of those who performed or heard it, we don't have anything we can look at.  He must not think very high of it.  I remember seeing it available to rent about 10 years ago but no sign of it anymore.  

 

I tried to chronicle the evolution of JW's First Symphony in this article on his early concert works which I wrote in 2019:

 

https://thelegacyofjohnwilliams.com/2019/10/08/john-williams-early-concert-works/

 

As for the possible existance of a Second Symphony, nothing was really ever mentioned throughout the years about Williams penning a second one, so it's likely as others have already pointed out that the Sinfonietta he composed for the Eastman Wind Ensemble might have been considered a second symphony of sorts at some point by whoever penned some of the bio notes that were given to press, record companies, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/09/2024 at 3:28 PM, Jurassic Shark said:

It's not a symphony.

 

What's stopping him from proclaiming it to be a symphony? It's a multi-movement symphonic work that's much closer in style to a traditional symphony than any of Bernstein's or Copland's.

 

I've never even seen the Unfinished Journey documentary the work accompanied - the music can stand out very well on its own, with a nationalistic flair that one could argue was a nod to Sibelius' symphonies (especially No. 2).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.