Jump to content

What Is The Last Film You Watched? (Older Films)


Mr. Breathmask

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, Richard said:

Modern cinema did.

 

Well, Marvel (or Disney) is the face of modern cinema and I don't see the correlation between Disney's crafty but rather commonplace action movies and the artistic comic book adaptations of Snyder (300, Watchmen). Maybe you should learn to look further than just the subject, Richard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Evil-Lyn said:

Watchmen

 

There's too much awkward sex and nudity in this. It's supposed to be a funny book movie, not softcore porn for nerds.

 

Funny? What?

 

Sometimes I'm surprised (maybe I'm mistaken) that some here have some strong pre-conceptions about what a movie must include or be about or not, instead of letting a movie explain itself with its language.

 

Sometimes I am left to wonder if maybe mainstream American cinema (best expressed in the short range of works they adapt) has at times hindered people's imaginations a bit. This has to go with that, that has to go with this and be like this. This is why Watchmen, even if as a film that doesn't work for me in several ways, is actually interesting to me.

 

I can actually kind of see and agree sometimes with where Alexcremers is coming from, it's just that 300 is horrible and Watchmen is kind of tame. I'll add there the Smallville battle from Man of Steel, which caught me off guard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Landed 2 days ago from a long flight. Got to catch up on some films on the way:

 

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2

Dumb, dumb movie.

 

Denial

Surprisingly tasteful and not as emotionally manipulative as I thought it would be. Enjoyed it.

 

Passengers

Dumb, dumb movie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sally Spectra said:

There you go again with your stereotyping. Let's face it, funny books are cheap pulp entertainment for children. The serious ones are just kidding themselves.

 

Many of the Batman films, for instance, have actually excluded the campier elements from the funny books, such as the giant penny and dinosaur in the bat cave, Batman in a grey suit with underwear on top of his pants and Robin the boy wonder. The funny books were less serious than many of the films, but the source material is so ludicrous that if you do want to make it more serious, you have to find the right balance. Like the Tim Burton films found that perfect sweet spot somewhere in between, the Schumacher's are more campy and the Nolans are more serious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Alexcremers said:

 Maybe you should learn to look further than just the subject, Richard. 

 

I do, Alex. I look to the motive, and all that I see at the moment, is pure avarice. Do anything for money, and all it can be is shit.

It's LCD  "entertainment", made "with a slide rule, and a snide smile".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nocturnal Animals

 

I kinda liked the movie within a movie more than the whole movie. Very suspenseful. But what was with those nasty, fat ugly beluga whales at the beginning? That was fuckin' nasty, man! Women as fat as that shouldn't be let out of the house, let alone dancing naked for a movie!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KK said:

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2

 

Dumb, dumb movie.

 

Am I the only here who loved this one? To me, it almost feels out of place between the other Marvel flicks

 

(I know a lot of that might just have to do with my taste in writing/design/comedy/drama/liking cartoons/themes and so on, but...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Evil-Lyn said:

Please stop responding to everything we post by pretending to be offended and morally superior, otherwise think the opposite of us and/or hyperbolically mimic us.

 

He does that a lot. Purposefully misinterpreting your posts to make you look like the bad guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sally Spectra said:

 

 to make you look like the bad guy.

 

That's not that hard to do with someone who literally has "evil" in their name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Sally Spectra said:

 

He does that a lot. Purposefully misinterpreting your posts to make you look like the bad guy.

 

I am merely giving my opinion, which I'm allowed to do as far as I'm concerned. 

Justin once told me he valued honestly. But perhaps he doesnt any more. Only when it comes from his mouth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Brónach said:

 

Am I the only here who loved this one? To me, it almost feels out of place between the other Marvel flicks

 

(I know a lot of that might just have to do with my taste in writing/design/comedy/drama/liking cartoons/themes and so on, but...)

 

I liked it a lot.  Sure it's dumb, but it's a lot fun. And I actually thought for once the "villain" storyline was pretty interesting for a Marvel movie.  So was the villain in Spider-Man: Homecoming (for an MCU film especially) so maybe they've reached a turning point with their villain problem.

 

I liked GOTG2 because it actually felt like a personal movie within all the bombast and silliness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Stefancos said:

 

I am merely giving my opinion, which I'm allowed to do as far as I'm concerned. 

Justin once told me he valued honestly. But perhaps he doesnt any more. Only when it comes from his mouth.

Also there's no misinterpreting when you plainly disrespect women and other ethnic groups. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never see anyone crying foul when I disrespect my own sex and ethnic group. As I've noted several times, I don't care about being overly sensitive and pretending to be morally superior. Those may be the times we're living in for many, but not me.

 

I say ban me.  I am clearly offensive to people here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As in they find his preferred listening experience a threat to theirs. As if they fear the labels will somehow comply only with his demands and cease to create new C&C releases. They feel if he's banned, his dissident voice will finally be silenced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stefancos said:

 

Havent businesses always listened to entitled white cis males though?

 

It's not "listening", it's "selling you things" (and sometimes also shaping people's tastes and expectations so they buy more)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that they would, obviously, but his views seem to provoke an irrational anxiety in people that his preferred album arrangements will become the governing doctrine of the labels, which seems to upset them a great deal. You can see it in the near hysterical hostility in people's posts when he dares to challenge their established viewpoints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drax and I have also faced persecution on these forums because we enjoy albums with dynamic range and don't want 2-3 hours of music with 30-second cues arranged in the order of the movie. People think it's a joke, as if there's something wrong with us for actually feeling that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.