Jump to content

Solving the JWFan Steep Learning Curve of Great Doom Problem


BLUMENKOHL

Good plan?  

9 members have voted

  1. 1. Good plan?

    • Aye
      8
    • Nay
      1


Recommended Posts

So . . . that qualifies as a "plan?" To not be an asshole to someone until they reach a certain post count . . . and then to choose to be an asshole after that? Do you think we'll retain a lot of newbies who, as soon as they hit #151, suddenly get pounded to dust for no reason they're aware of?

The alternative, of course--and I know I'm stretching things a bit here--is to simply not be an asshole. Like, ever. I think we'll have plenty of retention if we follow that track.

The flip side, however, involves just what your definition of "asshole" is. Some folks can't handle strong personalities. Some people can't handle a simple dissenting opinion. Let's face it, some softskins should just shut their computer down and steer clear of the interwebs. People speak their minds in places like this, and if you can't deal with that, you shouldn't be in places like this. Lively debate is what makes a subject-specific internet forum such a great place to hang out.

There's another, similar plan you could consider (if you're genuinely interested in opening the door to new members and keeping them here): instead of putting them on a learning curve with us, you could choose to put yourself on a learning curve with them. Pay attention to their posts, see where their interests are, test the waters of their particular sense of humor in some harmless fashion. See how they react to some of the more belligerent exchanges between veterans. Watch and learn how quickly they fit into the dynamic here. If we were to get, say, another BloodBoal (God help us!), he/she would probably waste little time in stirring some waters on their own, and you'd know you wouldn't have to wear kid gloves when handling them. If another younger poster, particularly a young lady, were to start breaching the water with a few experimental posts, you're probably intelligent (or at least intuitive) enough to understand that it'll take a while before she's ready to put on the spikes and kick in with the rest of the yamuckamucks. (And counting down the posts until she reaches 150 is probably the best way to ensure her speedy departure when the time comes.)

But there's one more dynamic in play that your plan doesn't account for: as we've already read from people in this thread, most folks lurk for a good while before they jump in and start posting, and most of them don't need a 150-post limit to know how things work around here. For some, there's a reason they haven't opened up yet (could have to do with some of that whole "asshole" thing). And some of them might be reading this thread and nodding their heads at the reminder of just why they've kept silent up to now, and why they'll continue to do so as a result. . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Uni were a Marvel character he'd be Italics Man ;)

That's your opinion, dude. (Pay no attention to the fact that the bold "IM" on my shirt is slanted to the right. . . .)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, post counts hold little to no value. Its all about the quality of ones contributions, not the quantity.

85af8e3e09a16bd6473e82e2bf9fde12.gif

ROTFLMAO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uni, the the alternative plan you propose picks too many nits and is too intricate to be adopted successfully en masse. Few, if any, people are going to change their habits and personalities to design custom-catered forum experiences for some newbie.

Keep it simple, and people will do it: if <150 posts, don't go out of your way to hand them their ass in an argument or bash them for liking Hans Zimmer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That misses the point. My bafflement rests altogether on the notion that we have to propose and adopt a plan en masse . . . in order to be civil and decent to people who just want to hang out and discuss our favorite subject with us. Blows my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That misses the point. My bafflement rests altogether on the notion that we have to propose and adopt a plan en masse . . . in order to be civil and decent to people who just want to hang out and discuss our favorite subject with us. Blows my mind.

I don't know where you live, but last I checked, civilization had to propose and adopt a plan en masse to keep people from murdering each other at will.

Do you by chance live in the Garden of Eden?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a newbie, I play it safe - watching from the shadows not saying much of anything.

Wise.

And never consider making a John Williams discography!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes he does!

He surely must! Because the origin or definition of every word related to what Uni describes goes back to a group of people agreeing en masse to some code of conduct! Some even have it directly in the word!

Civil! Courteous!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not what you call a civilized man. I am finished with society, for reasons I alone can appreciate. I don't obey its laws, and I suggest you never again refer to them in my presence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes! He will have thick skin and realize we're taking his error in reason and running with it like rabid wolves for fun!

But some poor lad or lass with less than 150 posts who has never faced a tag-teaming from StefanKohl? They'd be terrified! Angered! Outraged! Feeling injustice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.