King Mark 3,631 Posted October 31, 2002 Share Posted October 31, 2002 Finally a theral official answer fromthe"Jedi Council"...interesting.www.starwars.comK.M. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Mark 3,631 Posted November 1, 2002 Author Share Posted November 1, 2002 To reply to myself,it's funny that no matter how much we argued about this in the past here,Lucasfilm folks had forgotten themselves apperently.K.M. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tpigeon 3 Posted November 1, 2002 Share Posted November 1, 2002 it can be quite confusing, but who cares? some can call it Star Wars and they're right. some can call it Star Wars: Episode IV: A New Hope and they're right. but nonetheless, people will still argue it to death and for what reason i don't know. can't we all just be brothers? Ted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest macrea Posted November 1, 2002 Share Posted November 1, 2002 This is not about what people call the film, but when they changed the opening crawl to add "Episode IV: A NEW HOPE." I remember it appearing in 1981 during the April ("The Force will be with you for two weeks only") reissue. Other people have insisted it appeared in 1979, but they always struck me as the same people who saw the Biggs Tatooine scenes in 1977. Glad to find out that I was apparently correct.Matt -- who will always call the "FILM" STAR WARS, but may refer to the "STORY" "Episode IV" or "A New Hope" when having a discussion about the "saga" in which clarification is necessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Mark 3,631 Posted November 1, 2002 Author Share Posted November 1, 2002 it can be quite confusing, but who cares? some can call it Star Wars and they're right. some can call it Star Wars: Episode IV: A New Hope and they're right. but nonetheless, people will still argue it to death and for what reason i don't know. can't we all just be brothers? TedActually the point here is to click on the link and read the story...K.M.Who knew Star Wars was later named Episode 4 a few years later but didn't know exactly which release. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morn 8 Posted November 1, 2002 Share Posted November 1, 2002 On that day, whatever it was, saints sang, because ANH was finally integrated into the trilogy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AHerrera83 0 Posted November 1, 2002 Share Posted November 1, 2002 Er--Actually, there was no Trilogy at that point yet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morn 8 Posted November 1, 2002 Share Posted November 1, 2002 I know... the intergration... sorta came first... anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker 5 Posted November 1, 2002 Share Posted November 1, 2002 I'm just glad to see that Lucasfilm finally officially aknowledged this. I've been saying this for at least a year now, and have been met with quite a bit of skepticism.I never thought I'd say "thank you Lucasfilm" but anything can happen.Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ocelot 508 Posted November 1, 2002 Share Posted November 1, 2002 When Star Wars became Episode 4.......Neil panicked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tpigeon 3 Posted November 1, 2002 Share Posted November 1, 2002 When Star Wars became Episode 4.......Neil panicked i think so.ted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Skywalker 1,795 Posted November 1, 2002 Share Posted November 1, 2002 When Star Wars became Episode 4.......Neil panicked i think so.tedOnly?! :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now