Hook or ET?
#1
Posted 09 September 2004 - 12:23 AM
#2
Posted 09 September 2004 - 01:21 AM
#3
Posted 09 September 2004 - 01:29 AM
NOT!
#4
Posted 09 September 2004 - 02:03 AM
#5
Posted 09 September 2004 - 02:13 AM
HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! etc.
:roll:
:?
#6
Posted 09 September 2004 - 02:34 AM
#7
Posted 09 September 2004 - 02:57 AM
HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK! HOOK!
Neil
#8
Posted 09 September 2004 - 03:18 AM
#9
Posted 09 September 2004 - 03:26 AM
I love Hook. It is one of my absolute favorite scores. But there's no need to go completely off the deep end to show support for it.
#10
Posted 09 September 2004 - 03:27 AM
Probably.Does Hook deserve to be regurgitated on?
Neil
#11
Posted 09 September 2004 - 03:59 AM
#12
Posted 09 September 2004 - 05:49 AM
K.M.
#13
Posted 09 September 2004 - 06:07 AM
Ray Barnsbury
#14
Posted 09 September 2004 - 06:07 AM
BTW, E.T. sounds more majestic than Hook.
----------------
Alex Cremers
#15
Posted 09 September 2004 - 10:56 AM
Hypocrites :roll:
#16
Posted 09 September 2004 - 10:58 AM
#17
Posted 09 September 2004 - 11:11 AM
#18
Posted 09 September 2004 - 11:14 AM
The E.T. score gets mentioned on here from time to time but not nearly as much.
Then agaiun this is talking about just one theme not which score is better overall. So that can explain it.
#19
Posted 09 September 2004 - 12:18 PM
#20
Posted 09 September 2004 - 01:44 PM
#21
Posted 09 September 2004 - 08:51 PM
#22
Posted 09 September 2004 - 10:52 PM
Because Hook seems to get so much hype on here. I see it regularly mentioned among this boards member's favorite scores.
The E.T. score gets mentioned on here from time to time but not nearly as much.
Hook is a great score of course, and as such it deserves to be mentioned a lot. E.T. is simply beyond that. It is such a classic memorable score that it has become ingrained in our collective psyche and doesn't need to be hyped up.
#23
Posted 10 September 2004 - 02:45 AM
ET is John's greatest work, Hook is just a footnote.
and William doesn't like ET so that is why he thought it would lose.
Joe, who remembers ET coming in 2nd to ESB in the Official JW Top 10 scores.
#24
Posted 10 September 2004 - 06:45 AM
nothing in Hook is as good as ET.
ET is John's greatest work, Hook is just a footnote.
and William doesn't like ET so that is why he thought it would lose.
Joe, who remembers ET coming in 2nd to ESB in the Official JW Top 10 scores.
But the Hook score has a lot more of memorable melodies en a freshness which E.T. lacks certainly in the middle cues (this has been mentioned before by someone).
#25
Posted 10 September 2004 - 12:55 PM
#26
Posted 10 September 2004 - 02:00 PM
----------------
Alex Cremers
#27
Posted 10 September 2004 - 05:36 PM
#28
Posted 10 September 2004 - 08:57 PM
#29
Posted 11 September 2004 - 02:00 AM
Justin - Who thinks E.T. is the better score.
#30
Posted 11 September 2004 - 03:42 AM
So the score doesn?t have the kind of balance ET does. ET earns its sentimentality. The score?s early moments are more understated and earnest. The music develops in a way that makes for a rewarding payoff because everything builds towards a natural and fitting end. The score can get away with being shamelessly manipulative for the last 20 minutes or so because we?ve bought into the experience and the music is so true to the motivations of what is unfolding on screen and to everything that came before.
Hook, in contrast, is more obvious in its manipulation and sappiness. Its not a criticism of JW to say his score follows the same lines. The score, like the film, keeps pushing are buttons over and over. So as a matter of preference, ET is better, but only because a score is going to be bound by the movie its written for. People who love the movie Hook will have gotten the perfect score I would think. And, of course, we can appreciate the score even without being a fan of the film which is essentially my view of it.
After all, its no simple feat to write a couple hours of emotionlly accessible music with distinct, emotionally direct themes and with his usual compositional integrity and with his usual attention to the demands of the film.
- Adam
#31
Posted 11 September 2004 - 04:14 AM
#32
Posted 11 September 2004 - 04:15 AM
That's just goofy Joe. Hook is a good score. Even if you don't like it you have to give it credit for the level of complexity in many of the cues.
Justin - Who thinks E.T. is the better score.
no I don't Justin, I just don't hear what everyone finds appealing about it.
#33
Posted 11 September 2004 - 06:03 AM
#34
Posted 11 September 2004 - 06:53 AM
ET is a cute little score, Hook is a monster of a score, brilliant!!!!
Cute little score??? And you are a composer?! Get outta here! Remember, your credibility is at stake here.
Or are you just saying that to pester Joe?
----------------
Alex Cremers
#35
Posted 11 September 2004 - 07:01 AM
The score for Hook has a wealth of melodic and thematic devlopment - probably more than any score he?s ever done. This makes it impressive and very accessible. Because JW is so true to whatever movie he is doing, the score takes on the strengths and faults of the movie, IMO.
So the score doesn?t have the kind of balance ET does. ET earns its sentimentality. The score?s early moments are more understated and earnest. The music develops in a way that makes for a rewarding payoff because everything builds towards a natural and fitting end. The score can get away with being shamelessly manipulative for the last 20 minutes or so because we?ve bought into the experience and the music is so true to the motivations of what is unfolding on screen and to everything that came before.
Hook, in contrast, is more obvious in its manipulation and sappiness. Its not a criticism of JW to say his score follows the same lines. The score, like the film, keeps pushing are buttons over and over. So as a matter of preference, ET is better, but only because a score is going to be bound by the movie its written for. People who love the movie Hook will have gotten the perfect score I would think. And, of course, we can appreciate the score even without being a fan of the film which is essentially my view of it.
After all, its no simple feat to write a couple hours of emotionlly accessible music with distinct, emotionally direct themes and with his usual compositional integrity and with his usual attention to the demands of the film.
- Adam
That's one clear, concise and correct analysis you gave us there, Adam! Thanks!
----------------
Alex Cremers
#36
Posted 12 September 2004 - 10:56 AM
nothing in Hook is as good as ET.
ET is John's greatest work, Hook is just a footnote.
and William doesn't like ET so that is why he thought it would lose.
Joe, who remembers ET coming in 2nd to ESB in the Official JW Top 10 scores.
1) Hook is the greater score, NOT E.T..
2) Your logic about me thinking why E.T. would lose is UTTERLY flawed Joe. I may dislike E.t., but I dislike Hook EVEN MORE. Which you should know Joe! Oh and just for the record my dislike for a film has ZERO bearin on my feelings towards a score. A score is a completely seperate entity from the film when taken by itself.
3) Regardless of what was 2nd ESB is and WILL REMAIN number 1!
May 19th 1999 ......... A DATE ...... WHICH WILL LIVE ....... IN INFAMY!
#37
Posted 12 September 2004 - 11:00 AM
nothing in Hook is as good as ET.
ET is John's greatest work, Hook is just a footnote.
and William doesn't like ET so that is why he thought it would lose.
Joe, who remembers ET coming in 2nd to ESB in the Official JW Top 10 scores.
1) Hook is the greater score, NOT E.T..
2) Your logic about me thinking why E.T. would lose is UTTERLY flawed Joe. I may dislike E.t., but I dislike Hook EVEN MORE. Which you should know Joe! Oh and just for the record my dislike for a film has ZERO bearin on my feelings towards a score. A score is a completely seperate entity from the film when taken by itself.
3) Regardless of what was 2nd ESB is and WILL REMAIN number 1!
Ok, tell me what's not good about E.T. and where it was not so great in the movie.
#38
Posted 12 September 2004 - 11:37 AM
#39
Posted 12 September 2004 - 11:52 AM
as it was perfection in the movie, the epitome of film scoring from the word go.
Amen! And just listening to the score makes this all evident.
----------------
Alex Cremers
#40
Posted 12 September 2004 - 02:23 PM
P.S. - However there is nothing on Hook that even rivals Fawkes.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











