Jump to content

Interstellar (2014 film directed by Christopher Nolan)


JoeinAR

Recommended Posts

Sigh! That's why I put more stock in the apostle crocs, Steef!

Both directors wanted to make a movie that puts the viewer into the reality of space. Both wanted the audience to experience what it's like to be up there. Both directors also have put an emphasis on the natural hostility of space, reducing man, who has conquered Earth, to a mere helpless infant. Okay, in the end, Cuaron turns man into a victor while Kubrick thought humanity needed extraterrestrial help ... but still.

Alex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think there anything superficial about it. The hostility of space (or as Kubrick calls it: "The indifference of space") is one of the most discussed themes of 2001: ASO. Also, wanting to make a movie that gives the viewer a close to real experience of being in space was a big thing for both directors. It's an important aspect of both movies which resulted in similar scenes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mad Men is still just a soap, like Dallas or Dynasty, better looking, a bit more sophisticated, but just a soap nonetheless.

If it is then it's probably the finest and most sophisticated soap of all time, alongside The Sopranos.

But hang on - don't soaps traditional revolve around a large number of characters of fairly equal importance? Mad Men focuses on Don Draper and The Sopranos is Tony Soprano's story. So do they really qualify as "soaps"? I don't think they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it obvious? I don't expect crocs, the bringer of truth, to be all that positive. It's going to be interesting to see discord in the Nolan camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you bothered reading anything we've written about the film, you'd realize it wasn't all positive...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But does Alex take your opinion seriously, KK?

Meh. Does it matter?

And yes, there'll be personal bias in everyone's experience, including yours Alex.

Not since he deemed Jodie Foster's performance in Contact brilliant!

I never said that! I said she was hot in that film!

And she was good in the film, but wouldn't describe it as brilliant...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As if one's experience of a fucking film can be free of "personal bias."

Everyone has their own preferences naturally. But some go into the cinema with an agenda. Like you did I assume. You went in determined that this film would be AWESOME.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it obvious? I don't expect crocs, the bringer of truth, to be all that positive. It's going to be interesting to see discord in the Nolan camp.

I disagree, Karol loves Inception and he'll almost certainly bum this as well. He'll act all considered and pragmatic now that I've said this of course, but he'll be in love with it really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, I went in expecting a great film.

A good deal of it was great, but some of it isn't. It didn't turn out to be the more visual storytelling project that I had hoped would push forward Nolan to a different phase in his career (one where ambiguity takes preference over plot). But in the end, it was an experience I really enjoyed, and his most personal film yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect a 7/10 movie. An entertaining flick with some good but also a few bad moments. How do you like my 'precog' review?

Surely a man of your, err... intellect is familiar with the concept of a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It didn't turn out to be the more visual storytelling project that I had hoped would push forward Nolan to a different phase in his career (one where ambiguity takes preference over plot).

You can't teach an old dog new tricks.

Surely a man of your, err... intellect is familiar with the concept of a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Look who is talking!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As if one's experience of a fucking film can be free of "personal bias."

That's true. It's just I know this film is close to your heart, since it's a marriage of several things you're crazy about (Nolan/Zimmer/Chastain/Nolan/Chastain/Nolan/Astrophysics) and hell, you've even read the screenplay. It's a already a masterpiece in your mind, it can't fail.

Because of that I'm more interested in the take of a sceptical poster. Someone who isn't all already sold on it, hook, line, and sinker. A positive review from that person would draw my attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a feeling the third act will undo the film for most people here.

The "I could have done more" act?

The "I could have visited one more planet but I was selfish and wanted to go home to my daughter and now humanity has to settle for a puny planet with little resources' act?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, because the first two acts are actually really good (even with some minor blimps). It's an experience worth checking out, even for the Nolan cynics.

The "I could have done more" act?

The "I could have visited one more planet but I was selfish and wanted to go home to my daughter and now humanity has to settle for a puny planet with little resources' act?

No. It's more like the "let's explain everything so that the audience can understand how we tried to make everything come full circle" act.

The emotional stuff was actually well handled, and even moves you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an exaggeration. There are two such "references."

The spinning ship is similar to the Orion station, but that's a stretch. And Cooper's own "Stargate" trip, which bears a similarity to Bowman's for all of a few seconds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an exaggeration. There are two such "references."

The spinning ship is similar to the Orion station, but that's a stretch. And Cooper's own "Stargate" trip, which bears a similarity to Bowman's for all of a few seconds.

Oh, i thought maybe it was more.

Anyway, in 22 hours I'll be watching the film..

Hope I don't sleep. (I slept at Transformers)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This review kind of sums up how I felt about the movie pretty well:

http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20141107-film-review-interstellar

This one, less so, but it brings up a good point about Hathaway's character:

http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2014/11/interstellar-a-preposterous-epic/382478/2/

Both basically agree that despite the film's faults is definitely a movie worth seeing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You spend money to see movies and let yourself fall asleep during them?

well, I don't spend any since I rarely go to the cinema the last years.

I have gone 4 times in the last 4 years. (Inception, Super 8, Prometheus, Tintin)

Transformers is the only movie I fell asleep. The CGI, the loudness and the constant action, made me sleep. (I lost the whole battle in the end. How i could sleep in all that loudness is admirable)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have gone 4 times in the last 4 years. (Inception, Super 8, Prometheus, Tintin)

What made you decide to skip Gravity?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have gone 4 times in the last 4 years. (Inception, Super 8, Prometheus, Tintin)

What made you decide to skip Gravity?

Hmmm...Nothing specific.. I just had a hunch that it's not a film that I'd like to pay to see (the 3D was expensive and I prefered to buy 2 Blurays at that price) and generally it fell in the general view I have that I don't like recent films and I like older better.

When I saw it at home, my views were confirmed.

Now, why am I going to see Interstellar? As I've said in another post, mostly for the company (I've become more social in the last months or so), but i think I've regretted it already..

Oh, I've also seen The Tree of Life, so that's 5 films in 4 years.

The only film now I'm really really looking forward to see, is Voyage of Time in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inception is from 2010, so it's older than everything else you're talking about (Super 8, Tree of Life, and Tintin from 2011, Prometheus from 2012)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inception is from 2010, so it's older than everything else you're talking about (Super 8, Tree of Life, and Tintin from 2011, Prometheus from 2012)

yes, that's why I said 5 movies in 4 years.

Oh, it's 5 years then, right? (2010-2014)

It's a very good film, you should definitely see it on the big screen if you can.

I will watch it in a V-max screen, that I read is the biggest in Europe. (though i doubt it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's certainly a different to what I expected. But also feels like a familiar territory for Nolan in other respects. As far as comparisons go, I would say it's neither Kubrick nor Inception. More of a Solaris by Steven Soderbergh.

Will try to put together a more coherent review over the weekend. Maybe watch the film again, even. We'll see.

Karol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I will.

What I will say here, however, is that I'm actually impressed with Zimmer's score. Not overbearing and often subtle. And not over-spotted as well. Well done, Hans!

Karol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.