Jump to content

hoby12

Members
  • Posts

    378
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by hoby12

  1. Oscars are no more then a popularity contest

    Really? If they're nothing more than a popularity contest, then why did Corigliano win in 2000 for The Red Violin? I don't recall that film -- or score -- enjoying enormous popularity.

    A wide range of things are taken into factor. Note that people who have been up for many oscars start drawing sympathy votes - its the same for entrance into the hall of fame for sports. I think that the score nominations are associated more with the film and less with the composer. And therefore musicallity is not singled out as it should be. I am positive that many people will be voting who have never heard some of these scores. That is why agents send out media packets with CD's attached. I have the feeling that since Harry Potter is just a "kid's book/film" in the eyes of many adults that John Williams will be overlooked again by filmmakers who take the art more seriously then purely entertainment.

    PS Some scores, like the Red Violin, are just no brainers to vote for. Certain films like Lawrence of Arabia, Schindler's List, The Adventures of Robin Hood were clearly the best of that year. I just do not get how scores like Godfather 2 win, when the first one lost. Clearly that was a sympathy vote (or rather a compensation vote). I honestly don't think that too many people put nearly as much thought into it as we do.

    I hope JW wins, this is one of his finest scores ( which is saying something).

    In my opinion 9/10 times when he is nominated his is the finest score musically there.

    Man I was just reviewing this list of past winners nominees. Some scores which lost which are amazing scores.

    no JW included

    Gone With the Wind

    Magnificent 7

    Planet of the Apes

    Patton

    Chinatown

    Jeez you just never know with these voters.

    I am glad Million Dollar baby was excluded.

  2. Oscars are no more then a popularity contest, I guarantee you that 95 Percent of the people voting couldn't hum a single bar from any of the nominees (except the voting composers, music editors etc....). Its like OK Passion had music, great I will vote for that since I didn't vote for it for best cinematography etc....

    I will root for JW, yet I will also be satsified with JNH getting one for his shelf.

    Debney is great - but Passion is not an Oscar Worthy score - there is really nothing much to it, especially it lacks originality.

  3. The more you get to look at his conductor scores the more you begin to appreciate the writing for the woodwinds. Especially creative doubling and really cool counterlines which are buried into the mix and not always "heard". He is also a master of aggressive string writing - Aesteroid Field and Duel of the Fates. Often has famous brass sections are simply doubles of the string section. I also love the way he uses woodwinds to sparkle the trumpets - having the oboes play at pitch with the trumpets double it up an octave with the flutes - If I had to pick one John Williams orchestrational thing to represent most of his work that would be it. He uses that practially everywhere - in all scores.

  4. Sure Whatever I will give it a try:

    1. ET - Flying Theme/Into Theme (Lydian)

    2. Imperial Theme

    3. Jaws

    4. Jurassic Park Second Theme (Journey to the Island)

    5. Raiders March

    6. Hook Main Theme (Prologue)

    7. Duel of the Fates Motif and Theme

    8. Schindler's List Theme

    9. Theme from the Asteriod Chase

    10. Fawkes the Pheonix

    thats mine in order - i am sure yours will differ.

  5. Sometimes great doublings sound like other instruments.

    I think JW uses Alto Flute, Basson, English Horn, Clarinet all at the same pitch to simulate a French Horn in Harry Potter - check around 49 seconds on the proluge of track 1 of harry potter 1 to see what I mean. What a neat thing!

  6. see if you can figure this out.

    Make sure to look at your keyboard!

    Simpld right???

    The deciphering is actual, the spelling error I think was a mistake by the encrypter!  

    :mrgreen:

    That was fun, but a little easy. Just needed to think about it.  

    I won't give away how it was done.

    D99o T99e u9g

    * 5y8hi 9ho6 23 dqh 7he34w5qhe 5y8w

    24853 j3 gqdi 8h 5y8w d9e3

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.