LOL, I know, I wasn't really insulting it. I never really got into it, but I don't hate it or anything (although I abslolutely loved that little handheld Tomy videogame to it back in the early 80's! I still have a collection of those old LCD things... heh). And it isn't neccesarily a masterpiece or anything... usually Alexcremers only defends critic-favorite 4-star films and snots all over the rest. I was just making fun because Alex implied that I shouldn't post anymore because my tally was 1977 in another thread. Well, the world TRON created IS a masterpiece. I would expect a true Star Wars fan to stop posting when he reaches the number 1977, the birth year of the religion he believes in. ---------------- Alex Cremers
It's not only just her, you know. Really, while the first one is a genuine class act, the second one is crude and loud "entertainment". I understand why Spielberg distance himself from it. The third one is simply wooden. Spielberg' s heart was someplace else when he made it. Honestly, loving them all is an insult to the classic which is Raiders Of The Lost Ark. I would love to buy the DVD, if only it were available as a seperate release. ---------------- Alex Cremers
What do you know about the 80s polls? And Maestro is right, people don't quote him that often anymore. It used to be different, quite different. ---------------- Alex Cremers
It's our character is here, than there, than here again, than there again, than he's there, then there, then there, then here, then there again, then here. It's the remembrance of a child. The film is shot through Jim's eyes. The film is brilliant (OK, almost).
The original has a slight brittle sound often referred to as "digital sounding". I thought the OST is a rerecording and that the SACD, like the anniversary edition, is in fact the real soundtrack.
If you're into classical music and you need a new player, SACD is a good investment because many new classical releases are in this format. A good SA-CD is also a good CD player.