Jump to content

Lost


Mr. Breathmask

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You mean his normal, character accent or the actor's normal British accent? :thumbup: It was only three words but it sounded like the latter for me, not that I interpreted it as meaning anything other than the actor spluttering the line the best he could and it just kind sounded British.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I -finally- saw the season 6 opener, and what can I say but WOW! I had literally avoided all spoilers (apart from the title of the episode), so it was great coming into this fresh. It's one thing to build up expectations so highly, but another to really fulfil them, and from the looks of it, Lost will continue to transcend all expectations. I saw the two different alternate timelines coming; but now I'm wondering about the precise nature of these flashsideways, and that'll be the central question of the season, I guess. Perhaps they're flashforwards instead of flashsideways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK let's talk about the temple.

There's a pool of water there that appears to be able to heal people. It must have been what was used to heal Ben in 1977. However, it appears to somehow turn people into Others, right? Ben was an Other after that, and so was Rousseau's crew.

No, it heals and wipes out recent memory, but does not turn people into Others; they ask to join them, like young Ben did before being shot, or are picked by the Others.

Rousseau's team, on the other hand, was abducted by the Smoke Monster and either driven crazy by him or replaced by it.

As far as we know the Spring indeed heals people and what can be surmised from young Ben's reaction and Sayid's line after he wakes up, wipes out their memory, but also permanently links them to the Others. Unless there is another way to heal people at the Temple.

This is more or less what Richard says when Sawyer and Kate bring wounded Ben to him and he agrees to save his life.

Richard: If I take him, he's not ever be going to be same again.

Kate: What do you mean by that?

Richard: What I mean is that, he'll forget this ever happened and that his innocence will be gone. He'll always be one of us.

This would indicate that the people healed at the Temple are irrevocably changed, become Others in some way, they are changed into those who protect the Island. Another Lost mythology detail that is probably cleared this season with Sayid's resurrection which as per usual to Lost was not exactly an ordinary event or went as planned by the Others who seemed pretty shocked by it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richard: What I mean is that, he'll forget this ever happened and that his innocence will be gone. He'll always be one of us.

Oh right, how could I forget this?! Thanks, Icanus!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be this has already been suggested here or elsewhere, but...I wonder if the destruction of the statue of Tawaret had to do with all the difficulties pregnant women have had on the Island. Tawaret was associated with fertility...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea Ben said on-screen that the statue was already reduced to a foot when he arrived (in 1973)... Darlton just confirmed that he wasn't lying.

I've been thinking about that statue. The conclusion that I came to was that the island has ALWAYS had fertility problems, so the Egyptians (that I believe to be the first people to arrive there) built the Tawaret statue to try to appease the gods and allow them to have children on the island. I assumed that it didn't work, however. It was only ever just a statue.

I had forgotten until you just mentioned it that Ethan was born on the island, though. Who else has been born there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, we don't know with 100% certainty that Ethan was conceived on the Island, but he probably was.

Also, I had a really funny/awkward moment earlier today. So, I was sitting in a C++ programming lecture. My professor loooooves Star Wars and is sure to include numerous photos and references in every slide. Today, one of the images was a piece of clip art showing books that he'd given titles to. Most of them were Star Wars references, but one was Watership Down. Having just been watching some of the S1 features yesterday, my mind of course immediately flashed to Sawyer reading Boone's copy. After class, I asked the professor, "So, are you a Lost fan?" (He seemed to have the right disposition, and the folks who make Lost love Star Wars...) He gave me a confused look and told me he'd watched a bit in the first few seasons but that was it. I then asked him why he included Watership Down with all the Star Wars, and he just said flatly, "I like the book." I kinda walked away awkwardly. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, we don't know with 100% certainty that Ethan was conceived on the Island, but he probably was.

Also, I had a really funny/awkward moment earlier today. So, I was sitting in a C++ programming lecture. My professor loooooves Star Wars and is sure to include numerous photos and references in every slide. Today, one of the images was a piece of clip art showing books that he'd given titles to. Most of them were Star Wars references, but one was Watership Down. Having just been watching some of the S1 features yesterday, my mind of course immediately flashed to Sawyer reading Boone's copy. After class, I asked the professor, "So, are you a Lost fan?" (He seemed to have the right disposition, and the folks who make Lost love Star Wars...) He gave me a confused look and told me he'd watched a bit in the first few seasons but that was it. I then asked him why he included Watership Down with all the Star Wars, and he just said flatly, "I like the book." I kinda walked away awkwardly. ;)

I have not read this book, but about it, since reading about Lost. Didn't you explicit him the connection? He might have been interested in revisiting the series, knowing it. You could print out a not too spoilerish text from Lostpedia on the subject and give it to him so that he may understand why you asked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been thinking about that statue. The conclusion that I came to was that the island has ALWAYS had fertility problems, so the Egyptians (that I believe to be the first people to arrive there) built the Tawaret statue to try to appease the gods and allow them to have children on the island. I assumed that it didn't work, however. It was only ever just a statue.

I wonder myself what connection the statue has to Jacob. He does live under the thing, after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the scene was perfect. The way they did it worked, it's just that all this time we've never known where the Smoke would be at any given point. He obviously has to come from somewhere (most likely that room under The Temple), and the way they shot it made it seem like it came from some other room/outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was an awesome moment of revelation when Man in Black was first shot, actually looking slightly surprised, then ducked behind a pilar and vanished, leaving an obviously flattened bullet behind, like it had hit something hard and then Smokey appeared. You could put two and two together at that moment because it was just too much of coincidence the Black Smoke appears when Man in Black disappears. And of course the final confirmation was the Man in Black saying: I'm sorry you had to see me like that." Heavy handed exposition handled with care and certain glee I think, finally confirming one of the theories surrounding one of the biggest unsolved mysteries of the Island. And indeed Smokey appears in the hallway which leads outside the Statue, the same route Ben and Man in Black came in. And of course for a creature who can vanish into thin air and appear as a cloud of smoke, the leap from behind the statue to the hallway is not a big leap at all. And I have to admit, Smokey coming from the hallway, first the usual chattering sounds and then the actual Monster makes for a great entrance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know...that was such a crushing (but good!) scene. I especially loved how he kept leaning in and out of the light - a living demonstration of the ongoing "black and white" theme.

EDIT: And boy, is Terry O'Quinn pulling out some great mean faces for this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know...that was such a crushing (but good!) scene. I especially loved how he kept leaning in and out of the light - a living demonstration of the ongoing "black and white" theme.

EDIT: And boy, is Terry O'Quinn pulling out some great mean faces for this!

As I said in a previous post, I loved that scene because it was made all the more crushing by the fact that it was fake Locke so coldly ridiculing the actual Locke. It is so much more effective and cruel to see him and hear him berate the dead man in his guise as if to mock him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what I love most about Lost? It's how it avoids clear-cut answers. There's no right or wrong on this show. You see, John Locke might be dead, but in a way, he got exactly what he wanted: greater destiny. There is always this ironic "yes and no" answer to every question, almost mirroring the black and white motif. And that's why I think Man in Black is neither good or bad.

Karol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he didn't do anything wrong... I think we're should believe that's the case. Ot that they're both bad. You have to remember most of the characters on the show might be good, but sometimes they do commit great atrocities. Like Sayid, or Sawyer, or Kate, or even Sun. I think that's one of the main themes of the show. The other thing is there is a great deal of red herrings. The actors (while shooting ep13) don't know what's going on.

Karol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said he was different from the main characters, just that he was bad. Let's not forget the things he did in smoke monster form - killed the pilot, killed Eko, killed Nadine, chased numerous other characters, etc. This guy was the show's first big mystery and first big antagonist, all the way back in "Pilot, Part 1."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand, but then "redemption" is the most tossed around words when it comes to the final season. I like to believe that, because I agree on most of what he's saying. Like when he explained to Ben why he should kill Jacob. Makes complete sense to me.

Karol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said he was different from the main characters, just that he was bad. Let's not forget the things he did in smoke monster form - killed the pilot, killed Eko, killed Nadine, chased numerous other characters, etc. This guy was the show's first big mystery and first big antagonist, all the way back in "Pilot, Part 1."

It is of course worth noting this Monster must have gone through a long development in the show itself, from vague threat to the main villain. As the show evolved the Monster has evolved. The writers have done a good job with the character, using it along the way, hinting at some things, leaving the door open for many possibilities.

As the whole story thusfar goes, in retrospect, the Monster seems to have tested individuals for his own purposes, weighing how easily they can be manipulated and are they useful. We not know his createria of elimination because the entity is clearly near omniscient, describing to us even Locke's last thoughts in detail. So perhaps his ideas about good and evil are beyond human as well. His final motives are to be revealed, his "friendship" with Jacob unexplained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wouldn't surprise me if one of the twists later on this season is that Jacob is the bad guy and the Man In Black is the good guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be typical of the show. It's worth pointing out how they introduce things in the show, like The Others for example. They were dangerous throughout the first two seasons. But then we learned they live in these cozy houses and have book clubs. So it might be the same with the smoke monster.

Karol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, it's possible they'll turn it around and have Jacob be the bad guy. That's what I was expecting when Locke said he was going to kill Jacob. I'm just saying that in terms of real-world morality, all the facts point toward the man in black being a bad guy, regardless of who else is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's more likely that Jacob is the good guy with a certain project which unfortunately needs sacrifices (much like Jack's plans are full of good intentions, but they always fail and have victims in the end), while MiB is the bad guy, with a redeeming goal (obviously, he really wants to go home).

Home, by the way, may well be on the island itself: perhaps it's the temple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was just under the temple a few episodes ago when he judged Ben.

Also the temple dwellers didn't put up the protective ash until after they learned Jacob was dead last week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which makes it weird that no one noticed them going there in the season 5. The Others went there waaaay back in season 3.

Karol - who would be a tad disappointed if the whole show could be boiled down to a simple good-evil battle (so lame)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, home is probably not the temple, unless Jacob kept him out in one way or another. But did they go underneath the actual temple in the season 5 finale, or was that in the tunnels at the temple wall? Wasn't all that clear...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a good vs evil battle is what brought a lot of our characters TO the island, that doesn't change the development the characters went through there and the choices we've seen them make

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Karol - who would be a tad disappointed if the whole show could be boiled down to a simple good-evil battle (so lame)

Well the Good vs Evil is one of the main themes of the series, classical universal theme, but this series has never provided just straightforward answers, the characters as you say have never been clear cut good or evil, all shades of grey exist. The series goes to show this by letting us see the other perspective. But then there is a feel of what we could call universally acknowledged good and evil that do battle in this series. It certainly forms one central ring in this story. But I am sure it is but one layer in all this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, yes. That's what I'm hoping for: that it's not that simple. I witnessed one series finale that tries to wrap thing way too easily and it wasn't good at all.

Karol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, yes. That's what I'm hoping for: that it's not that simple. I witnessed one series finale that tries to wrap thing way too easily and it wasn't good at all.

Karol

One thing I'm fairly certain is that it won't be that simple, because things rarely ever are in Lost. Likewise I don't think the Jacob/Man in Black conflict is so simplistic, neither of them seem exclusively good or evil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally caught up on Lost. I started watching it, from the first season, toward the end of last year, and was able to catch up for the second week of the final season. I kept looking at this thread, but restraining myself, knowing it must be full of spoilers, but now I have been reading through old posts, and laughing at people's speculation of what was going on, and what would happen. So many wrong theories floating around. It's what Lost is all about, and kinda fun to read.

Anyways, just watched the new episode, and I must say, the cliff-hangers are WAY more effective when you don't have the next episode right at your finger-tips :P Overall, I thought it was a very good episode. When I first heard that they were going to try to make season 6 more like season 1, I was very excited, because that is by far my favorite season so far. When I saw LA X 1 and 2, I was a little disappointed, as I realized what exactly they meant by like it, and I was hoping for something a little more character and suspense driven and less sci-fi. But, after watching this one, and seeing a little further progression with the new form of 'flash back', I am starting to get very excited again. This season could, indeed, raise the show back to the level of the first season, though in a different way.

So anyways, I'm very happy to be all caught up and able to take part in the Lost discussions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.