Jacck 23 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 I have a question relating to time signatures OK, I was looking at a copy of the E.T. Flying Theme orchestral score today... And noticed it was written in 2/2 ...My question is (and it's probably a stupid one)... Why would one decide to write a piece in 2/2 rather than 4/4 ?Jack- Confused.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeshopk 8 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Maybe he just didn't want to expend too much arm energy when conducting it. But we should definitely find out why.Could you list all the time signatures used and tell me where they change in the music? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightscape94 965 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Half note gets the beat? I honestly don't remember the last time I saw something like that. Unless you meant 2/4.Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robthehand 3 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 2/2 is the same as cut-common time.Maybe he just didn't want to expend too much arm energy when conducting it.That's actually true - it's for fast orchestral music, which is better "thought through" in larger chunks, without having to use hemi-demi-semi-quavers or whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightscape94 965 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 2/2 is the same as cut-common time.Wow, I've been out of the game for a while. I forgot about that. Tim, who hasn't read music for over a year when he did a production of 'Pippin' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pianoman1 0 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 In simpler terms its the same as 4/4 but everything is twice as fast.So you would see a quarter note but it would be played as an eighth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Composer_Fan 2 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 I thought the Flying Theme was in 3/2. Regardless, it's in 2, and I too haven't figured out which is better... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Docteur Qui 1,544 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 In simpler terms its the same as 4/4 but everything is twice as fast.So you would see a quarter note but it would be played as an eighth.But it's not a tempo change; it's the time signature. I thought it just meant that there are two minims in a bar - i.e. the eqivalent of 4 crotchets. It'd make sense to have 2/2 with a fast tempo; it just means less work for the conductor (and only two clicks/minims per bar for the metronome). That was me, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deleted account 108 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 Time signatures work like this - the bottom number tells you what the base note value is and the top number tells you how many of those note-values there are per measure. So 4/4 means 4 quarter notes per measure. 6/8 means 6 eight-notes per measure. 2/2 means 2 half notes per measure. A practical effect of this is manifested in the way the conductor conveys the beat to the orchestra and the way the music is written rhytmically. For instance, the opening fanfare of the Star Wars main title is written in 4/4 so the brass are playing triplets and sixteenth notes. Once the theme starts (in measure 3, I think) the pulse changes to 2/2 so that the first two notes of the theme are whole notes. The upshot of this is that the brass and low strings, which are playing those militaristic rhythmic fills, are reading them as eighth-notes instead of sixteenths, making easier for them get it down (and quickly, which is a consideration when recording film music). The downside of this is that you essentially go through twice as many measures of written music, so you are turning pages faster and creating bigger documents for the musicians to have to wrangle on their stands during a performance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 Elvisjones?Responding to a non-Star Wars music related thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightscape94 965 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 And who the hell is he explaining it to?Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deleted account 108 Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 How about to you, plebian? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeshopk 8 Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 Williams could have written it in 3, but when I conduct it in 2/2, it gives it a certain weightless feel with things that would be downbeats coming on upbeats. He did this in the tennis scene of Eastwick, with what you'd think of as upbeats coming on downbeats, for a weightless performance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacck 23 Posted November 10, 2005 Author Share Posted November 10, 2005 I see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightscape94 965 Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 How about to you, plebian?I've already admitted my folly in an earlier post, I've been playing the guitar for 15 years and don't need cut time explained to me. . It's just been a while since I've seen the signature.Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightscape94 965 Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 P.S. It's plebeian not plebian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deleted account 108 Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 P.S. It's plebeian not plebian Tongue<---------------shamed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightscape94 965 Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 ^Sarcastic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxfan 128 Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 Williams ALWAYS conducts it in 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deleted account 108 Posted November 11, 2005 Share Posted November 11, 2005 Williams could have written it in 3, but when I conduct it in 2/2, it gives it a certain weightless feel with things that would be downbeats coming on upbeats. He did this in the tennis scene of Eastwick, with what you'd think of as upbeats coming on downbeats, for a weightless performance.Obviously this isn't a consideration for fans who just like to conduct along with the cd, but when leading an orchestra one must obviously conduct in the same meter (time signature) as the music is written. Otherwise, the orchestra will have no idea where you think they should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now