Jay 37,375 Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Attempting to bring back some of the lost threads...Ricard and I have put together a web site containing a wealth of information about the new box set and the Indy scores in general. Check it out:http://www.IndianaJonesMusic.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Mark 3,631 Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Thanks you for your great work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc402 0 Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Thanks you for your great workI second that Jason, you helped a great deal with those details Thanx! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davros72 1 Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 I think I may have said this in the original thread, but it still applies...Great job!! Thank you for all your hard work, and thank you to anyone who has contributed to our overall knowledge of this music! (This board could really use a :thumbsup: smilie, I've wanted to use it several times lately.)I've used your spreadsheets as a basis for creating my own tracklists. Hopefully I'll get my set Wednesday, and spend a nice evening at the computer ripping, copying and pasting, loading into my iPod, then kickin' back and enjoying the set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,375 Posted November 11, 2008 Author Share Posted November 11, 2008 I think I may have said this in the original thread, but it still applies...Great job!! Thank you for all your hard work, and thank you to anyone who has contributed to our overall knowledge of this music! (This board could really use a :thumbsup: smilie, I've wanted to use it several times lately.)I've used your spreadsheets as a basis for creating my own tracklists. Hopefully I'll get my set Wednesday, and spend a nice evening at the computer ripping, copying and pasting, loading into my iPod, then kickin' back and enjoying the set.there is a thumbs up smiley.... just click "show all" above the small box of smilies in the left of the full reply pageThere's all kinds of stuff there... etc! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davros72 1 Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 D'oh! What an idiot. Y'know, I think I've used it in the past. Am I thinking of a different board? I don't know. Man, I'm not having a good day, am I? I remember now when I used it, it was a in reference to Natalie Portman in MissPadme's avatar. Mmmmmm....Move along, move along... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Parker 3,040 Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 ( Where can one find the dancing lock?) Thank you very much for your hard work, Jason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wojo 2,453 Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Actually, doing what I suggested here before editing it away would only get me or whoever listened to me banned, which wouldn't lock the thread, and thus not invoke the lock.If you want to find the lock, just start looking through the threads with the red arrow of death, i.e. the Closed topics.Eventually, you'll find this:http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v358/Rapseflaps/lock.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacob 0 Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Nice work on the website. I've already used it a couple times and will no doubt use it as a reference in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy4 155 Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Nice job! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incanus 5,716 Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Thank you for your great work Jason! Two thumbs up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maglorfin 196 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Wow! Bravo Jason! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry B 50 Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 About "The Raiders March" from the Raiders complete cue list...This isn't really a cue at all. The six minute "End Credits" (including the soft coda) is all that was recorded. "The Raiders March" on the original album and the Concord set is just an edit that cuts Marion's theme and the coda. The version on the DCC release is better, as it doesn't loop material in the reprise of the Raiders theme. It has a better done fadeout to eliminate the coda too, but that's on the "End Credits" track. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,375 Posted November 17, 2008 Author Share Posted November 17, 2008 About "The Raiders March" from the Raiders complete cue list...This isn't really a cue at all. The six minute "End Credits" (including the soft coda) is all that was recorded. "The Raiders March" on the original album and the Concord set is just an edit that cuts Marion's theme and the coda. The version on the DCC release is better, as it doesn't loop material in the reprise of the Raiders theme. It has a better done fadeout to eliminate the coda too, but that's on the "End Credits" track.Does everyone agree with this?I thought I remember people saying once that the short Raiders March track on the DCC had a slightly different part towards the end where it was played higher than the End Credits, if I remember correctly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkLord89 0 Posted November 17, 2008 Share Posted November 17, 2008 About "The Raiders March" from the Raiders complete cue list...This isn't really a cue at all. The six minute "End Credits" (including the soft coda) is all that was recorded. "The Raiders March" on the original album and the Concord set is just an edit that cuts Marion's theme and the coda. The version on the DCC release is better, as it doesn't loop material in the reprise of the Raiders theme. It has a better done fadeout to eliminate the coda too, but that's on the "End Credits" track.Does everyone agree with this?I thought I remember people saying once that the short Raiders March track on the DCC had a slightly different part towards the end where it was played higher than the End Credits, if I remember correctly?I was under the impression that there were two separate recordings, the End Credits as presented on the DCC and the short coda, to make the transition between tracks easier. In fact on both the DCC and the OST the coda is featured in the presentation of "The Raiders March" that comes first (the longer one on the OST and the shorter one on the DCC). It reminds me of the "1941" March coda as featured on the OST.I though agree that the shorter version could be an edit from the longer one, and on the DCC it has also the coda mixed in at the end.Matteo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric_JWFAN 11 Posted November 18, 2008 Share Posted November 18, 2008 Great, thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,375 Posted November 19, 2008 Author Share Posted November 19, 2008 Do you guys think its better to include the inserts / redone material within the body of the cue list like this:Or to have 1 version of each cue in the main body, and all the alternates at the bottom like this:? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fommes 153 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 Whatever's the most organized of the two. Alternates at the bottom? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkLord89 0 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 Do you guys think its better to include the inserts / redone material within the body of the cue list like this:Or to have 1 version of each cue in the main body, and all the alternates at the bottom like this:?I like the first choice better. It links visually, clearly and immediately inserts and alternates to the first draft of the cue.Actually if one wants to have a "complete recorded cue list" the first way is, IMHO, the better. However, if one prefers to read a "complete track list" (as if it was the track listing of a complete release of the score), alternates should go at the bottom. How we use these lists, that is a reference for the availability of cues and their chronological organisation, still makes me vote for the first option.Matteo - still amazed at the passion and effort Jason is putting in doing this research! If you need some help, count me in!P.S.: Does this mean you have found the original cue titles for Raiders as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desplat13 1 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 I vote for the first option. Alternates listed where they would have gone in the score.And thanks for all the work, Jason! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,375 Posted November 19, 2008 Author Share Posted November 19, 2008 P.S.: Does this mean you have found the original cue titles for Raiders as well? The original cue titles for Raiders have been on the site all along Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkLord89 0 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 P.S.: Does this mean you have found the original cue titles for Raiders as well? The original cue titles for Raiders have been on the site all alongSorry, my fault. I didn't remember titles such as "The Rolling Ball", "Flight to Freedom" or "The Book" being there all this time... Matteo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,375 Posted November 19, 2008 Author Share Posted November 19, 2008 The only thing I don't know are William's cue names for "The Warehouse", "End Credits", and what we assume is 8m3 Fix (Alternate).I've been listening to that track, and it doesn't line up with the film at all. It's almost just a recorded loop of that action motif, and not meant to be an actual cue. Any thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry B 50 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 It seems to replace 8M3 Fix starting at 0:15. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,375 Posted November 20, 2008 Author Share Posted November 20, 2008 About "The Raiders March" from the Raiders complete cue list...This isn't really a cue at all. The six minute "End Credits" (including the soft coda) is all that was recorded. "The Raiders March" on the original album and the Concord set is just an edit that cuts Marion's theme and the coda. The version on the DCC release is better, as it doesn't loop material in the reprise of the Raiders theme. It has a better done fadeout to eliminate the coda too, but that's on the "End Credits" track.Does everyone agree with this?I thought I remember people saying once that the short Raiders March track on the DCC had a slightly different part towards the end where it was played higher than the End Credits, if I remember correctly?I was under the impression that there were two separate recordings, the End Credits as presented on the DCC and the short coda, to make the transition between tracks easier. In fact on both the DCC and the OST the coda is featured in the presentation of "The Raiders March" that comes first (the longer one on the OST and the shorter one on the DCC). It reminds me of the "1941" March coda as featured on the OST.I though agree that the shorter version could be an edit from the longer one, and on the DCC it has also the coda mixed in at the end.MatteoLukas Kendall from FSM says:In the only masters I heard it was always a part of the full End Title recording and then dialed out for the movie but I never had access to the complete, raw takes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,375 Posted November 25, 2008 Author Share Posted November 25, 2008 Major site update, Raiders cue titles are now fixed, Temple now has the real cue names too. Missing Music page updated - turns out there's about 34 minutes of TOD music still unreleased. Check it out, and let me know if I have any mistakes!http://www.indianajonesmusic.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,375 Posted December 10, 2008 Author Share Posted December 10, 2008 Just updated the main site again. Now with IJ3 cue titles, and all the IJ1 cue titles too!Check it out and let me know if I have any mistakes in there... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fommes 153 Posted December 10, 2008 Share Posted December 10, 2008 Jason, a question, I assume with your DVD-rips, your left and right channels were in the right order when you made them into a stereo track? I'm working on your Keeping Up with the Joneses segment and it seems to work better with the channels reversed... (It's probably just a different mix for the film - or else you or Spielberg pulled a Lucas? ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,375 Posted December 10, 2008 Author Share Posted December 10, 2008 Hmmm.It's certainly possible that I mmmkayed up the channels! I dunno, I'll have to check when I'm homemmmkaying language filter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fommes 153 Posted December 10, 2008 Share Posted December 10, 2008 Edit: never mind - see below. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,375 Posted December 10, 2008 Author Share Posted December 10, 2008 Ok, no problem! - meanwhile I'm pretty sure they should indeed be reversed on that segment. Would it affect all your other rips as well or is it random?It would either be ALL rips or NO rips that are reversedIf they are off in just that one cue, that would mean that the music plays reversed in the film for that one cue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 555 Posted December 10, 2008 Share Posted December 10, 2008 It's certainly possible that I mmmkayed up the channels! I dunno, I'll have to check when I'm homemmmkaying language filter"I messed up the channels" wasn't good enough for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,375 Posted December 11, 2008 Author Share Posted December 11, 2008 Nope!Could the language filter be augmented to that f*ck becomes "frig" or "frack" or something instead of "mmmkay" ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ollie 1,059 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Or you could just type f*ck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,375 Posted December 11, 2008 Author Share Posted December 11, 2008 I shouldn't have to. I don't think this board needs a language filter at all, but that's the war. I'm just focusing on one battle right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wojo 2,453 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 The word I wrote here originally was a phonetic homonym of the F word, which doesn't get picked up by the filter, but still doesn't need stated here anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ollie 1,059 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Apparently not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Crichton 4 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Would this be the time for a colorful metaphor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unlucky Bastard 7,782 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Nobody pays attention to you unless you swear every other word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 555 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 I shouldn't have to. I don't think this board needs a language filter at all, but that's the war. I'm just focusing on one battle right now I don't think this board needs any swearing at all.If you don't like your text being filtered, don't use profanity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkLord89 0 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Could it be that the original title for The Map Room: Dawn is "Discovering the Script"? I don't know wheter "Seriph" has a particular meaning or if it even doesn't exist...Matteo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,375 Posted December 11, 2008 Author Share Posted December 11, 2008 I shouldn't have to. I don't think this board needs a language filter at all, but that's the war. I'm just focusing on one battle right now I don't think this board needs any swearing at all.If you don't like your text being filtered, don't use profanity.Hmm lemme rephrase my point of viewOK, there's gonna be no profanity on the board. Fine, I'm cool with that. But say somebody accidentally types one, or doesn't realize there's a filter. Why should "f*ck" become something that looks silly and makes no sense like "mmmkay" instead of "frig" or "frak"?Could it be that the original title for The Map Room: Dawn is "Discovering the Script"? I don't know wheter "Seriph" has a particular meaning or if it even doesn't exist...MatteoIt could be! Anybody guess at reading that handwriting is as good as mine. It's very hard to read! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 555 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 I shouldn't have to. I don't think this board needs a language filter at all, but that's the war. I'm just focusing on one battle right now I don't think this board needs any swearing at all.If you don't like your text being filtered, don't use profanity.Hmm lemme rephrase my point of viewOK, there's gonna be no profanity on the board. Fine, I'm cool with that. But say somebody accidentally types one, or doesn't realize there's a filter. Why should "f*ck" become something that looks silly and makes no sense like "mmmkay" instead of "frig" or "frak"?It's a South Park reference.But yes, it could be something else maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,375 Posted December 11, 2008 Author Share Posted December 11, 2008 i think that'd be a good idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker 5 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 I like "eff".Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 555 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Very well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,375 Posted December 11, 2008 Author Share Posted December 11, 2008 i like it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wojo 2,453 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Hugh HeffnerWow, it worked!. Before, what I typed would have been: Hugh Hmmkayner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Crichton 4 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Effing eff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Barnsbury 8 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Mothereffing bullpoo. c-word.Just testing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now