Search the Community

There were supposed to be two sequels, now there are three. Karol

I figured since there's a topic about your recently purchased soundtracks why not have one for movies too? I recently bought all three Terminator films from Best Buy online using my Best Buy card. I will be getting them next week. I know I'm slow on getting them. There's a ton of films I still need to buy.

Disney/Pixar To Release 10 Animated Films Through 2012 All these new movies, yet no The Incredibles 2?

Continue.

I couldn't find a relevant thread with the search function (and believe me, I looked) so I'm posting this here: http://www.empireonline.com/news/feed.asp?NID=23521 If an upcoming projects thread already exists this will need moving, but if not then I guess we now have a place to discuss future movies which aren't necessarily anything to do with John Williams, Indiana Jones or Spielberg etc and all in one tidy thread.

Seemed to make sense to me to have a thread for general MCU news, rather than putting it all in Future Films thread, especially since each entry doesn't get their own thread, etc, and it's a popular film series with lots of news coming out all the time. For starters, here's a video about the various easter eggs that have been in the films This video catalogs almost every Easter egg in the Marvel Cinematic Universe

Rian Johnson will direct a modern day Agathie Christie inspired murder mystery starring Daniel Craig called "Knives Out" before regrouping with Disney for his new Star Wars trilogy

Steven Spielberg will be making a UFO movie based on an original idea with a David Koepp script. (Variety) Will this bring Johnny back to the scoring stage?

The Grudge (2020) Even die-hard J-horror fans should stay away. Despite the jump scares, fantastic cast and realistic gore, the second U.S. remake lacks any kind of tension or spooky atmosphere. Nicholas Pesce and co-writer Jeff Buhler essentially just make the victims the carrier of the Grudge (they look like refugees from 28 Days Later and The Conjuring), while dispensing with most of the uniquely Japanese elements (Kayako only appears in the beginning). He tries to do what Takashi Shimizu did with the original Japanese film (three separate storylines converging into one), but it's confusing. Even the Newton Brothers' score doesn't come close to the haunting scores Young composed for the 2004 and 2006 movies. This is a rare example where a PG-13 remake is scarier than the R-rated version.

JJ Abrams is finally directing another film. It will star Jenna Ortega and Glen Powell, bu its title and premise are not known yet https://deadline.com/2024/05/j-j-abrams-glen-powell-1235909569/ https://deadline.com/2024/08/jenna-ortega-glen-powell-jj-abrams-1236030566/ Will he reunite with Giacchino for the first time in 11 years? Michael Giacchino scored basically everything JJ Abrams directed from 2001 through 2013: Alias episodes (2001, 2002, 2003, 2005) LOST pilot episode (2004) Mission: Impossible 3 (2006) Star Trek (2009) Undercovers pilot episode (2010) Super 8 (2011) Star Trek Into Darkness (2013) Since 2013, the only films Abrams has directed are two Star Wars films scored by John Williams.

I thought this would make for an interesting thread... so here it goes. What are your favorite single shots in a movie? For me, it will always be this scene from E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial: The imagery of a bicycle in silhouette over the moon, accompanied in film by Williams' magnificent score, will always remain, in my opinion, the greatest single shot in cinema.

Absolutely hilarious movie reviews that I stumbled upon. You'd think it would be hard to sustain the humor after over an hour, but not for this guy. Check them out, unless you're turned off by profanity and, um, disturbing sequences: http://www.blancscreencinema.com/redlettermedia/phantom_menace.html'>The Phantom Menace http://www.blancscreencinema.com/redlettermedia/clones.html'>Attack of the Clones He's also done Avatar and various Star Trek films.

Yes

I think this title makes more sense than "What Is The Last Film You Watched (from 2023)", because 99% (if not 100%) of the posts are people's first watches of films of the year in question, and usually by the time you rewatch it it's an "older" film and not something you're going to find the specific yearly thread to post about Thoughts? Meanwhile, here's an article I just came across of some of the big films coming this year https://www.comingsoon.net/movies/features/1257902-comingsoons-25-most-anticipated-2023-movies Some I'm looking forward to, some I legit forgot existed despite them having buzz like over a year ago (Wonka)

Well...this stinks. http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=56314 ADMIN NOTE: Click here to jump to the point in the thread where the film was confirmed. http://www.jwfan.com/forums/index.php?/topic/19778-official-indiana-jones-5-thread-spielberg-and-ford-confirmed-opening-july-19-2019/&do=findComment&comment=1232124

Steven Spielberg to Direct Sci-Fi Epic ‘Old Man's War' after the one he’s supposed to be shooting next year. I don't know how reliable this is, but if the major trades starts reporting the same it deserves its own thread, I feel.

I guess I'll start one. I think it's the best "blockbuster" style movie of the year. One where you can actually take the stakes seriously and care about what happens and make you feel something coming out of the cinema. The actors are all top notch and you can see everyone gave it their all to elevate the movies It can be accused of being a " teen romance" movie not worthy of older people's attention, but the Star Wars and Indiana Jones movies also had romance as central elements of the films .Personally, I do not think Hunger Games has anything to do with the Twilight franchise (I saw most of them too) Catching Fire was clearly a better film than the first one, but the original Hunger Games was great too and very underrated IMO. I saw 3 trailers of blockbuster movies tonight, Godzilla, Spiderman 2 and 300part 2. All had the same CGI shots of cities and buildings falling over or being blown to bits...do we even care anymore about massive CGI destruction of cities? PS in second place is Desolation of Smaug for blockbuster this year

There are some plans for Jurassic Park IV. Spielberg seems to have a great idea, though director is yet to be announced. He said in a recent interview, that if it is made, it will be the last film in the series. I suppose that means that all the dinosaurs will die or something. It seems interesting to see an ending of the Jurassic Park series once and for all. If there will be a JP4, do you think Williams will score it??

Here's what I'll probably see this year Feb 7 - The 355 Feb 11 - Death on the Nile, I Want You Back Feb 18 - Uncharted Feb 25 - Mar 4 - Batman Mar 11 - Turning Red Mar 18 - Mar 25 - The Lost City Apr 1 - Apr 8 - Apr 15 - Fantastic Beasts Apr 22 - The Northman Apr 29 - Memory May 6 - Dr Strange 2 May 13 - May 20 - Downton Abbey 2 May 27 - Jun 3 - Jun 10 - Jurassic World 3 Jun 17 - Lightyear Jun 24 - The Black Phone Jul 1 - Jul 8 - Thor 4 Jul 15 - Bullet Train Jul 22 - Jul 29 - Black Adam Aug 5 - Aug 12 - Aug 19 - Aug 26 - Sep 2 - Sep 9 - Sep 16 - Sep 23 - Don't Worry Darling Sep 30 - Oct 7 - Spider-verse 2 Oct 14 - Oct 21 - Oct 28 - Nov 4 - The Flash, untitled David O Russel Nov 11 - Black Panther 2 Nov 18 - Nov 23 (25) - Fabelmans Dec 2 - Dec 9 - Dec 16 - Avatar 2, Aquaman 2 Dec 21 (23) - Mario Dec 25 (30) - Babylon undated: Clerks III Gray Man Cha Cha Real Smooth Emily The Criminal When You Finish Saving The World Pinocchio Pinocchio Knives Out 2 Enola Holmes 2

Welcome to the replacement for the "newer films" thread; I'll be making these one per year to discuss the films of that year; Anything older can go into the "older films" thread, unless it's a 2020 film. I don't know if any 2021 films are even out yet, but when they are out, discuss them here!

As some can deduce from the "favourite shots" thread, I re-watched the LOTR EEs earlier this week. I'd last seen them when the Blu-rays came out, so about seven years ago. I'd been excited to finally revisit them for a while, waiting for an opportunity when I would have time to watch all three films on consecutive nights. I wasn't necessarily fully in the mood for them this week and mainly watched them now because I knew I had the time, so that may have influenced my experience a bit. Still, after such a long time, I was more ambivalent about them than I was used to. On the one hand, I was more receptive to their missteps than I'd been after my first viewings of each. At the same time, I still know much of them by heart, so there was nothing to positively surprise me, and not everything had as much impact as I'd expected. Also, because I was more aware of their issues while still being so familiar with everything, I was bothered by some things I had barely noticed before. There's a shitload of out of context dialogue in these films, mostly expositional. And mostly it's even taken straight from Tolkien, only given to different characters in different situations that make you wonder why that specific character would say that specific thing now, or even be aware of it. The best visualisation of this is perhaps something that's always annoyed me: Faramir and his second in command discussing their strategy on a map of Gondor. Pointing to Osgiliath, Minas Tirith, Mordor - as if they'd even need a map to find them in the first place. And it's not even necessary for unfamiliar viewers, since the camera clearly shows those locations anyway without fingers pointing at them. There are the other familiar issues - out of context humour that's meant to lighten the mood of grave or dark sequences, which by definition has the effect of at least partly destroying that mood (goofy young Hobbit antics, comic relief Gimli). Characters acting decidedly out of character, and in fact out of everything Tolkien's moral compass for these characters dictates (Gandalf striking Denethor and actively taking command of Minas Tirith from him, Aragorn beheading the Mouth of Sauron; Elves showing up for the defence of Helm's Deep - and then either all dying (all of them?) or going home instead of aiding in the crucial Pelennor battle). Sam letting Frodo send him home (!) from the edge of Mordor (!), then tripping and breaking his skull, but seeing the missing Lembas bundle and deducing (how?) that Gollum had betrayed him (as if he didn't know), then running after Frodo, which highlights the films' often confused sense of time. Character arcs being shortened so much that they become goofy rather than tragic (Denethor). Stuff being blown out of proportion just for an iconic shot (I still like the beacons sequence, but burning Denethor running across the entire top level of Minas Tirith and climbing the balustrade just to plummet to his death; Legolas's heroic feats that make you wonder why they need entire armies at all instead of just a handful of Elves; the Ents are played nearly entirely for comic relief without the melancholy, gravitas or enigmatic other-ness (in a non-"funny", non-"obviously wrong" way) of their book counterparts). Christopher Lee is a brilliant Saruman, but his portrayal as a sadist lunatic and ally of Sauron doesn't do the character (or the fundamental concept of the Istari) justice. I still applaud the decision of incorporating the Arwen plot into the films (and the fact that they ultimately refrained from making her a badass fighter character), but the confused handling of her (non-)decision to stay with Aragorn is neither in character nor convincing (and was also badly received by non Tolkien enthusiasts). The thing is, most of these can be summed up as variations of the same basic problem: Characters acting not out of their character's motivation, but either the film's need to further a plot, or simply to entertain the audience (or lightening a mood that doesn't need lightening), i.e. characters being aware that they're in a film. And that's the most effective way to destroy any suspension of disbelief, regardless of whether the source material is something as intricate as a Tolkien story or not. But despite all this, where the films are not hampered by these things, they still work. The cast is excellent, the story (when it's not dumbed down too much) is obviously strong, the editing is mostly good (though there repeatedly are spots where actors completely switch their facial expressions and apparent mood with one edit - probably due to the extensive post production changes to pretty much everything). The locations are still so spot on that I can't bring myself to believe that these are NOT the original Middle-earth locations from the stories, and that includes the biggatures. The effects, with the exception of frequent putting Legolas on top of other things CGI shots that never looked good even in the theatre, still hold up. The scores are obviously iconic, although there are times when less might have been more. Another point that has always disappointed me is that a number of the books' most (at least to my mind) cinematic moments never made it into the films. Pippin's view of the Pelennor battle from afar being replaced by tons of exciting scenes from right inside the battle is not surprising (but considering that the battle goes ever on and on, hurts only more). Gandalf's "hour of doom" proclamation could easily have been an iconic moment of cinema and probably fell victim to the heavy intercutting between the storylines (which I think does take away a bit from the tension of the Mount Doom confrontation, given how - necessarily - uninvolving the Morannon battle is - though at least they came to their senses and didn't have Sauron battle Aragorn personally). I fully understand that sometimes (often) a film version of a story must make changes to the book to work - in fact, at least given the limited time in the films, I think they did well with Faramir (in the EE). But I strongly disagree that necessarily everything must be changed to adhere to established film conventions, especially if the book versions of certain scenes feel so cinematic that I can still picture them in my mind just like the first time I read them. With my increased awareness of the numerous flaws, not every emotional scene hit home, but most of the big ones still do and still make me cry (and I mean not just tears but genuine near-sobbing). I just wish they could do that without me being increasingly annoyed in between them. As Steef said in the other thread, they're beautifully shot, although (especially in TTT and ROTK) the rather hectic storytelling actually gets in the way and leaves many iconic locations without actually getting iconic shots. That's another thing I noticed for the first time: Never mind that the films last some 11 hours in total, they're actually too short for everything that's been crammed into them! Many important sequences that deserve enough time to make an emotional impact just fly by like a bit of exposition that has to be gotten out of the way. It doesn't help that after the lengthy TTT battle, the Pelennor battle in ROTK "had" to be even bigger and longer, taking up time that's missing for other stuff. I guess it's not that the films haven't aged well. In fact, I think they mostly have. All their problems were just as problematic when they came out. Although back then they could compensate by showing stuff that had never been seen before. That technical amazement, which distracted from the flaws, is mostly gone now, though to the films' credit that mostly means that special effects which stood out as amazing effects are now just organic components that don't stand out anymore *because* they're still convincing. But I've also always said that I hope someone will make another attempt at filming this story before long. Considering that many problems stem from having too much story to tell in too little time, having too many characters to properly portray all of them, having to constantly top a previous big battle with an even bigger one, perhaps the time is ripe for a TV adaptation. In fact, a sufficiently lengthy TV version could stick more closely to Tolkien's original structure (after all, having selected episodes take a break from the surrounding storyline to offer a standalone flashback or different perspective is a staple of contemporary TV) and thus do justice to some moments from the books that couldn't possibly have worked in the structure of the PJ films. Like, just as an example, the TTT cliffhanger at Cirith Ungol, the mere memory of which still has as much weight for me as any of the most effective moments in the films. Obviously, given the rights situation, the still healthy merchandising and the upcoming spinoff (?) series on Amazon, a LOTR series isn't in the cards at this point. But perhaps in another ten or twenty years...

Jonathan Nolan changing agents is seen by some as a move that could have once great now barely competent director Steven Spielberg choosing Interstellar as his next directoral effort. Spielberg, whose last directoral efforts is still well over a year away from hitting the screens where it will meet with minimal BO interest, has teased his fans with this and that and nothing. He's so fucking tight that he didn't make Lincoln because he couldn't get financing even though he's nearly a billionaire. BTW Jonathan Nolan, who is soon to start rewriting the legacy of Superman, has spent 2 years writing Interstellar. If the 'Berg chooses to make this film it will be a seen as a sign that a gauntlet has been thrown down by Cameron and Spielberg must pick up this challenge. Anything you do I can do better. How many times has Spielberg's next been reported?

It looks like we are about to learn even more profound truths about our very existence. Karol

Here is a space to openly talk about the new James Bond movie without using spoiler blocks at all. Feel free to also share spoiler-free thoughts in the Last Film You Watched or No Time To Die hype thread if you like, for others who might be avoiding this thread entirely until after they've seen it. Previous Spoiler Talk threads you might enjoy perusing:

Some news regarding the sequel: The first Tintin has been very successful around the world. Mr. Jackson is very caught up in The Hobbit for a while. Assuming that it’s a success in America, when do you envision a sequel being able to move forward? Is it being moved forward right now? Kennedy: Oh yeah it is being moved forward, in fact Steven and I were talking about it this morning. We’re working on a script right now, we’ll see a script probably February or March. If we can do some camera capture this summer, which I think we could do, then we would be on track to have the movie either Christmas 2014 or summer 2015, and so that’s what we’re looking at right now. http://collider.com/kathleen-kennedy-jurassic-park-4-tintin-sequel-jurassic-park-3d/130315/ It seems Jackson will do the motion-capture stuff between Hobbits... Let's hope Williams ends up scoring it.