Josh500 1,615 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Maybe it's too early for this poll, but hey . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesie 1 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Might... Doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 It's entirely possible it will.Or.Perhaps not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Skywalker 1,792 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 It's entirely possible it will.Or.Perhaps not.wise words Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Crichton 4 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Shouldn't we at least see the movie before talking about this? :? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesie 1 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Why? We're just contemplating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendal_Ozzel 36 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 I couldn't even begin to say without having seen the film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trumpeteer 302 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Sight unseen, I would think this film has no chance. Spielber has made more important films that have not been nominated. I think a big-budget remake/revisioning will not be in the voters' scopes.Hold out for other categories, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Lewis 6 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 I couldn't even begin to say without having seen the film.Not a member of the Academy, I suppose? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightscape94 965 Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 ARE YOU HIGH?!?!?!?!?Tim, who will quietly say No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Barnsbury 8 Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 I highly doubt it.Ray Barnsbury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 555 Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 Sight unseen, I would think this film has no chance. Spielber has made more important films that have not been nominated. I think a big-budget remake/revisioning will not be in the voters' scopes.Hold out for other categories, though.Wise words.The answer is no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Skywalker 1,792 Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 Sight unseen, I would think this film has no chance. Spielber has made more important films that have not been nominated. I think a big-budget remake/revisioning will not be in the voters' scopes.Hold out for other categories, though.Let's hope the Peter Jackson hype doesn't make the contrary... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bondo 33 Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 How in the world would I know? It's the Oscars! The best picture NEVER gets nominated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morlock 11 Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 How in the world would I know? It's the Oscars! The best picture NEVER gets nominated. Not true. Morlock- who says no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bondo 33 Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 From a certain POV And for the record, "Gladiator" deserved it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeinAR 1,949 Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 The few early reviews have been so good that maybe it might just surprise and garner a Best Picture nod, after all Jaws did, Raiders did, E.T. did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morlock 11 Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 From a certain POV And for the record, "Gladiator" deserved it No, it didn't. And if it did, it's only because 2000 was a rather sucky year, movie wise (even so, it ain't best picture). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeinAR 1,949 Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 Morlock is correct, Gladiator didn't deserve it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batmanand 0 Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 Maybe deserved a nomination, but I agree, not BEST picture of 2000 (Crouching Tiger wins hands down for me). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
movieman101 0 Posted June 17, 2005 Share Posted June 17, 2005 Why not nominate ROTS while were at it?Its halfway through the year, no one has even seen it yet.I have a poll......Are there too many needless polls around? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morlock 11 Posted June 17, 2005 Share Posted June 17, 2005 Maybe deserved a nomination, but I agree, not BEST picture of 2000 (Crouching Tiger wins hands down for me). 2000 actually had two of the best movies of the year nominated for best picture (Crouching Tiger and Traffic), and another one nominated for a bunch of other stuff (Almost Famous), and all three got a respectible slice of the awards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morlock 11 Posted June 17, 2005 Share Posted June 17, 2005 Oh, and back to the subject, judging from this review, WoTW is a very different movie than I expected, and has a bigger chance of having a larger presence at next year's awards. May have been posted already, but that review did it for me. I finally understand how the movie can be great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike 0 Posted June 17, 2005 Share Posted June 17, 2005 Oh, and back to the subject, judging from this review, WoTW is a very different movie than I expected, and has a bigger chance of having a larger presence at next year's awards. May have been posted already, but that review did it for me. I finally understand how the movie can be great.Please, never ever judge from a "Ain't it cool news"-Site. These guys over there are just fans writing some blabla reviews, which should not be taken seriously. Somehow I suspect they are being paid by the industry to post previews, which mostly praise the given movie in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morlock 11 Posted June 17, 2005 Share Posted June 17, 2005 That is precisely what I've said several times before. But the donated reviews are usually more trustworthy than the AICN staff's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now