JoeinAR 1,949 Posted December 29, 2003 Share Posted December 29, 2003 He is the most expensive anamatronic in film history.looks like a big eagle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hector J. Guzman 1 Posted December 29, 2003 Share Posted December 29, 2003 I've seen bigger, that's just a little... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Mark 3,631 Posted December 30, 2003 Share Posted December 30, 2003 Maybe it's one of these big eagles in Return of the King Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Barnsbury 8 Posted December 30, 2003 Share Posted December 30, 2003 I saw this too, I think he looks great. I'm so glad they're using an animatronic and not totally CG-ing it.Ray Barnsbury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Mark 3,631 Posted December 30, 2003 Share Posted December 30, 2003 Hope he's better than Fawkes.K.M. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 555 Posted December 30, 2003 Share Posted December 30, 2003 That's quite the birdie. Hope it works.- Marc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted December 30, 2003 Share Posted December 30, 2003 It has bloodlust in it's eyes i tell's you.KILL IT...KILL IT!!!Stefancos- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HPFAN_2 0 Posted December 30, 2003 Share Posted December 30, 2003 Fawkes looked beautiful, the color and the feathers were magnificent but it moved like it had arthritis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Barnsbury 8 Posted December 30, 2003 Share Posted December 30, 2003 I kind of agree that Fawkes' movements weren't the most realistic, but I'd still rather have something you know is actually there than a fluid piece of jelly made from CG.Ray Barnsbury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ocelot 508 Posted December 30, 2003 Share Posted December 30, 2003 Not me. I'd rather have something that didn't move like it was in Clash of the Titans!!! What I don't get is why they couldn't spend the time of filming a bird that is roughly the same size and shape and CGing over it so that it looked real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morlock 11 Posted January 1, 2004 Share Posted January 1, 2004 The eyes look fake. It lost me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker 5 Posted January 1, 2004 Share Posted January 1, 2004 The eyes look fake. It lost me.Wait until you see it properly lit in the movie.Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Lewis 6 Posted January 3, 2004 Share Posted January 3, 2004 That's what they said about Bette Middler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QMM 4 Posted January 4, 2004 Share Posted January 4, 2004 Fawkes looked beautiful, the color and the feathers were magnificent but it moved like it had arthritisDidn't you hear Dumbledore explain how freaking old Fawke's was right before he killed himself and got reborn from the ashes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HPFAN_2 0 Posted January 4, 2004 Share Posted January 4, 2004 Then why did he move the same way in the chamber of secrets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QMM 4 Posted January 4, 2004 Share Posted January 4, 2004 He was.....distracted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts