Jump to content

What is the Last Film You Watched? - Part II


Lurker

Recommended Posts

In terms of how the film is set up, obvious comparisons can be drawn to such movies like Syriana and Traffic.

I disagree. Syriana was about oil, Traffic was about Drugs (in a broad sense), Babel is about humans.

In terms of how the film is set up, obvious comparisons can be drawn to such movies like Syriana and Traffic. What made those films great where the characters. They were real, they had real lives, and they seemed to live in a true reality, not a movie reality. The characters in Babel, for the most part, were not fully fleshed out, and seemed unrealized. They didn't breathe, so-to-speak. By the end of the film, I didn't care much about any of them.

Well, you're on your own over there. Of course they were not fully fleshed out, we only caught a glimpse of their lives. But you do learn a lot about these cahracters in the film. I didn't expect to like the film or the chracters, but I was sucked into their lives. Adriana Barraza and Rinko Kikuchi in particular.

I don't know why, but the film worked for me. And I fully expected to be yelling this time of year about how terrible the film was.

Boogie Nights

Nice character-driven film, although I prefer Magnolia more. I only really saw it because it's the only PTA film (sans Hard Eight) that I haven't seen. It's good, but I probably wont watch it again for a while. Nice surprise seeings Thomas Jane though.

I didn't like it. Though I LOVE Magnolia.

I saw an excellent film I hadn't heard of before, Pierrepoint (aka The Last Hangman), as part of a British film festival going on here. I was blown away. It is a film starring Timothy Spall in a brilliant performance as Albert Pierrepoint, the most famous executioner in England between the 30's and the 50's, while pretending to the world that he was a grocer. Spall is spell-binding, as an executioner who sees his task as a sacred one, and insists on according all the condemned the utmost respect. That is especially problematic when he is hand picked by Monty to execute the Defendants of the Nuremburg trial.

A fascinating film historically, and a riveting performance and character. I feel the film throws in a stance about capital ponishment a bit weakly, almost arbitrarily, which felt kind of awkward. But still, if it ever gets to you, I highly recommend it.

***1/2/****.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Superman II: Donner Cut, Transformers: The Movie (New Widescreen version), Jackass Number Two, Superman Returns, Batman Returns, Terminator, T2, and T3. I plan to watch Memiors of a Geisha tonight. Got them all for Christmas and I watch one or two a week with my family. I love my 51" HDTV and HD-Upconverter DVD player. Now I actually like watching movies again! I'll even watch ones I don't like! Haha!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of how the film is set up, obvious comparisons can be drawn to such movies like Syriana and Traffic.

I disagree. Syriana was about oil, Traffic was about Drugs (in a broad sense), Babel is about humans.

I disagree with your assessment, even though I wasn't talking about the "topics" of the movies, but how they are constructed, i.e., multiple inter-connected stories being shown to you in bits and pieces...etc. All of those films are about humans, of course, Babel is topically about culture and language. Babel is no more about people than Traffic or Syriana or Crash. The difference is, I wasn't drawn into their personal lives, I didn't get to see them interact on more than a surface level. Even the sequence of events didn't draw me in.

What made those films great where the characters. They were real, they had real lives, and they seemed to live in a true reality, not a movie reality. The characters in Babel, for the most part, were not fully fleshed out, and seemed unrealized. They didn't breathe, so-to-speak. By the end of the film, I didn't care much about any of them.

Well, you're on your own over there. Of course they were not fully fleshed out, we only caught a glimpse of their lives. But you do learn a lot about these cahracters in the film. I didn't expect to like the film or the chracters, but I was sucked into their lives. Adriana Barraza and Rinko Kikuchi in particular.

I feel I didn't learn enough for me to care about them. The only person I really cared about was the Chieko character.

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last film? "Day of Wrath"... a Danish film from 1943. It was okay. The characters were all terrible people, expect for the young girl who winds up being condemned as a witch. Go figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Queen. Great flick, made my top 10 (which I then had to revamp) for the year. I really like Helen Mirren, but sadly, most of the films she does never make it over to mainland USA, but she knocks it out of the park in this film. It's not a movie about secret meanings or hidden agendas, no double entendres, it's simply a movie to be seen and heard. It's about the Royal Family basically losing touch and not being able to adapt to the changing culture or popular opinion. The Queen is the face of a long standing tradition that seems unmovable in its roots and its direction, which begs to remain untained by modern society, and because of this, there is a clash of styles.

I am not British, so I can't vouche for this on a personal front, but I certainly remember the death of Princess Diana, and this film tackles, centrally, the Queen and the new Prime Minister's reactions to this tragedy, and how they go about handling it personally and publically.

It's a sad movie in the sense of how out -of-touch the Royal Family seems with the modern English people, and their wishes and desires. However, it does not bash anyone. The Queen is not shown as weak or stupid, simply as a woman who loves her family, and honors her traditions, morals and values. It's just that things have clearly changed in the country, and the Queen, herself, has not. She is but one person, not a constantly, and quickly changing organism like "society".

Check the film out, it's great.

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw it a couple of days ago. Excellent film. ***1/2/****.

Let's see what else I saw...

The History Boys. Joyous film, very entertaining. Dead Poets Society, just aims to be lighter and succeeds better. ***1/2/****.

The Man Who Fell To Earth. A Mid-70's Nicholas Roeg sci-fi film starring David Bowie as an alien who comes to earth in order to save his planet, who makes a fortune, but is corrupted by humanity. Weird, uncomfortable film, but still, good. Bowie is excellent, I really wish he'd work in film more, he is a very good actor. **1/2/****.

Don't Look Now, another mid-70's Nicholas Roeg film, this time psychological. A striking film about a couple (Donald Sutherlan and Julie Christie) that recently lost their daughter, who go to Venice- him to work, her to get away. They encounter all kinds of weird things and people.....let's just say, it was a good psychological horror film. Nice Pino Donaggio score. ***/****.

Children of Men, again. I more or less stand my my initial views. It is a good film, well made, great cinematography, good acting...but the main story, the concept- it's just too simple for my tastes. ***/****.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That one unbroken shot in the car is nothing short of amazing. It's a long take, and everything's perfect about it.

I saw two films over the last couple days with stand-out acting.

The Last King of Scotland, with a bravura performance by Forest Whitaker, and a fairly taut movie from start to finish. James McAvoy is also great. ***1/2 out of ****

Notes on a Scandal. Terrific performances by Judi Dench and Cate Blanchett, in a movie that is packed to the gunwales with story and characterization. It starts out as one thing and becomes something else entirely. ***1/2 out of ****

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That one unbroken shot in the car is nothing short of amazing. It's a long take, and everything's perfect about it.

It has many great, long, unbroken shots. Those shots are probably the most impressive thing about the film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That one unbroken shot in the car is nothing short of amazing. It's a long take, and everything's perfect about it.

:beerchug:

~Sturgis, who loved the film

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A movie doesn't have to be a faithful adaptation to be good.

I know that. But in this case, they TRIED to follow the book, but completely missed the point the book was making.

I know that a non-faithful adaptation doesn't = a bad one, but this one was really, really, really bad. The equivalent of adapting Brave New World and missing the satirical elements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Patriot. Cannot be taken seriously on any level. That being said, if you don't take it seriously, it can be quite entertaining. Gibson is solid as ever, but the film is made by Tom Wilkinson and Jason Isaacs, who are just joyous to watch. Film looks excellent, as shot by Caleb Deschanel. Score is one of JW's most derided, but I think it is entirely appropriate for Roland Emmerich's sensibilities, and the love theme is quite pretty. ***/****.

Keeping Up With The Steins. Dreary, unfunny, cliche-ridden film about a Bar-Mitzva. *1/2/****.

Pride & Prejuidice. The 2005 film version. I was pleasantly surprised by this film in the theaters, but kind of forgot about it. Felt like renting it again. I was blown away, loved it even more than the first time around. Wonderful, wonderful film, filled to the brim with good sentiment and a real sense of love. Great date movie.

The characterizations are all wonderful, but, as others have said (and as I felt when I saw it the first time), Donald Sutherland clearly stands out. He is so likable and warm....the last scene in the film with him is one of most touching I've seen in a while. The joy on his face is fantastic.

This time I noticed the technical work that went into the film. It is very, very impressive. Costumes and sets look great, but that is to be expected. I hadn't remembered how absolutely stunning the film looked, especially with DVD sharpness. Cinematography is phenominal, not only in color palette and lighting, but in the framing. The camera captures the movement perfectly, and is so sure-handed. That, in general is the feel I got off the movie- sure-handed. It is a solid, tight film, and feels as if it was shot by an experienced director for British dramas, not a (relative) newcomer with nothing else notable to his name. Quite impressive.

And mention must go to Dario Marrianelli's score. It is quite lovely, luscious, and changes from grand gestures to intimate moments very nicely, with the lovely dance pieces.

Wonderful film. ***1/2/****.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Patriot. Cannot be taken seriously on any level. That being said, if you don't take it seriously, it can be quite entertaining.

You gotta love the token black guy they put in there....

One of the many laughable elements in there. I find it rather sad that on the commentary, Dean Devlin is sure this is a masterpiece, where everything is so perfect and poignant, including the token black guy. He does like the score a great deal, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pride & Prejuidice. The 2005 film version. I was pleasantly surprised by this film in the theaters, but kind of forgot about it. Felt like renting it again. I was blown away, loved it even more than the first time around. Wonderful, wonderful film, filled to the brim with good sentiment and a real sense of love. Great date movie.

The characterizations are all wonderful, but, as others have said (and as I felt when I saw it the first time), Donald Sutherland clearly stands out. He is so likable and warm....the last scene in the film with him is one of most touching I've seen in a while. The joy on his face is fantastic.

This time I noticed the technical work that went into the film. It is very, very impressive. Costumes and sets look great, but that is to be expected. I hadn't remembered how absolutely stunning the film looked, especially with DVD sharpness. Cinematography is phenominal, not only in color palette and lighting, but in the framing. The camera captures the movement perfectly, and is so sure-handed. That, in general is the feel I got off the movie- sure-handed. It is a solid, tight film, and feels as if it was shot by an experienced director for British dramas, not a (relative) newcomer with nothing else notable to his name. Quite impressive.

And mention must go to Dario Marrianelli's score. It is quite lovely, luscious, and changes from grand gestures to intimate moments very nicely, with the lovely dance pieces.

Wonderful film. ***1/2/****.

I've also seen it twice now, and so far, it does get better every time. And the camera work is awesome. Great lighting, and there's some wonderful long unbroken steadicam shots in the film. The ball sequence about halfway through the film for instance features a three-minute shot tracking through all the rooms and touching upon all the characters. Great stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw Red Eye tonight, and I got skeered.

it was a fun movie, pure popcorn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For Your Eyes Only

Definately better than Moonraker, that's for sure. I never knew Conti did a Bond score, and I'm not really sure what he was thinking. A lot of the score seemed strange and out of place to me. Other than that, not a bad movie. I wanted to kill Bibi throughout most of the film, but I enjoyed it nonetheless. B

~Sturgis, who recognized Julian Glover from Last Crusade

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Week 4:

26. Ronin (1995)

This movie consistently pops up in greatest-car-chase lists. The car chases are indeed spectacularly done, but this is not really the first action movie I'd watch. While it is of course commendable that the movie goes more for character and plot than random explosions, it is also a pity that the characters are not particularly engaging, and the plot a tangled mess of the unexplained. Decent flick, featuring spectacular car chases indeed, but not one I think will have a whole lot of replays.

27. The Iron Giant (1999)

All hail Brad Bird! I absolutely love this film to death. Probably one of my all-time favorites. An endearing story made with a lot of love. Great animation, and thank god it doesn't have fluffy sidekicks. Awesome!

28. Fight Club (1999)

Excellent film. Fincher is clearly present throughout, and the leads give great performances. Pitt is hilarious at times. Helena Bonham Carter has what is probably a really misunderstood role, as most of her character's reactions don't even become clear until you see the film a second time. Great film, and a visual feast.

29. Sin City (2005)

That nice shiny-looking 2-disc set finally found its way into my collection (despite lacking several features, including subtitles on the extras and discrete surround on the extended segments). I don't care much for the characters and their stories, but I liked the film a whole lot better this time nevertheless. It's visually stunning of course, but most of it is rather ludicrous. It's a testament to Rodriguez' talent as a filmmaker that he pulls these tales off so well. While I felt this was overrated at the time, you really could do worse than to watch Sin City.

30. V for Vendetta (2006)

Hard to believe this was only widely released somewhere around May of last year. This long held a #1 position for me as favorite major film of 2006 (only to be unthroned by Casino Royale in late November), and I've seen it three times now. Well made, but from what I understand the comic was published in episodes, and this sometimes seems to carry over to the film (although I have not read the comic; perhaps someone who has can fill me in). It works both as entertainment and as a film carrying a (political) message, which is a rare thing at this quality these days. I regret I didn't see this film when it came out, even moreso when it was showing in IMAX not far from where I went to school. Oh well. At least now I have it on DVD, and it still rocks.

31. Little Miss Sunshine (2006)

Very nice comedy, but it's not the kind of film I'd throw an Oscar at. It's definitely good, though, with a great cast.

32. Ober (2006)

Alex van Warmerdam's latest film again takes a trip into the absurd, when a fictional waiter named Edgar (played by van Warmerdam himself) clashes with his screenwriter, who makes his life increasingly miserable. Some of the situations Edgar finds himself in are hilariously miserable, and there's some fun gags that echo throughout the film. I enjoyed this even more than I expected. Definitely recommended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice collection of films, that is. I was pretty bored by #26. #27 is wonderful (great voice acting, and I love that score!). #28 I gotta see again. I love it every time I see it, but forget why that is. I loved #29, even though it took a couple of viewings. The comic book feel is fantastic, looks great , I love the score within the film, perfromances are good. But mroe than anything, I loved how the film lived up to it's title. You really felt like this was a city of Sin, a point highlighted by the opening and closing (My favorite parts of hte film are easily the first and last 3 minutes of it). #30 was for a while my favorite of the year as well, and I still love it, after 5 viewings. It is not perfect, certainly has some rather painful moments (all of them with Portman), but it is an exhilirarting, exciting, and entertaining film. I think they captured perfectly this totalitarian society, which many films try, but I felt they really nailed every aspect of it. And I loved all the analogies between real elements in our world, past and present. Good score, too ('Evy Reborn' is magnificent). #31 was a wonderful, cuddly film. Good score to that one too. Haven't seen #32.

I saw The Persuit of Happiness. Your typical feel good film, but, hey, the formula works. Smith and his kid are good, as are the bigwigs at the Broker's firm. I couldn't help but like the guy, and smiled at the end....your typical Hollywood product. Certainly not essential viewing, but not a bad date film. ***/****.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happyness, actually.....

Well, seeing as I am not now, nor ever have been inclined to misspell, I naturally spelled the word correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26. Ronin (1995)

This movie consistently pops up in greatest-car-chase lists. The car chases are indeed spectacularly done, but this is not really the first action movie I'd watch. While it is of course commendable that the movie goes more for character and plot than random explosions, it is also a pity that the characters are not particularly engaging, and the plot a tangled mess of the unexplained.

The twist at the end means the entire plot was irrelevant. That really annoyed me the first time, but the second time I rather enjoyed it.

29. Sin City (2005)

That nice shiny-looking 2-disc set finally found its way into my collection (despite lacking several features, including subtitles on the extras and discrete surround on the extended segments). I don't care much for the characters and their stories, but I liked the film a whole lot better this time nevertheless. It's visually stunning of course, but most of it is rather ludicrous. It's a testament to Rodriguez' talent as a filmmaker that he pulls these tales off so well. While I felt this was overrated at the time, you really could do worse than to watch Sin City.

I agree entirely.

30. V for Vendetta (2006)

Hard to believe this was only widely released somewhere around May of last year. This long held a #1 position for me as favorite major film of 2006 (only to be unthroned by Casino Royale in late November), and I've seen it three times now. Well made, but from what I understand the comic was published in episodes, and this sometimes seems to carry over to the film (although I have not read the comic; perhaps someone who has can fill me in). It works both as entertainment and as a film carrying a (political) message, which is a rare thing at this quality these days. I regret I didn't see this film when it came out, even moreso when it was showing in IMAX not far from where I went to school. Oh well. At least now I have it on DVD, and it still rocks.

Don't agree at all, I hated that film in the cinema, and I still hate it now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The film raised a few interesting issues, but was so busy with turning the graphic novel into a popcorn thing, that it became almost laughable and naive in the end. The book was way more darker and wasn't a superhero story at all. The resolution was ambiguous at best and didn't even try to wrap things in as simple and clean way as they did in a film. It wasn't plain bad, but Wachowski's obviously didn't get the point. The book was about anarchy and fascism. And you couldn't do that in a piece of pure entertainment.

Karol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't read the book/graphic novel, so I can't say, but I agree with your points about the film.

I had the same problem with Children of Men - they just completely failed to "get" the point of the book. I don't mean they changed it - they TRIED to translate the message of the book as it is, but they failed miserably IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The film raised a few interesting issues, but was so busy with turning the graphic novel into a popcorn thing, that it became almost laughable and naive in the end. The book was way more darker and wasn't a superhero story at all. The resolution was ambiguous at best and didn't even try to wrap things in as simple and clean way as they did in a film. It wasn't plain bad, but Wachowski's obviously didn't get the point. The book was about anarchy and fascism. And you couldn't do that in a piece of pure entertainment.

Karol

I can understand that, but I still think that it was a good film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Films I've seen this week:

Apollo 13. Only recently did I really notice how good this movie really is, and this last time it was better than ever. A very impressive film. Howard did a great job, I am in awe of how he managed to make thing that might otherwise seem not too interesting and make them riveting. I mean, one of the most exciting bits in the film is when you have a dozen guys working out a math problem. That's filmmaking. VFX are truely awe inspiring, and one does really believe they are in space. Acting is excellent, particularly notable is Ed Harris. Score is magnificent. It's not all that evident in the bulk of the film, but the launch and splash down are two of the best cues ever. And the end credits are great as well.

Great film. ****/****.

I also saw the film that against all expectations stole Apollo 13's thunder at the oscars....Braveheart. No matter how many times I see it, I still love it. Drags a bit towards the end (the Sophie Marceau scenes), but well paced aside from that. I watched the film just for the fun of it, for the bits of pieces I loved (Hamish and his father, the mad Irishman, some of the battle field antics- the scene with the Irish soldiers is priceless), and for the score, which is IMO Horner's crowning achievement. ****/****.

Kramer Vs. Kramer. Fine film. Hoffman is in top form, the kid is excellent, Streep is unlikable, but very good. There are some really powerful looks and moments in the film, the last couple of lines are a wonderful way to end it. Music is a bit curious, I don't know why they chose Mendellson's Mandolin concerto. Good movie. ***1/2/****.

The Motorcycle Diaries. Not uninteresting, but not quite as fascinating as it should have been, IMO. Acting is good, and the overall humanitarian message is nice, but it is clouded by the knowledge of the future of the main character. Santaollala's score was fine, appropriate, but the final cue, over the closing montage and end credits is excellent. That montage is very very interesting, as you'd think you'd have still B&W photos, but they give us still people shot on video, and the effect is chilling. And the music is excellent, but when it gets to one of the men on screen, a farmer standing near his horse, it kicks into high gear, and it almost drove me to tears. That music shift put against this farmer, who seems to have the saddest face ever affected me more than anything in the film proper. ***/****.

Alpha Dog. Surprisingly not a bad film. Always intersting, with some genuinely affecting moments. Acting is good, and coming from rather surprising people. Sharon Stone was bad as usual, Bruce Willis was just boring, but Justin Timberlake was excellent. And I loved Ben Foster manic performance. Brought back fond memory of Ben Kingsley in Sexy Beast. What a strange world we live in. **1/2/****.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zwartboek (Blackbook) directed by Hollands answer to me....Paul Verhoeven.

The best movie Verhoeven has done for ages. Double-crossing...Dutch style.

We're not gonna wait another 6 years for another movie, Paul.

Beatrix forbids it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw Blood Diamond. I didn't like it. Didn't tell me anything new or shocking, was slow and overlong, the characters were mostly paper-thin. DiCaprio and Honsou do a fine job cooncidering the characters, but nothing phenominal. Honsou was better in Amistad and In America, and DiCaprio was better in other things, The Departed being one of them. Score was ok, nothing spectacular, exactly what I expected from Howard. Cinematography is a bit underwhelming, I wish Zwick would stick with John Toll.

Well meaning, but not good film. Zwick should either start making good films that really have something new to say, or he should get off his high horse, of his films having great consience. His films are hit and miss, and they always contain some terrible Box Office-oriented choice that sinks a lot of the good stuff in it. A highly forgettable film. **/****.

Also saw Gladiator again. I guess it started at a disatvantage, as I had just been watching Rome, but still. Man, the film just gets worse and worse each time I see it. Gloomy, uninteresting, with a cast of uninvolving characters (only exception is Marcus Aurelius). People complain about Kaminski's dark and ugly looking films, but they never mention this unattractive film. A lot of the Effects are quite bad, as well. The shots inside the collosseum look great, but the streets of Rome shown during Commodus's entrance to Rome look so fake and unconvincing....someone was very cheap, making them all grey and overcast. Juaqin Phoenix is terribley wrong for the part, try as he may. Crowe is good, but the character is so boring. Only good things in the film: Richard Harris, the first big Gladiator fight in Rome, elements of the opening battle, and the score.

**/****.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw the first two Die Hards. Absolutely loved the first one, fantastic action and nice performances from Willis and Rickman. Couldn't really say much about the score. The second one I thought was simply alright. The villain wasn't imposing at all, almost all of the secondary characters were painful to watch (Head cop, the one tower assistant who knows how to fix everything, the janitor who is oblivious to everything), only thing worth it was Willis. I've already said my views on the third Die Hard (Jeremy Irons=Awesome).

Making my way through Rome a second time now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

L.A. Confidential. Not sure how I felt about this one. I found it hard to follow-a lot of people, many involved in sordid affairs. In spite of that, all the layers built up to an ultimately satisfying climax. I was particularly impressed with the period look-the clothing, hairstyles, dress, even the architecture and set design. All of this contributed to the feel of the film. I thought the script was somewhat awkward-I don't like profanity in general and here it seemed to be "out there", for shock value or just for it's very presence. Performances were generally good, particularly Russell Crowe and Kevin Spacey. James Cromwell's Irish accent seemed to come and go but his presence masked that particular defect. Guy Pearce just didn't do it for me. And the score-fantastic. Jerry Goldsmith, a composer I am not especially familiar with (raises hands to ward off the blows) really did a great job with this one. Very subliminal music-felt before it is heard, much like Williams' work in War of the Worlds. The "noirish" trumpet solos were a nice touch, the low, rumbling piano writing was simply stunning, and his electronics were tastefully integrated into the orchestral texture. I would have to watch the film again to form a final opinion on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liking The Patriot is like saying you like herpes!

I like The Patriot and I don't like herpes. It wasn't in Braveheart's league, but it was a good (though not great) 2 hours of entertainment. It also had one of myall-time favorite movie quotes in it.

Also, to add another movie to my "last watched" list, the latest is a new release: One Night With The King. That was a very good movie! I'd recommend it to all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw the first two Die Hards. Absolutely loved the first one, fantastic action and nice performances from Willis and Rickman. Couldn't really say much about the score. The second one I thought was simply alright. The villain wasn't imposing at all, almost all of the secondary characters were painful to watch (Head cop, the one tower assistant who knows how to fix everything, the janitor who is oblivious to everything), only thing worth it was Willis. I've already said my views on the third Die Hard (Jeremy Irons=Awesome).

First one is great fun. Second is good fun. Third one is great fun. I'd personally take Irons over Rickman (I'm more fond of him in Robin Hood, any way).

Making my way through Rome a second time now

I just finished my first run-through. Marvelous. Sure, I've got some nitpicks, but, overall, marvelous.

Morlock- who's favorite character is, strangely enough, Posca.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It also had one of myall-time favorite movie quotes in it.

Now I'm curious... What quote Chris?

"Tell me, sir, why should I exchange one tyrant three thousand miles away for three thousand tyrants one mile away?"

"The Patriot," Benjamin Martin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.