Alex Shore 83 Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gkgyver 1,646 Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Are you looking for a mate, or why are you posting this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Shore 83 Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 A pic from the EE.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixon Hill 4,234 Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 What a bonnie Elven lass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gkgyver 1,646 Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 She reminds me of someone. She looks really familiar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixon Hill 4,234 Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Is it Jackson's daughter? Didn't she play a Rivendell musician? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Shore 83 Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Is it Jackson's daughter? Didn't she play a Rivendell musician?No... Katie Jackson and Fran Walsh are hobbits... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gkgyver 1,646 Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 She kind of has Howard Shore's nose. Could she ...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixon Hill 4,234 Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 She looks a little like an Elvish Hailee Steinfeld. Maybe that's who I'm thinking of Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faleel 5,459 Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 The Naked dwarf EE pic is a definite DELETE, DELETE, DELETE moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Shore 83 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 The Naked dwarf EE pic is a definite DELETE, DELETE, DELETE moment.The CGI naked dwarf... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faleel 5,459 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Still... :folder: :folder: :folder: :folder: :folder: :folder: :folder: :folder: :folder: :folder: :folder: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixon Hill 4,234 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Damn, I was hoping that would utterly transform the film Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incanus 5,736 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Again it doesn't really come as a huge surprise when they still have one entire sequel still coming up. As PJ said in one recent interview they can hit the ground running this time and just go off without a huge amount of background exposition to worry about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 And making the theatrical version shorter means more additional minutes for the EE! Woohoo...(?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incanus 5,736 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 And making the theatrical version shorter means more additional minutes for the EE! Woohoo...(?)Yes and might make for a better flowing film, not bogged down by slow pacing (although I think stuff like Bag End introductions in AUJ were necessary). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KK 3,307 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Again it doesn't really come as a huge surprise when they still have one entire sequel still coming up. As PJ said in one recent interview they can hit the ground running this time and just go off without a huge amount of background exposition to worry about.Yeah but they have a ridiculous amount of content to squeeze in that timeframe. I'm not sure how they're going to do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incanus 5,736 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Again it doesn't really come as a huge surprise when they still have one entire sequel still coming up. As PJ said in one recent interview they can hit the ground running this time and just go off without a huge amount of background exposition to worry about.Yeah but they have a ridiculous amount of content to squeeze in that timeframe. I'm not sure how they're going to do it.In December we will know. Let's not be worryworts over this as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Yeah but they have a ridiculous amount of content to squeeze in that timeframe. I'm not sure how they're going to do it.Yeah. The funny thing is that AUJ is longer, while it would have been more justified for DoS to be longer (based on the events we know will appear in the film) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incanus 5,736 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Yeah but they have a ridiculous amount of content to squeeze in that timeframe. I'm not sure how they're going to do it.Yeah. The funny thing is that AUJ is longer, while it would have been more justified for DoS to be longer (based on the events we know will appear in the film)So AUJ was too long, DoS will be too short. Perhaps TABA will be just the right length. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 It might just be the right lenght for DoS.It just seems weird that AUJ is longer than the second film, since it had less to offer. That is all. But we'll see how PJ uses that screentime... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilbo 3,710 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Some spoilers from the upcoming LEGO sets. http://www.theonering.net/torwp/2013/10/19/80896-see-new-high-res-artwork-for-the-desolation-of-smaug-lego-sets/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilbo 3,710 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Do you mean you think Bolg will be in the actual film? It isn't beyond LEGO to have the wrong minifig in a set. For AUJ they had Yazneg instead of Azog in their out of the frying pan set. Could be the same story here, so as not to spoil anything?That definitely seems to be the same statue alright. I wouldn't worry too much about the Necromancer's look. Minifigs look great when you're familiar with the actual character it's representing not when you're seeing them for the first time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilbo 3,710 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Fair enough. I still can't imagine Azog being at Dol Guldur and Thranduil's palace in the same film but you've certainly put a good case forward. I'll guess we'll have to wait and see. The question is though, why bother with Azog? If he's just going to replace Bolg why didn't they just use Bolg? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixon Hill 4,234 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Damn, I was hoping that would utterly transform the filmDid you honestly believe that 13 additional minutes could dramatically change this film?No, I was being quite sarcastic.Also, that Radagast figure is shooting lightning out of his staff! Neat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faleel 5,459 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 I hope it does though ala Gandalf at Weathertop of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixon Hill 4,234 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Yes, at this point I'm all for wizardy-goodness, as long as it feels like Middle-Earth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilbo 3,710 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 LEGO often add those kind of effects to make it look like that character is doing something. I'm certain you actually see a representation of the Force on the Star Wars boxes. It's just so it doesn't look like the minifigs are doing nothing or levitating in mid air for no reason. BB, I think the change in design is the most likely too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faleel 5,459 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 "New" poster.http://www.kernelscorner.com/2013/10/poster-revolution-ravensburger-unveil.html#.UmMA3lOcwYK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Takis 206 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 LEGO sets often take liberties for the sake of play and character variety, and the licensed sets are sometimes based on early or incomplete concepts. For example, the final Fountain of Youth in POTC: ON STRANGER TIDES looks absolutely nothing like this:So while these new DOS sets provide plenty of fodder for speculation, it's risky to assume that any single piece of "information" is a genuine spoiler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,269 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 But I will take that risk ladies and gentlemen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incanus 5,736 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 But I will take that risk ladies and gentlemen!You are mad! Mad I tell you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SafeUnderHill 205 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incanus 5,736 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 http://www.theonering.net/torwp/2013/10/20/80942-brand-new-poster-artwork-for-the-hobbit-the-desolation-of-smaug/The silhouette on the far right looks at lot like the prosthetic Bolg we've seen so far (the weapon and shoulders). Seems in still in the film, though maybe they kept the same design but did make him CGI, though we did see Bolg on one of the AUJ posters...True! Good eyes SUH! That silhouette group of bad guys seems a bit curious addition to that poster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gkgyver 1,646 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 I'll never get why people care about this Lego crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilbo 3,710 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 Because LEGO is awesome. Once and Wojo 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faleel 5,459 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 Something I didn't realize about Azog:Conan Stevens WAS announced on PJ's blog as being Azog...In June/July 2011...(at which time PJ mused that Orcs never seem to have a normal name like "Dennis", though I suppose "Dennis the Defiler" doesn't have quite the same ring to it). Evidently, the Stevens Bolg design was originally going to be Azog, before they decided to use it for as Bolg instead, so as far as we know, Stevens was recast as Bolg before they starting filming the role, and John Rawls was cast as the smaller Azog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SafeUnderHill 205 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 SafeUnderHill 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faleel 5,459 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 Technically, he is mentioned in the 50's "rewrite". SafeUnderHill 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incanus 5,736 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 Azog is mentioned in the Hobbit, twice at least. He doesn't appear in any larger role though and his full story is told in the LotR appendices. Of course PJ has discarded every bit of info on the big armored orc with an iron helm and made him armorless altogether and with a hook for an arm but that is just cool for modern audiences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SafeUnderHill 205 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Skywalker 1,815 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 Azog works because he looks like an uruk-hai.A Goblinesque orc, as designed first, dont have as much as imposing looks and presence. Their squeaky voices dont hepl either. in LOTR even if they seem to be bosses, they are always disregarded by urukhaiysh orcs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incanus 5,736 Posted October 21, 2013 Share Posted October 21, 2013 Azog works because he looks like an uruk-hai.A Goblinesque orc, as designed first, dont have as much as imposing looks and presence. Their squeaky voices dont hepl either. in LOTR even if they seem to be bosses, they are always disregarded by urukhaiysh orcs.Yes I liked the design in that respect. The albino thing was a bit odd but I guess they had to make him REALLY stand out from the other orcs, not just in that he is freaking giant but also in that he is all white and has no armor to speak of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted October 21, 2013 Share Posted October 21, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now