Jump to content

Jazzy Potter


fommes

Recommended Posts

Yeah the votes do not promise anything good and I had also a bad feeling about the album just by looking at the name "Harry Potter Jazz:The Sorcerer's Stone". Though I do not have the faintest clue how the jazz versions of Williams' themes would sound the voters (all 8 of them) seem to think they suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm not sure about this (and the user votes). you also have to take into account how much the voters liked jazz i guess. btw, has anyone every listened to The Star Wars Trilogy by the Trotter Trio? Yup, star wars, in jazz. this could be something like that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How pointless...

Pointless? Why?

Marian - ?

They've taken music with such diverse feelings and emotion and made it all sound the same. What's the point in "Voldemort" if you lose all sinister or dark aspects of the music? "Family Portrait" is the same, it has none of the tenderness and emotion the theme and its harmonisation was written to have.

It may sound nice to some, but I find it pointless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The jazzy versions do not sound all that great. The material is of course good but jazz variations do not work for the themes. To me it sounds hokey. I like jazz but the pieces I heard from Potter album are too pretentious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, jazz music serves a different function then music in a "classicaly" writtent sense. If you took a bunch of Chopin waltzes and jazzed them up, you lose a lot of flavor and beat puncuations. If you do the same to a nocturne, you lose the smooth flow, almost like water through your body. So in that sense, yes, I don't think it makes the pieces better, but I don't have anything against trying to do something different. I would say it's the same if you take a popular jazz piece and flatten it into a classical pancake. It won't sound right. There's definitely an audience for this type of stuff though.

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are quite right. I could articulate my thoughts about it but you did it better (not to mention faster than I). I share your sentiment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's called "Interpretation"......

.....and I don't tend to hear many people moan about Williams interpreting stuff.....

.....admittedly, that's somewhat different (and this is a Williams Fanpage after all....), but the principal is the same.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sincerelly, I don't know what's the problem with people around here. This is quiet great stuff. Maybe not the best jazz in the world, but still a great listen -- believing on the samples.

The Trotter Trio disc is also a must. Love those variations on Star Wars tunes -- the best jazz variations on Williams music I've found.

For those concerned with the trasnfer of classical oriented music to the jazz idiom... even classic purists tend to like the Jacques Loussier jazzy interpretations of Bach music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with Miguel. I was prepared for the worst after your reactions, but this 'd make for a great listen on CD. If I come across it, it's definitely mine :) I have no problems whatsoever with this 'adaptation' to jazz. It's not your usual rerecording stuff, it's a new interpretation. It doesn't have to sound right in my opinion, you shouldn't actually compare it to the soundtracks, not because it would fail the comparison, but because it's specific in its own right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those concerned with the trasnfer of classical oriented music to the jazz idiom... even classic purists tend to like the Jacques Loussier jazzy interpretations of Bach music.

I hate classical purists!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those concerned with the trasnfer of classical oriented music to the jazz idiom... even classic purists tend to like the Jacques Loussier jazzy interpretations of Bach music.

And they call themselves classic purists after that ? The nomenclature implies they do not enjoy anything outside classical presentrations of classical music. And then they enjoy Bach jazz interpretations? LOL

I for one enjoy jazz but these Potter pieces are what I call lounge jazz. THey are jazz but not there with the best not by a long shot. People can play this music and I think they should do it as it is a form of artistic expression and we all have a free will to do it but I do not have to like it.

The idea is the same as with many "classic" jazz pieces that take a well known piece of music and transform it to a jazz piece. For some pieces of music it works and others it does not. For me Potter jazz just does not work. Perhaps I simply can't accept Williams classic themes in jazz guise. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've taken music with such diverse feelings and emotion and made it all sound the same. What's the point in "Voldemort" if you lose all sinister or dark aspects of the music? "Family Portrait" is the same, it has none of the tenderness and emotion the theme and its harmonisation was written to have.

I don't know if you've heard clips or not (I haven't), but your comments seem to refer to the general idea of making jazz variations of orchestral music - which I find anything but pointless. For one thing, the whole point *is* to put them in a totally different context. That's what themes are about basically, too. It would be more pointless to just re-record the same thing the same way over and over again. Writing variations on them is a very interesting concept.

Of course, I haven't heard these, and they might be poorly done. That still wouldn't make them pointless, IMHO, just poorly executed. I also have the Trotter Trio Star Wars CD and find it nice, but not that amazing (I admit I rarely listen to it). On the other hand, I have a CD of jazz arrangements of Bruckner symphonies, and those are absolutely amazing.

Marian - happy about everyone who attempts this kind of thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind different interpretations at all, but the themes completly lose their ambinace. You can enjoy this from a technical musical point of view, but I can't as an uneducated (and far from being a Jazz lover). When Voldemort conveys the same kind of feel than Harry's wondrous World, something must no be quite right, but hey, maybe that's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand the points, regarding the change of feel. But if you put that aside, wouldn't you be able to enjoy this jazz variations? Just a thought...

Miguel, who will get Romão a copy of the Trotter Trio take on Star Wars, along with all that other stuff I've already promissed him :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess that's quiet natural, him being american, and jazz being an american musical expression. Many of his works have a jazzy feel rooted deep inside them. I've been studying his Sinfonietta latelly, and there's lot os jazz influences in there, even if on early listens you can't ear them that much.

And then he has some all way jazz scores, like his early Checkmate, or his first film score, Daddy-O.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love acessible Jazz. I don't draw any pleasure at all hearing an essemble making all sorts of improvisations and smilling to each other like they're making love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, there are all kind of jazz... there is big orchestral one!

So everyone can enjoy his jazz. And most people I know around, who are classical music lovers, are for the msot part, jazz lovers.

But then again, they don't enjoy every kind of "classical" music, just as they don't love every kind of Jazz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I admit: I have some unfair prejudices with Jazz. Maybe I simply haven't listened to the right stuff. I love John Zorn. I loved Catch me if You can and Checkmate. But I can't enjoy Patt Metheny, for instance. BUt I would never go as far as to say his music has no merit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but that just makes no sense at all.  

Usually John Williams scores are performed by a big orchestra, not a jazz ensemble.  

People who like orchestral music are not always gonna love Jazz.

I think he meant that Williams' chord progressions etc. share similarities to those that characterise jazz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Lotman. That's what I meant. Just need to hear "Schindler's List", for example.

Marian - who could never quite get into CMIYC.

I think the score sounds a little... artificial. Don't you think so?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I know this is a comment full of prejudices, but around where I live, there isn't a more pretentious or elitist group of people than the Jazz sub culture. Not the music's fault, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I know this is a comment full of prejudices, but around where I live, there isn't a more pretentious or elitist group of people than the Jazz sub culture. Not the music's fault, really.

I understand what you mean, and I guess everyone has faced that in someway -- music related or not. But you should try to see beyond that, beyond the people, and really try to focus on the music. I promisse you years of joy and musical excitment if you achieve that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I'm hardly a Jazz buff, but if I remmeber correctly, the newspaper you read is publishing a quiet interesting collection of Jazz CDs. It seems to me that they present the who's who of Jazz.

There are some names that you can check out as they are Jazz legends, like Gillespie, Monk, Coltrane, guys like those.

And if your in a mood to know what Williams enjoyed himslef, check Art Tatum and Eric Dolphy -- he spoke highly of both of them and as even went on saying how they influenced his playing and composition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well this has turned a bit controversal!

I understand the points, regarding the change of feel. But if you put that aside, wouldn't you be able to enjoy this jazz variations? Just a thought...

Miguel makes a valid point. If I hadn't heard these themes in their proper form (if at all) before these versions, I'd enjoy it. I still like it, but having heard and played all of them on piano (they're the exact arrangements from the book) I enjoy it less. I should try and make the effort, and maybe even try find the album!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.