Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Stephen Colbert is the man!

Nice glimpse of the Master of Laketown. He couldn't be more oily. Also Thranduil's throne had nice deer horns motif going on.

PJ is getting back into his Hobbity appearance. Good, good. Perhaps this means that he is getting more jovial as well as far as the scoring process goes. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you are talking about Philippa Boyens.

I still think yogurt and müsli diet PJ had after RotK turned him into a meanie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come one! Truth can be harsh! It is all in the documentaries man!

But she has really come around since then hasn't she?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But she has really come around since then hasn't she?

Not in terms of writing, it seems, unfortunately...

That's harsh dude! Really harsh!

But true, sadly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but you know what they say: truth can be harsh!

Ain't that the truth. Amen!

The film makers' plans for Mirkwood look promising if the concept art and few glimpses of the sets in the production diaries are anything to go by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“The great thing about the second movie, as with [Lord Of The Rings] The Twin Towers,

ROTFLMAO

The things that are wrong with the Hobbit production encapsuled in this one flub.

By the way, BloodBoal, I'm dissapointed you didn't pull the April Fool's joke about replacing Shore. I was sure someone would do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like there was a lack of april fools tomfoolery this year all around, outside of XKCD, reddit, and google

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PJ should go a bit further and make all the actors wear green gimp suits so they can digitally paint a more realistic image of the characters on top of that. Gandalf, Bilbo and Thorin look so fake in the film now. CG would give them more realism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Hobbit's Baddie Talks!

And we have another confirmation that Azog will be in all three films:

You're heading back to New Zealand this summer to shoot more scenes. Can you give any hints about what they'll involve?

Not really, because I've not yet seen the scripts. But Peter's told me that he's going to build Azog up over the next two films, so I'm getting plenty to do.

Great. So a baddie that wasn't even in the book will probably end up having more screentime than Smaug, Saruman or even Sauron. How cool is that?

Uncool bro, uncool.

While Azog is the least of the film's troubles I found that his inclusion into the plot was quite forced when a solution closer to Tolkien might have been found.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honesty what is wrong with Azog?

Closer to Tolkien? What do you mean?

Azog should be dead and buried. I feel that having him resurrected after 100 years of being dead by whatever means to become the main antagonist of the story is a bit forced that's all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is really only an issue if you are a serious Tolkien nut. They could have had the exact same character, give him a different name like Gorlurz or something and no one would complain

Structurally having a identifiable villain in the first film before they get to the dragon is a good idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is really only an issue if you are a serious Tolkien nut. They could have had the exact same character, give him a different name like Gorlurz or something and no one would complain

Structurally having a identifiable villain in the first film before they get to the dragon is a good idea.

I agree that having an identifiable villain is good. Especially as a driving force, which the novel doesn't have as such as the company stumbles into these small episodic adventures along the way. They just could have handled it with more loyalty to Tolkien's writing instead of going on a wild tangent with Azog and his sudden resurrection. I have already mentioned Bolg as a more logical and even more in line with Tolkien's concepts as a preferable villain but I guess we have to settle on the Hook-Hand Harry and his warg pack of gloom.

But as you say most people don't care about these things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, so if they had the exact same character, but named him Bolg, it would have been fine with you?

No not quite. I would have demanded a more elaborate exposition for his hatred for Thorin, perhaps a logical motivation to avenge his father Azog and in the later films the villain might have seen that he could achieve both the destruction of his enemy's kingdom and steal his treasures and also kill him so he raises the armies of Orcs to assault the Lonely Mountain for twofold purpose. More faithful to Tolkien and would have achieved a good effect. Now we have this albino zombie/hook handed creature, who just wants the Dwarves dead because he can.

But I am sure the whole "Azog was raised from dead by Necromancer or is at least in cahoots with him" subplot will become apparent in the next film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.