Beowulf 4 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Steven - say it aint so!http://www.darkhorizons.com/news05/050719e.php"ET" To Phone Home...AgainPosted: Tuesday July 19th, 2005 1:04amSource: WENNAuthor: Garth FranklinDrew Barrymore and director Steven Spielberg are in talks to make a sequel to the 1982 Hollywood classic "ET: The Extraterrestrial" reports WENN.Barrymore is apparently anxious to resume her role as Gertie Elliot, but only if Spielberg, who directed the first film, agrees to oversee the project. According to reports the sequel will see ET return to a now grown-up Gertie, desperate for help saving his family from extinction."Drew has spoken to Steven about it," a Hollywood insider said. "Although he thought she was joking at first, he's actually giving it serious thought. Drew thinks the world needs another feelgood movie like ET right now and she's prepared to work with Steven to make it happen."Speaks for itself.Prays to Yahweh it it isn't true...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A24 4,351 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Rumors and gossip. (sure would like to hear Williams' take on E.T. 2 though) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Lewis 6 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 That article is as valid as a wooden quarter.Gertie Elliott... If that were the real last name of the family it would make Elliott's parents plain unintelligent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker 5 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 My friend and I wrote an E.T. 2 rough draft in high school. It involved E.T.'s return while Eliott was a succesful porno producer. The end involved E.T. and Eliott escpaing on a flying bike only to get pulled into the engine of an airplane. We wrote this well before the "Sherry Bobbins" episode of The Simpsons.Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodMusician 56 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 I had to say this on another forum too:Steven S. made a contract with Universal that no sequal to ET could or would ever be made.Another thing, that is not the characters name! It is just Gertie. There is no last name listed to my knowledge.Also, I'm sure this is someone trying to get public eyes back on steven whom many say has "unfortunately left feel good movies behind." The idea of him goig back now to that genre and making one is absurd.there. I can tell you with 100% accuracy this isn't real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Barnsbury 8 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Bullocks!Ray Barnsbury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fommes 154 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 My friend and I wrote an E.T. 2 rough draft in high school. It involved E.T.'s return while Eliott was a succesful porno producer. The end involved E.T. and Eliott escpaing on a flying bike only to get pulled into the engine of an airplane. We wrote this well before the "Sherry Bobbins" episode of The Simpsons. - Are we even going to see E.T. again?- I'm sure we will, honey, I'm sure we will... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Skywalker 1,798 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 I already saw him in TPM. No any need for more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRuleOfThirds 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 I'd rather see a CE3K sequel before a ET sequel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adoy 1 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 (sure would like to hear Williams' take on E.T. 2 though)Exactly what I was thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd 30 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 mmmmmmmmmmmmm.......Drew..............Sorry...what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orrakul 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 I'd rather see a CE3K sequel before a ET sequel.I agree; I think there are more places to go with the story with a CE3K sequel than with an E.T. sequel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeshopk 8 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Neil. That sounds like a good sequel for E.T. As long as it is directed seriously and the porno/airplane death are treated with a straight face. Close Encounters sequel should include Roy Neary asking repeatedly to go home because he forgot something. Finally, he goes berzerk and the rest of the film is an hommage to the "First Blood" forest sequence, with Roy Neary taking out the aliens one by one, Green Beret style. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fommes 154 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Isn't E.T. the sequel to Close Encounters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeshopk 8 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 in a way... but in another more accurate way, it's not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoda Longbottom 0 Posted July 21, 2005 Share Posted July 21, 2005 No sequels any more, Mr. Spielberg! Please! I perhaps woudn't mind if he chose to extend upon "Always" or such, but when was the last time a director made a sequel to a great movie that was not a complete waste of time? "Terminator 2" maybe?Roman.-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted July 21, 2005 Share Posted July 21, 2005 Lethal Weapon 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pixie_twinkle 48 Posted July 21, 2005 Share Posted July 21, 2005 By this you imply that Lethal Weapon 4 was not a complete waste of time, and that Lethal Weapon was a great film. Hmmm. :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodMusician 56 Posted July 22, 2005 Share Posted July 22, 2005 I personally thought The Mummy 2 was an excellent sequal. I can assure you though, there will not be an ET 2. There's a contract that prohibits it that Steven put into effect for the express purpose not to ruin ET like so many other movies are by their sequals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orrakul 0 Posted July 23, 2005 Share Posted July 23, 2005 There's a contract that prohibits it that Steven put into effect for the express purpose not to ruin ET like so many other movies are by their sequals.I don't believe that a bad sequel ruins the original film. If a sequel sucks, just ignore it - the original film remains as good as it ever was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A24 4,351 Posted July 23, 2005 Share Posted July 23, 2005 There's a contract that prohibits it that Steven put into effect for the express purpose not to ruin ET like so many other movies are by their sequals.I don't believe that a bad sequel ruins the original film. If a sequel sucks, just ignore it - the original film remains as good as it ever was.Well, the sequels to The Matix sure took away some polish of the original. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 555 Posted July 23, 2005 Share Posted July 23, 2005 Rubbish, this sequel report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now