Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Mr. Hooper said:

C'mon. Deep down, you know he's right. :)

Let's look at the positives: it's a better confirmation than we could ever hope for that were it not for Spielberg and Lucas stylistically dragging JW by his ears, there would be almost no music we love he ended up writing! :lol:

Posted

YouTube comments section: "Mozart, Beethoven, and John Williams!"

 

JW: "Film music doesn't measure up to the greats."

 

YouTube comments section:

 

image.jpeg

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Andy said:

It pays the bills though.  
 

Still rather shocking to hear him swing at ALL film music with the same snobbish attitude the Boston Pops probably gave him when he came aboard in 1980. 
 

I get what he’s saying with it being fragmented short cues versus cues reworked into concert pieces. But still It really doesn’t seem like something he would say. What have they done with the real John Williams?  


I think that, deep down, all composers who work in film have this insecurity.

 

Bernard Herrmann tried to champion film as the "great vehicle" for modern composers, but he was also trying to compose a great concert work on the side to achieve "legitimate" recognition in the concert halls, for which he'd be remembered.

 

Well, like it or not, we don't get to choose how we're most remembered...

 

For Herrmann, it's the score from 'Psycho'—and not his 'Wuthering Heights' opera.

 

And for Williams, probably to his dismay, it's 'Star Wars' (et al.), and not his violin concertos.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Andy said:

General Parker’s Arrival Not With My Wife You Don’t


Definitely the 'Imperial March' of short cues. :lol:

Posted

See , Copland and Bernstein were correct- he is NOT a Real composer!😎

No wonder the Boston POPS walked out on him over him programming his own music?

Posted

I mean, James Horner also used to say stuff like that. I imagine most composers, especially those with a classical formation, think very low of film music, both the job done by their colleagues and by themselves. 

 

They just don't keep saying that in order not to create a fight within the industry... But deep down, that's what they all think.

Posted
Just now, bruce marshall said:

Has Marian finished typing yet?

😁😉

 

Yes, but not because I managed to say everything I wanted to, but because what I did manage to say was already much longer than I'd like to. Williams managed to put all of that in a few short sentences (but see what came of that).

Posted
2 hours ago, Sunshine Reger said:

 

Williams' wouldn't be the first artist to be wrong about his own works of art or artform within which he operates. I really don't attribute much significance to this sentiment. I chalk it up as self-deprecation, or the inability of someone from within the "trade" to be able to step out of it and have a good perspective of it.

Posted
29 minutes ago, Sunshine Reger said:

John Williams combining classical snobbery and Hollywood cynicism and joining a cultural discourse not just on the side of Johannes Brahms, but Norman Lebrecht,

 

By Brahms you mean his comment about the War of the Romantics, and not finding Wagner very approachable? He himself admits his lack of grasp of German might have had something to do with it.

 

You also never know the standards of the production he saw: it would have been circa 1966 while scoring Heidi, at a point where Wagner was almost always produced with gaping cuts, and who knows the standards of the singing and playing?!

Posted
30 minutes ago, Marian Schedenig said:

Film music *can* be equal to concert music


Yeah, if it's reworked into something presentable in a concert hall...like, for example, 'The Asteroid Field.'

 

image.gif


 

Okay, bad example.

 

 

 

Posted

Even Williams speaking about affection being mostly nostalgia should be put in the context of what people he met on his path told him. If you are surrounded by J.J.Abrams-like figures, musicians during a concert tour telling you how your music reminded them of childhood, autograph-hunting fans saying the same... it might skew one's judgement.

 

It is possible that hanging out more with scholars, analysts, and other astute and erudite observers telling him otherwise with the candour of Previn and Herrmann instead would have swayed him on this point in a different direction.

Posted
24 minutes ago, bruce marshall said:

He is just being modest.


I dunno. The way he said it had the ring of truth. But he's so famously modest that we're having trouble taking him at his word here.

 

Also, what he said wasn't only self-deprecating—he took a deprecation on the medium as a whole.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Mr. Hooper said:

he took a defecation on the medium as a whole.


Fixed(?) :flush:

Posted
31 minutes ago, Mr. Hooper said:

Yeah, if it's reworked into something presentable in a concert hall...like, for example, 'The Asteroid Field.'

 

image.gif


 

Okay, bad example.

 

Not a bad example at all, because it shows the issues of both sides of the equation: Those (like Williams) who may consider it "necessary" for a concert performances, and those who decry it as pointless or inferior. I like both versions and I see the merit in both. The same goes for Adventures on Earth.

Posted

I checked if it was April 1. JW really said that? Now I'm permanently depressed.

 

Reminds me of that SNL sketch with Williams Shatner where he calls all the Trekkies at a convention losers and to go home.

Posted

:( why did he spend all his life composing intricate scores like that when he could have half assed it or retired a long time ago.

Posted
9 minutes ago, King Mark said:

I checked if it was April 1. JW really said that? Now I'm permanently depressed.

 

Reminds me of that SNL sketch with Williams Shatner where he calls all the Trekkies at a convention losers and to go home.

 

He's right though. Just lighten up.

 

How much film music have you felt invested in in the last 2 decades?

 

Virtually nothing in the great scheme of it, i wager 

Posted
1 hour ago, Mr. Hooper said:


I dunno. The way he said it had the ring of truth. But he's so famously modest that we're having trouble taking him at his word here.

 

Also, what he said wasn't only self-deprecating—he took a deprecation on the medium as a whole.

 

Perhaps his two strokes have something to do with this change of tune.

Posted

It also pays to say that there's some bias going on.

 

Classical music - perhaps moreso than any performance art - has the most selective repertoire imaginable. The extent to which we only remember the towering masterpieces - overriding millions is second-rate compositions and the oeuvres of entire composers, including some of the most acclaimed composers of their day - is astounding and helps give classical music this rareified aura.

 

But it had known just as much slop as film music has.

Posted

In the end, John Williams believes that film music is essentially little better than AI slop.

Posted
22 minutes ago, King Mark said:

:( why did he spend all his life composing intricate scores like that when he could have half assed it or retired a long time ago.


Yeah who needs any of this stuff

Posted

If he said this in the late 80s or the early 90s I'd have been like, huh, you wot m8?

 

But it's 2025, film music is almost completely shite and is about as tuneful as a fire in a pet shop, and John Williams has never been more right about it.

Posted
4 hours ago, Mr. Hooper said:

So, does that mean he was feeling an acute sense of imposter syndrome when leading some of the best orchestras in the world in a program of his film music?

 

IMG_7344.jpeg

 

 

- An Imposter's Life

Posted
Quote

Despite the acclaim, Williams is self-critical, telling Greiving: “If I had it all to do over again, I would have made a cleaner job of it – of having the film music and the concert music all being more me, whatever that is, or more unified in some way. But none of it ever happened that way. The film thing was a job to do, or an opportunity to accept.”

 

Is JW saying he'd prefer that his film music sounds more like his concert works? 🤔

Posted

The thing you have to think about is this: are his remarks upsetting to Steven Spielberg? Probably not. He knows JW better than most, and he'll have a deeper grasp of his angle here than we do. Moreover, in his heart, the composer knows his ethic and his contribution, he knows that he transformed these globally beloved movies he worked on and that they became cultural touchstones in no small part due to his involvement, his work. My own feeling is that even in his autobiography, he was flippantly - decrepit old man candour - denying his oeuvre's worth.

 

I saw him standing there looking all proud and happy in 2024, when they named that new building in Culver City after him, and that he had earned it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.