Mr. Breathmask 555 Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 They just need to leave Indy alone already. Give us the complete scores and be done with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue_Leader 2 Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 I still say give us 1 more dammit! After all this hype for Indy 4 they own us something! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 555 Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 Meh. I just think Indy belongs in the past. With the good movies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue_Leader 2 Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 Does that mean there could not be a good Indy movie in the present? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 555 Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue_Leader 2 Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 Why not? What have the winds of fate deemed any Indy movie made outside of the 80's cannot be good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 555 Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 There's a lot of things. I'm not going into this right now. It just sounds like a bad idea. It sounded like one to me from the start.- Marc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HPFAN_2 0 Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 I agree Indy needs to be left alone. Don't mess with a good thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue_Leader 2 Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 By this attitude they never should have made any SW films after Star Wars. Just because you've already got a good thing doesn;t mean it cannot be expanded upon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 555 Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 Don't you have a sig that says the only Star Wars films are the ones made in 1977, 1980 and 1983? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker 5 Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 By this attitude they never should have made any SW films after Star Wars. I don't see that as a bad thing at this point.Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue_Leader 2 Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 By this attitude they never should have made any SW films after Star Wars. I don't see that as a bad thing at this point.NeilNeil! That is bloody blasphemy! I mean come on! If that happened we never woud have gotten ESB. IMO eveb ROTJ was definately worth having. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker 5 Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 By this attitude they never should have made any SW films after Star Wars. I don't see that as a bad thing at this point.NeilNeil! That is bloody blasphemy! I mean come on! If that happened we never woud have gotten ESB. IMO eveb ROTJ was definately worth having.I'm not getting into this again. Sorry.Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Lewis 6 Posted June 12, 2004 Share Posted June 12, 2004 Does that mean there could not be a good Indy movie in the present?Shall I never see an Indy of threescore again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue_Leader 2 Posted June 13, 2004 Share Posted June 13, 2004 At this point I have to wonder if Indy 4 ever does get made if they wont bring in another actor to do the role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Mark 3,631 Posted June 13, 2004 Author Share Posted June 13, 2004 I'm telling you,Lucas next big next big thing is taking old actors and making them look young with CGI.They sort of did that with Christopher Lee's body in AotC...not they'll do that to Harison ford too,and make his face like 20 years ago.K.M. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morn 8 Posted June 13, 2004 Share Posted June 13, 2004 I'll be very interested to hear the approach Williams with his new style takes with Indy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HPFAN_2 0 Posted June 13, 2004 Share Posted June 13, 2004 I have no doubt that if Indy does get made it will just be a big CGI reel. Lucas seems to like playing with his toy ILM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker 5 Posted June 13, 2004 Share Posted June 13, 2004 I have no doubt that if Indy does get made it will just be a big CGI reel. Lucas seems to like playing with his toy ILM.Except, that if it does happen (and I hope it doesn't) it will be a Spielberg film, not a Lucas film.Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeejaHalycon 0 Posted June 13, 2004 Share Posted June 13, 2004 I'm telling you,Lucas next big next big thing is taking old actors and making them look young with CGI.They sort of did that with Christopher Lee's body in AotC...not they'll do that to Harison ford too,and make his face like 20 years ago.K.M.Well, there's already make-up effects that could get them halfway there. What exactly did they do to Lee in AOTC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue_Leader 2 Posted June 14, 2004 Share Posted June 14, 2004 KM is probably right. ALMIOST certainly if this film does get made (which I honestly still hope it does I must say) there will be shots of a digital Harrison Ford jumping off crap and taking falls. Its sad but unfortunately this is what waiting so friggin long has made this series come to. OH and to answer neeja's question above me, in AOTC Lee's head was superimposed on a stuntguy's body during many of the fight scene moments in AOTC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry B 50 Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 Well, there's already make-up effects that could get them halfway there. What exactly did they do to Lee in AOTC?Christopher Lee couldn't handle Dooku's fight scene, so for most of the shots a stunt double (who is just as old as Lee, mind you) filled in for him, then ILM pasted a CG Lee face onto him. But I assure you they did not modify Lee's body with CG effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker 5 Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 a stunt double (who is just as old as Lee, mind you)What documentation do you have to prove there is a stunt double making films who is Lee's age? For the record he was 78 or so when he made AOTC.Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeejaHalycon 0 Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 OH and to answer neeja's question above me, in AOTC Lee's head was superimposed on a stuntguy's body during many of the fight scene moments in AOTC.Didn't they also do that to McGregor and Neeson in TPM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Crichton 4 Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 OH and to answer neeja's question above me, in AOTC Lee's head was superimposed on a stuntguy's body during many of the fight scene moments in AOTC.Didn't they also do that to McGregor and Neeson in TPM?No. I think they filmed the whole thing themselves with no doubles. If they did use doubles, they didn't use any CG tricks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry B 50 Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 What documentation do you have to prove there is a stunt double making films who is Lee's age? For the record he was 78 or so when he made AOTC.I must have been duped by the white beard. There is a stunt double shown in the "From Puppets to Pixels" Episode II documentary, but he is not named and his age is not very clear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeejaHalycon 0 Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 OH and to answer neeja's question above me, in AOTC Lee's head was superimposed on a stuntguy's body during many of the fight scene moments in AOTC.Didn't they also do that to McGregor and Neeson in TPM?No. I think they filmed the whole thing themselves with no doubles. If they did use doubles, they didn't use any CG tricks.Are you sure? I could have sworn I saw clips in the making of with doubles doing the fight, and the actors getting their faces scanned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Crichton 4 Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 No. I think they filmed the whole thing themselves with no doubles. If they did use doubles, they didn't use any CG tricks.Are you sure? I could have sworn I saw clips in the making of with doubles doing the fight, and the actors getting their faces scanned.Well, I was pretty sure I was sure until you asked me if I was sure, now I'm not so sure. Are you sure? Seriously, I thought that's the way it was. I don't remember doubles or CG scanning. But I could be wrong. I'd have to watch the DVD specials again to be sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue_Leader 2 Posted June 16, 2004 Share Posted June 16, 2004 OH and to answer neeja's question above me, in AOTC Lee's head was superimposed on a stuntguy's body during many of the fight scene moments in AOTC.Didn't they also do that to McGregor and Neeson in TPM?No. I think they filmed the whole thing themselves with no doubles. If they did use doubles, they didn't use any CG tricks.It was Neeson and McGregor for most of it except the flips and fancy stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now