Jump to content

publicist

Members
  • Posts

    17,837
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    42

Posts posted by publicist

  1. I really only look for pieces (criticism nowadays seems almost too stodgy a term in the Age of Twitter) that somehow evokes my interest, either by POV or deep-dive background knowledge - though rarely technical or formal aspects as such. That's stuff i pick up, but to have it front and center often seems to dilute the sensual qualities. What was going on in i. e. Bartok's life when he wrote a piece like the Music for Strings, Percussion and Celeste evokes my interest, or why it influenced many people at a moment in time.

  2. 6 hours ago, Richard Penna said:

    It would be like saying that the film version of Ripples would be 'unacceptable' on a TLW reissue because it's a music editor creation. The only difference? A lot of people liked that one. 

     

    If anecdotal evidence is the benchmark...

     

    The kind of often shoddily editorially created credit assemblies are on these releases because it just doesn't matter much (there's a lot of musically superfluous stuff on it, anyway). But to replace a whole batch because there are pops in it, i mean, in times of worldwide efforts to save the environment just seems a wee bit off.

  3. Thanks for another one of your schoolmarmish rebukes (i sure hope you don't have a Twitter account, Jay!) but first, the promo was released in physical form and how and under which legal status i obtained is frankly none of your business and second, i never said i enjoy it. Certainly not on a 40€ level.
     

    26 minutes ago, Jean-Baptiste Martin said:

    I agree with you @publicist. That's why the presence of the three missing songs will largely determine my interest of this new edition.
    Because they are not in the promo and will add a new touch of messiness, to use your expression.

     

    We'll see about that in the clips;)

     

    Quote

    The orchestra comes at the end of the album, if that can help motivate you. ;)

     

    It's more the stuff in the middle that defies interest. That the movie is one of those pathetic Oscar baits in which well-paid actors suffer in a deadening stiff-lipped way sure doesn't help (either the book was very good and they destroyed it in the screen version or a dud found its celluloid match).

  4. Ah ok, you possess a better subtext perception than me, obviously. If that is what he meant, of course ;).

     

    The widespread availability of the 70-minute crew promo makes this new release a bit obsolete, as it is far from Horner's best (though the liner notes, as is a custom for these kind of boutique releases, will try their best to sell it as exactly that) - maybe the sound is improved, it always struck me as a wee bit distant and muffled. 

     

    I will add, though, that there is a kind of welcome messiness to it, which became increasingly rare in the 2000's, when Horner's career trailed off into clubfooted epic meandering and languid, never-ending piano soliloquies (i still haven't made it through all of 'House and Sand and Fog'). 

  5. 13 hours ago, Bellosh said:

    Most underrated: Saving Private Ryan. I think it's a perfect score.

     

    In a 'Most Boring Solemn Americana Score ever' contest, no doubt (though that's a crowded field).

     

    'The River' is a nice, 'populist' ( in the best sense) score that i think isn't much-liked becasue the usual Williams fan considers it too pop-infested. But in a time when Williams' music started to become rather boring after the turbulent 70's, it was a good throwback.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.