Carnifex 5 Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 Hmm...I recognize that Silvestri has employed filler scoring methods in cues (strings holding a long note being the chief offender), but I fail to see how scores like Back to the Future Parts I, II, and III, Who Framed Roger Rabbit, Stuart Little, and The Polar Express are less interesting than Jablonsky's. Please, enlighten me. Maybe I missed something--are there any specific cues from either composer that jump to mind as more/less interesting? Also, three stars out four or five?No, you have not missed anything and neither have I. I have listened to all of those scores you mentioned, and they do not excel nor are they bad, that is the magic of Alan Silvestri to me. He has never lit my emotions. I cannot give you cues, I can give you scores, and I have listened many of his. Yeah three stars out of five is appropriate.By the way it is not farce to compare Silvestri disfavourably to Jablonsky's Steamboy; it is farce to compare him to all other Jablonsky's scores. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeshopk 8 Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 Even "Grumpier Old Men" is better than "Steamboy" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnifex 5 Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 Even "Grumpier Old Men" is better than "Steamboy"That must be the five star Silvestri score I have been looking for then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now