AC1 3,565 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 Judge for yourself:http://www.brandonrouth.com/gallery/thumbn...ls.php?album=30 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeinAR 1,759 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 The more I see, the more I want to see, its obvious that Singer respects his material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrScratch 292 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 New Superman Copycats Reeve?...and this is a bad thing?Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 480 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 New Superman Copycats Reeve?...and this is a bad thing?Same question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bondo 33 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 If you're gonna copy, copy from the best! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AC1 3,565 Posted April 18, 2005 Author Share Posted April 18, 2005 If Singer copycats Donner's movie, newer generations like the people of Ender might be disappointed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bondo 33 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 Too bad for them. It shouldn't pander to newer generations at the expense of a good movie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Lewis 6 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 Back to the geeky David Huxley-ish Clark Kent, are we?Too bad for them. It shouldn't pander to newer generations at the expense of a good movieBut of course. How can it be a good movie if it's modern, or if it drifts from the original? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AC1 3,565 Posted April 18, 2005 Author Share Posted April 18, 2005 Sorry Ender, seems like you have to wait for a few generations to go by again. Singer loves Donner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bondo 33 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 Ender, NO movie should pander to newer generations at the expense of a good movie. Naive? Sure, but why should it be modern for the sake of being modern? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Lewis 6 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 I'm not complaining yet. I was just reacting to these unexpected concessions I'll have to make. Mere anecdotes, if the result is good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeinAR 1,759 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 Too bad for them. It shouldn't pander to newer generations at the expense of a good movieand thats why I think batman begins will stink, its pandering to a newer generation, it has zero to do with Batman, the real one, not the reinvented one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AC1 3,565 Posted April 18, 2005 Author Share Posted April 18, 2005 It might be the first good one, Joe. I'm keeping my fingers crossed. The director is a big fan of Blade Runner. Singer loves Donner and Nolan loves Scott. The future looks bright! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 480 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 Anything better than that crap Schumacher came up with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,251 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 There is only one Batman! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 480 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,251 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 And this is Batman's special friend.Who lives with him at the Neverlan...eeehh..Wayne Mansion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 480 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 Yes, that was always a bit... weird. - Marc, who used to dress up as the Adam West Batman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeinAR 1,759 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 It might be the first good one, Joe. I'm keeping my fingers crossed. The director is a big fan of Blade Runner. Â Singer loves Donner and Nolan loves Scott. The future looks bright!the first one was the first good one, but now he's some martial arts freak, with an attitude.I prefer the dark detective to this reinvented one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrScratch 292 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 It might be the first good one, Joe. I'm keeping my fingers crossed. The director is a big fan of Blade Runner. Â Singer loves Donner and Nolan loves Scott. The future looks bright!Nolan has also stated his distaste for CGI, that and the Bladerunner thing give me some hope for this.Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeinAR 1,759 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 who is Nolan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahler3 353 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 The director, Christopher Nolan (Memento, Insomnia and of course Batman Begins) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deth 0 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 It might be the first good one, Joe. I'm keeping my fingers crossed. The director is a big fan of Blade Runner. Â Singer loves Donner and Nolan loves Scott. The future looks bright!the first one was the first good one, but now he's some martial arts freak, with an attitude.I prefer the dark detective to this reinvented one.this isn't a re-invented Batman.... this IS the REAL Batman... the true Batman is a martial arts expert... and had a hell of an attitude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Lewis 6 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 Singer loves Donner and Nolan loves Scott. The future looks bright!But it isn't really a "future", now is it?-Ross, who'd go further back in the past to find models to imitate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bondo 33 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 and thats why I think batman begins will stink, its pandering to a newer generation, it has zero to do with Batman, the real one, not the reinvented one.I actually have faith in the new one. Based only on what I've seen in the trailer and read about, Nolan seems passionate enough about the film to make it special, and not just 'the next batman'. The casting choices are terrific, and the JNH/Zimmer combo will prove to be an interesting one, I believe. I could obviously be wrong, but the mere fact that they admit that the last 2 were terrible speaks volumes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrScratch 292 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 Singer loves Donner and Nolan loves Scott. The future looks bright!But it isn't really a "future", now is it?What makes you say this? Spielberg has emulated his favorite directors for all of his movies. Orson Welles repeatedly watched John Ford's Stagecoach while he was making Kane, and the two movies have a lot in common, in terms of style, yet both are masterpieces. Every artist has influences, otherwise there would be no art.Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrScratch 292 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 ".....He can take a tear that's just forming in your eye, and he can cause it to drip" Spielberg on WilliamsI know this completely off topic, but I have always thought this quote was stupid. The first time I heard it, I pictured Williams jabbing someone in the eye with his baton.Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeinAR 1,759 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 It might be the first good one, Joe. I'm keeping my fingers crossed. The director is a big fan of Blade Runner. Â Singer loves Donner and Nolan loves Scott. The future looks bright!the first one was the first good one, but now he's some martial arts freak, with an attitude.I prefer the dark detective to this reinvented one.this isn't a re-invented Batman.... this IS the REAL Batman... the true Batman is a martial arts expert... and had a hell of an attitudethanks for proving you don't know what you are talking aboutThe director, Christopher Nolan (Memento, Insomnia and of course Batman Begins) yeah I know, as if this body of work just screams greatness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 480 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 ".....He can take a tear that's just forming in your eye, and he can cause it to drip" Spielberg on WilliamsI know this completely off topic, but I have always thought this quote was stupid. The first time I heard it, I pictured Williams jabbing someone in the eye with his baton.JeffLOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AC1 3,565 Posted April 18, 2005 Author Share Posted April 18, 2005 It might be the first good one, Joe. I'm keeping my fingers crossed. The director is a big fan of Blade Runner. Â Singer loves Donner and Nolan loves Scott. The future looks bright!the first one was the first good one, but now he's some martial arts freak, with an attitude.I prefer the dark detective to this reinvented one.this isn't a re-invented Batman.... this IS the REAL Batman... the true Batman is a martial arts expert... and had a hell of an attitudethanks for proving you don't know what you are talking aboutThe director, Christopher Nolan (Memento, Insomnia and of course Batman Begins) yeah I know, as if this body of work just screams greatness.People call him a talented director. And looking back at the previous installments, I can only see Nolan's approach as very positive. In fact, I think Batman 'needs' Nolan. ----------------Alex Cremers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahler3 353 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 ".....He can take a tear that's just forming in your eye, and he can cause it to drip" Spielberg on WilliamsI know this completely off topic, but I have always thought this quote was stupid. The first time I heard it, I pictured Williams jabbing someone in the eye with his baton.JeffMmm never really looked at it the same way as you obviously do, what a morbid image! I think Spielberg was referring to ET at the time and that quote succinctly sums up my feelings too.Got your PM by the way, check your inbox! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Lewis 6 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 What makes you say this? Â Spielberg has emulated his favorite directors for all of his movies. Â Orson Welles repeatedly watched John Ford's Stagecoach while he was making Kane, and the two movies have a lot in common, in terms of style, yet both are masterpieces. Â Every artist has influences, otherwise there would be no art.So I gather you didn't read what came after my name in the post? There is nothing in your reply that I disagree with.Fact remains that neither Spielberg nor Welles were making remakes of those movies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morlock 9 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 Link's not working for me. Can anyone give me the jist of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AC1 3,565 Posted April 18, 2005 Author Share Posted April 18, 2005 Bandwidth Limit Exceeded What have I done?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrScratch 292 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 What makes you say this? Â Spielberg has emulated his favorite directors for all of his movies. Â Orson Welles repeatedly watched John Ford's Stagecoach while he was making Kane, and the two movies have a lot in common, in terms of style, yet both are masterpieces. Â Every artist has influences, otherwise there would be no art.So I gather you didn't read what came after my name in the post? There is nothing in your reply that I disagree with.Semantics. I said what I said because I thought you were saying that "the future doesn't look bright" in response to Alex (still with me?) because Nolan was trying to emulate/imitate other directors. I did read your full post, but you said "imitate" which I guess took to be a derogatory remark about directors who emulate other filmmakers. But I see your point now in that he is merely imitating the wrong directors (which I disagree with) not that he is wrong to emulate past filmmakers in general.Now, bonus points for whoever can translate what I just said.Fact remains that neither Spielberg nor Welles were making remakes of those moviesWhether he's making a remake, sequel or prequel is irrelevant. A movie is a movie is a movie and any story can be told in an infinite number of ways.Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrScratch 292 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 People call him a talented director. And looking back at the previous installments, I can only see Nolan's approach as very positive. In fact, I think Batman 'needs' Nolan.Trust him Joe, he thinks like a reviewer. Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrScratch 292 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 Got your PM by the way, check your inbox! Â I have nothing... did you reply to my PM or email me?Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AC1 3,565 Posted April 18, 2005 Author Share Posted April 18, 2005 "the future doesn't look bright" Â JeffI never said that. First you misread Ender and now me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrScratch 292 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 First you misread Ender and now me.Corrected.Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Lewis 6 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 Semantics. Â I said what I said because I thought you were saying that "the future doesn't look bright" (in response to Alex... still with me?) because Nolan was trying to emulate/imitate other directors. Â I did read your full post, but you said "imitate" which I guess took to be a derogatory remark about directors who emulate other filmmakers. Â But I see your point now in that he is merely imitating the wrong directors (which I disagree with) not that he is wrong to emulate past filmmakers in general.Actually...Whether he's making a remake, sequel or prequel is irrelevant. Â A movie is a movie is a movie and any story can be told in an infinite number of ways.I was saying that if any story can be told in an inifite number of ways (very true words), why follow so closely the steps of the original? Why not exploit the possibilities? Isn't that what remakes are for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morlock 9 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 Anyone? Jist? hello? Morlock- who reckons he can venture a pretty good guess, but would like to be sure exactly how "New Superman Copycats Reeve?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrScratch 292 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 Whether he's making a remake, sequel or prequel is irrelevant. Â A movie is a movie is a movie and any story can be told in an infinite number of ways.I was saying that if any story can be told in an inifite number of ways (very true words), why follow so closely the steps of the original? Why not exploit the possibilities? Isn't that what remakes are for?I don't think it's a matter of following "so closely the steps of the original" as there being consistency in a film franchise. It's a good thing if this new Superman film continues with and expands the storyline from the first two movies. In this regards, Singer should look to the older movies for inspiration. It's a bad thing if this new Superman movie is a virtual paint-by-numbers remake of the original. In this regard, Singer should "exploit the possibilities" and take the movie in new directions while also remaining faithful to the previous films at the same time. Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QMM 4 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 In reply to the topic there's always going to be the two people at the opposite ends of the spectrumShouldn't he look like Reeve?orShouldn't they be trying to do something new? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bondo 33 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 He should look like Superman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morlock 9 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 ANYONE?!?!??!?!!??!?!?!??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AC1 3,565 Posted April 18, 2005 Author Share Posted April 18, 2005 http://www.supermanhomepage.com/images/sup...randon3-tb.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Lewis 6 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 I don't think it's a matter of following "so closely the steps of the original" as there being consistency in a film franchise. Â It's a good thing if this new Superman film continues with and expands the storyline from the first two movies. Â In this regards, Singer should look to the older movies for inspiration. Â It's a bad thing if this new Superman movie is a virtual paint-by-numbers remake of the original. Â In this regard, Singer should "exploit the possibilities" and take the movie in new directions while also remaining faithful to the previous films at the same time. I see. So that's where we disagree. So strongly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker 5 Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 The more I see, the more I want to see, its obvious that Singer respects his material.Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deth 0 Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 It might be the first good one, Joe. I'm keeping my fingers crossed. The director is a big fan of Blade Runner. Â 8OSinger loves Donner and Nolan loves Scott. The future looks bright!the first one was the first good one, but now he's some martial arts freak, with an attitude.I prefer the dark detective to this reinvented one.this isn't a re-invented Batman.... this IS the REAL Batman... the true Batman is a martial arts expert... and had a hell of an attitudethanks for proving you don't know what you are talking aboutThe director, Christopher Nolan (Memento, Insomnia and of course Batman Begins) yeah I know, as if this body of work just screams greatness.oh I don't? and why not? Where is it that Batman is NOT trained the martial arts?? If you say Batman doesn't have a sort of attitude... then well.... I just can't comment on that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now