Jump to content

Indiana Jones set: your opinion & recommendation?


Olivier

Indiana Jones set: your recommendation?  

51 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you advise?

    • A must-buy, without the shadow of a doubt. Perfect on all counts.
      6
    • A great buy. Some undeniable flaws, but all the good easily outweighs the bad, and the wav files can be tweaked enough to correct or tone down the flaws.
      29
    • The music is awesome, and we may never get another chance to have it all before long. For all its flaws, it's still better than the previous editions, overall.
      13
    • As splendid as the music is, the previous editions are a better way of enjoying it, even though there is less. Maybe the single disc editions will be better.
      1
    • Even the greatest music in the world and the cheapest price cannot atone for such a poorly produced set. Let's wait another ten years for 2CD releases and hope they will finally be done right. Like Star Wars, there is bound to be such an edition sooner or later.
      2


Recommended Posts

All those thousand-page threads (on FSM & Intrada's boards and here-- and surely elsewhere I don't visit) with millions of messages are interesting and informative but hard to follow (millions of new messages to read every day just on this topic!) and disheartening:

- It's a great set with new music,

- but strange edits have been carried over or made,

- great cues which would only have taken a handful of seconds' disc space (bridge percussion) are missing,

- even though there is plenty of room left,

- and there appears to be sound issues on some tracks.

I want these scores, and I understand that showing support is the best way to eventually have complete 2CD editions, and that this set may even be the only thing we'll have ever or for another 30 years, but darn if all this is not disappointing.

Hence this poll (my first one, so I'm not sure I have wrangled those titles, questions and choices correctly).

Thanks for your input!

obndy0001.gif

PS: it did not work :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Option 2, without the shadow of a doubt.

Although i'm one of the individuals who couldn't care less about percussion cues, uninteresting snooping-around music or 30 second cues - it was not all gold Williams produced here...minor sound anomalies are my biggest gripe.

And seemingly some intro's and endings seem a bit abrupt, as if they've used CoolEdit's fade-in option. But if that has something to do with the condition of the mastertapes we don't know for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3

It's the first I've heard of most of the ToD score, and overall, there's so much music in vastly improved quality that it's a great buy.

But, whether they be financial/master tape/legal issues, they messed some stuff up that keeps it from top marks, and should've got someone else to select/edit material who didn't have Williams' tendencies in mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a must buy, although I don't agree it's great. There are some issues.

But if you have the money and are a Williams fan then this is a must buy for the music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well,after months of mini freak outs and crisis on what we were getting or not, I'd say things turned out pretty well

May:unreleased ToD music in Lego game and FSM podcast: Hopes that expanded releases are on the way

June:Concord plans to re-issue OST's only ,hopes crushed

September: box set officially announced :

1)Only Raiders expanded?

2)The press release fiasco

3)unreleased music only on disk 5? Disk 2 and 3 just OST's?

4)Things looking good ,still no track list for Disk 5 (no Return to the Village? no Power of the Grail? )

5)Raiders fake leak :sound quality worse than DCC

6) all track lists released ,only a few cues missing and a few mistakes

7)release:overall sound quality better than expected

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for these first replies! I'm sure there will be more votes.

I appreciate your concise answers and explanations; no need to launch onther megathread here.

:mellow:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unlike those who think 2 c.d. sets will appear in a few years ,I think this is probably the last release we'll of these scores.

I'm undecided on this one. :mellow:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Option 2. The flaws and criticisms are mostly minor, and there is a treasure trove of great unreleased music we've been waiting pretty much our whole Williams listening lives for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The set's great for what we got, all the new material (regardless of whether it's the film version and whatnot) and improved sound quality. I gave it no second thought when I read the press release and I don't regret spending one penny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unlike those who think 2 c.d. sets will appear in a few years ,I think this is probably the last release we'll of these scores.

The only extra material I'd want would be the 5 or 6 cues I'm keeping from the Crusade boot in CD quality. Apart from that, I'm pretty happy with what I've managed to do with the set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well,after months of mini freak outs and crisis on what we were getting or not, I'd say things turned out pretty well

May:unreleased ToD music in Lego game and FSM podcast: Hopes that expanded releases are on the way

June:Concord plans to re-issue OST's only ,hopes crushed

September: box set officially announced :

1)Only Raiders expanded?

2)The press release fiasco

3)unreleased music only on disk 5? Disk 2 and 3 just OST's?

4)Things looking good ,still no track list for Disk 5 (no Return to the Village? no Power of the Grail? )

5)Raiders fake leak :sound quality worse than DCC

6) all track lists released ,only a few cues missing and a few mistakes

7)release:overall sound quality better than expected

That's a good summary of the long, strange roller coaster ride this release has been. I've never experienced anything like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course there were those of us who didn't panic, kept our cool and suspected there was a chance that these might be expanded, but stressed for people to wait for the Indy hype from the summer to die down and see what plans Concord had for the set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you again for your answers! The results are interesting and make things a bit clearer after all those heartbreaking pages listing the strange decisions and flaws.

at first i thought 3 but now i feel more like option five :P

Since reading all those accounts, I have been torn between waiting for a better edition and buying it before it runs out of print in case it's the only one we get.

I suppose the latter will have to be my decision, but it hurts, even if I can get it for a reasonable price; I cannot imagine how so many wrong decisions could be made-- starting with a trivial but eventually symbolical detail: how could one botch up a cover by printing the art half size (and for one cover only! it is not even a consistent artisitc decision)?! why no true liner notes (from what I have read, there is no such thing)?!

It is utterly baffling and sad.

- PS -

It has only just occurred to me I should have included these as first and last options, for the fun of it:

"You are not a true John Williams fan if you do not buy this magnifcent set and acknowledge its divine quality."

"You are not a true John Williams fan if you buy this hellish set and do not curse it for its evil foulness."

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cannot imagine how so many wrong decisions could be made-- starting with a trivial but eventually symbolical detail: how could one botch up a cover by printing the art half size (and for one cover only! it is not even a consistent artisitc decision)?!

I'm assuming you're referring to the TLC cover, which was actually a picture error - the actual cover I believe is identical to the original.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow ,there's 3 people who'd rather keep their old OST's instead of having all this amazing new music to listen to . You'd think this set is worse than the TPM Ultimate Edition

It is beyond me that some people would be so intransigent to outright reject this box set and can't find any redeeming value to it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOTR set the standards for expanded/complete scores.

Actually, the Superman Box does; I think there are some editing issues with the LOTR boxes as well, but frankly, there's so much music on them that I don't really care. And apparently we're getting the rest later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow ,there's 3 people who'd rather keep their old OST's instead of having all this amazing new music to listen to . You'd think this set is worse than the TPM Ultimate Edition

It is beyond me that some people would be so intransigent to outright reject this box set and can't find any redeeming value to it

Indeed.

BTW I don't think anything can be worse than the monstrosity called the Phantom Menace "Ultimate Edition".

LOTR set the standards for expanded/complete scores.

Actually, the Superman Box does; I think there are some editing issues with the LOTR boxes as well, but frankly, there's so much music on them that I don't really care. And apparently we're getting the rest later.

I never noticed any editing issues with the LOTR sets. Anyways fommes' statement is more accurate that the Superman Blue Box sets the standard of how complete/expanded scores should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So, I finally listened to Raiders today - I saved it for last since that soundtrack had the least expansion - and I'm laying in bed, enjoying it. I get to Indy Rides the Statue and notice that its missing the Raider's March theme at the end. "Oh well", I thought to myself "It really should be there, but I guess it was something tracked in later in post post production." That should have been my clue to horror that was about to befall me in "Chasing the Truck." I laid there, in bed, enjoying when, all of a sudden, like a butcher to a side of beef, I hear to my horror that it has been....EDITED!!!!! And not just edited, but edited BADLY!! It's not even a musical edit!

Why, I ask!!!? Oh WHY did they have to chop it! There's no reason! It was complete in the DDC release, why chop it now!? And what makes it worse is that its my favorite cue of the entire score. Bad! Bad Concord!

So, I guess I'll be sticking with my DDC release. Having "Bad Dates" just isn't worth the chop job the did on Raider's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Williams only revised and recorded half of "Indy Rides the Statue," which is what you get on the Concord set. This revised cue was meant to crossfade into the original cue around the 1:00 mark for Marion's mummy shenanigans, but the original cue is unreleased (*cough* sort of).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on what your view of complete is. Desert Chase I can accept, because it was originally recorded as the DCC version (well, separated into three parts that is), so the editing is bogus. Indy Rides The Statue... it's a mix of original and tracked music. The cue is complete because that is the original version (well, the original version of the fix. I think. This is complicated.) In any case, it's what was originally recorded. It's like complaining "Snowspeeders Take Flight" is incomplete because it doesn't include the music tracked from "Hyperspace".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I guess I'll be sticking with my DDC release. Having "Bad Dates" just isn't worth the chop job the did on Raider's.

Why pick one when you can have both?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...Desert Chase I can accept, because it was originally recorded as the DCC version (well, separated into three parts that is), so the editing is bogus...

Agreed.

Also, if that's what the USS Enterprise is going to look like in the upcoming Star Trek movie, I have a feeling I'm not going to like that reboot either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.