Guest Posted October 25, 2002 Share Posted October 25, 2002 (Napoleons Ghoest)Hey guys, haven't been on in a while, just wanted to give you this.http://www.gop.com/flash/bushsavestheday.htmlSorry for the political context, so any people who don't like the Republicans might not want to go here, but for everybody else, you might be interested.Again, no offense meant, if Ricard thinks this shouldn't be on here, go ahead and delete it. I don't want a big argument.Anyway, hello again!The Ghoest- Who's trying not to make this a political post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scissorhands 16 Posted October 25, 2002 Share Posted October 25, 2002 The Ghoest- Who's trying not to make this a political post.I'm not that sure.I can't see any more reasons for it, because you can hear SUPERMAN's March in many commercials, sites, TV shows, etc.What does this one Napoleon showed us have different from others? Controversy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 25, 2002 Share Posted October 25, 2002 This is brand new, and if I see a William's mention, I try to post it. I suppose I knew though that it would be quickly clouded. Oh well.The Ghoest- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scissorhands 16 Posted October 25, 2002 Share Posted October 25, 2002 . I suppose I knew though that it would be quickly clouded. I also did know that.But someone had to be the first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 25, 2002 Share Posted October 25, 2002 To clarify:I seem to have missed a slight tweaking of the rules. You used to be able to point out something political or religous if it had William's music. I used to post anything I saw that had William's music on it (examples: JFK at 9/11 memorial, Patriot theme at NBA All-star game). The new change seems to be that no religous or political themes are permissible, which I missed. If the Democratic ad that preceded this one had William's music, I would have posted that, with it's accompanying warning (People who don't like Democrats, don't read). In fact, I would have posted a Milosevic ad if it had Vader's theme in it. So chalk this one up to my misunderstanding of the new rule, and I will try to be more careful next time.The Ghoest- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Barnsbury 8 Posted October 25, 2002 Share Posted October 25, 2002 In any case, it was nice, although the "edits" were worse than Lucas. Ray Barnsbury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ocelot 508 Posted October 25, 2002 Share Posted October 25, 2002 It's ridiculous and I think Williams should ban it or take them to court! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morn 8 Posted October 25, 2002 Share Posted October 25, 2002 This is shameful use of Williams music to promote a great evil! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross 1 Posted October 25, 2002 Share Posted October 25, 2002 Napoleon your intentions were good (I never thought I would ever say this sentence). But I fear this is totally out place. There are many, many, MAAAANY bad things I can say about that commercial.PM me if you should want to know them.-ROSS, expecting Ricard to take action on this ASAP. But still thinks Napoleon meant no harm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chs058 0 Posted October 25, 2002 Share Posted October 25, 2002 this is just too ridicoulus (I mean the comercial) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RomanticStrings 10 Posted October 25, 2002 Share Posted October 25, 2002 Ghoest, your intentions were great and I condone your action about putting the ad on the website.Everyone who made a comment regarding the contents of the post, shame on you. You are the one's who made this post political.~Conor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morn 8 Posted October 26, 2002 Share Posted October 26, 2002 There's no shame in doing that, I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RomanticStrings 10 Posted October 26, 2002 Share Posted October 26, 2002 There's no shame in politics in real (I use that term to mean the non-JWFan.net world), but here there is shame in it, or a least a ban on it. ~Conor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricard 2,245 Posted October 26, 2002 Share Posted October 26, 2002 To clarify:I seem to have missed a slight tweaking of the rules. You used to be able to point out something political or religous if it had William's music. I used to post anything I saw that had William's music on it (examples: JFK at 9/11 memorial, Patriot theme at NBA All-star game). The new change seems to be that no religous or political themes are permissible, which I missed. If the Democratic ad that preceded this one had William's music, I would have posted that, with it's accompanying warning (People who don't like Democrats, don't read). In fact, I would have posted a Milosevic ad if it had Vader's theme in it. So chalk this one up to my misunderstanding of the new rule, and I will try to be more careful next time.The Ghoest-The rules haven't changed in that respect. Your post is perfectly acceptable here. Political discussion is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morn 8 Posted October 27, 2002 Share Posted October 27, 2002 It's Ricard's shame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 27, 2002 Share Posted October 27, 2002 (Napoleons Ghoest)Oh, thanks for the clarification Ricard.The Ghoest- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now