Marian Schedenig 8,218 Posted November 11, 2007 Share Posted November 11, 2007 Your father was a Woman!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker 5 Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 New Spock.Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marian Schedenig 8,218 Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 Fascinating! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red 75 Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 Or is it interesting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendal_Ozzel 36 Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 Lookin' good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 That much is certain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trent Hoyt 13 Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 I'm excited now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 because of a pic of some guy with pointed ears? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gkgyver 1,646 Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 Hey, he does look good!Too bad I don't give a damn about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trent Hoyt 13 Posted November 15, 2007 Share Posted November 15, 2007 It doesn't take much to get me going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morlock 11 Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 http://www.aintitcool.com/node/34839 Maybe someone's interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaderbait1 1 Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 http://www.aintitcool.com/node/34839 Maybe someone's interested.I don't know how I feel about casting so far. It seems they're going for look-a-likes more than acting-quality... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Karl Urban does not look like Deforest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Crichton 4 Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Here it is, it's blurry and crappy, but also quite possibly the first photograph of the young James T. Kirk. And the 2007 incarnation of an Orion slave girl! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldsmithfan 6 Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 That is the most disgustingly-thin Orion slave girl I've ever seen. Whatever happened to the days of attractive women actually playing attractive characters (Yvonne Craig in "Whom Gods Destroy") rather than the audience having to pretend we're looking at total foxes and ignoring the anorexic reality?P.S: BARF! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 The picture's are to vague to offer any kind of sensible commentary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Crichton 4 Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 Well, it's a red suit... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker 5 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 The EnterpriseNeil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trent B 337 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Hmm interesting, can't wait to see the teaser trailer for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Well looks like Enterprise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Lewis 6 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 USS Enterprise? Is it a "United States Ship", then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker 5 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 USS Enterprise? Is it a "United States Ship", then?Oh brother........Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Lewis 6 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Well, if I were a trekkie I wouldn't be asking, would I? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker 5 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 There are several ways to interpret your post. Are you really surprised that it's the "U.S.S. Enterprise"?Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Lewis 6 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 A bit. Sounded more worldly than I imagined. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker 5 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Do you think it's something new to Star Trek?Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Lewis 6 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 I wasn't talking about Abrams' film, just for the franchise in general. So, no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker 5 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Your post implies that the "U.S.S." prefix is something new to this model. It's been on the starship since the original pilot, and every subsequent incarnation.Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Lewis 6 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Oh that's not what I meant - I looked it up on Wikipedia before I posted. It's just shocked me because it sounded a bit worldly for a show that's about "where no man has gone before", is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delorean90 42 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 They are from Earth... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Lewis 6 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Not that there's anything wrong with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marian Schedenig 8,218 Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 It looks... real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Crichton 4 Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 Nice. Apparently the shot is from the teaser that will be attached to Cloverfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red 75 Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 Impressive, but it's too bad most of it isn't shown. I'm sure the teaser will be good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Docteur Qui 1,544 Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 Wow, I seem to be the first here to have seen either Cloverfield or the new teaser. Ah, Australia finally gets something first.It's just shocked me because it sounded a bit worldly for a show that's about "where no man has gone before", is all.It's a show about humans going where no man has gone before. So they'd be from, you know, Earth. The human element which makes it relative to us, and therefore interesting.The teaser was brilliant. Did the job nicely of just teasing. The friends I went to the cinema with grew up watching TNG and its spinoffs and for the first twenty seconds had no idea what the trailer was for. The reveal of the Enterprise (the picture that Neil posted) accompanied by Courage's fanfare was enough for the theatre to be filled by the excited yelps of seven people (unfortunately others in my generation have no idea what Trek is outside the pop culture nerd point. Hopefully this film will rectify that)Bring it the **** on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker 5 Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 .Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaderbait1 1 Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 It was a decent teaser. It whets the appetite a bit, but it doesn't have anything that really makes it stand out. FOr instance, the Dark Knight teaser had some amazing dialogue that really makes people remember it. This...really just says that Trek is back, and since the last few outings sucked, I'm not sure if it really has the hook that is needed to build hype for it. If that made any sense.That being said, it looks grittier and more realistic. Should be a pretty awesome movie and a new spin on things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldsmithfan 6 Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 That being said, it looks grittier and more realistic. Should be a pretty awesome movie and a new spin on things.Yes, yes. A re-retooling is just what the Star Trek universe needs. NOT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Crichton 4 Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 Not bad at all. I wish I could have watched that not knowing what it was, but as it is that statement of the Courage fanfare with the full shot of the Enterprise gave me chills. I'm still not sold on the prequel concept, but I'm still fairly optimistic.Oh, and I do believe that was a newly recorded Nimoy voiceover. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ollie 1,059 Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 Not bad at all. I wish I could have watched that not knowing what it was, but as it is that statement of the Courage fanfare with the full shot of the Enterprise gave me chills. I'm still not sold on the prequel concept, but I'm still fairly optimistic.Oh, and I do believe that was a newly recorded Nimoy voiceover.Sounded like he was near death. Nice teaser but we'll know in 11 months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ashinyobject 0 Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 In the trailer it looks as if Enterprise is being built ON earth.I thought all the starships were built in spaceI'm curious about how they plan to launch it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ollie 1,059 Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 They turn on the engines and fly it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trent B 337 Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 High def versions of the teaser trailer!http://www.movie-list.com/trailers.php?id=startrek11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trent Hoyt 13 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 thanks for the heads up on that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendal_Ozzel 36 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Man, my computer can't even play the 480p smoothly. :-( I need to upgrade.Oh that's not what I meant - I looked it up on Wikipedia before I posted. It's just shocked me because it sounded a bit worldly for a show that's about "where no man has gone before", is all.That's exactly the point they're trying to emphasize here, which is why they've even revised history a bit to have the Enterprise being built on Earth. These people are from our planet, in our future—a future that is much closer than it was 42 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy4 155 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Wow, I just saw the trailer, I'm really excited! Waiting for someone to get the higher quality one on YouTube, though, my computer doesn't play the one on MovieList. Nimoy and Courage were easily the highlight, can't wait! "Theme from Star Trek" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trent B 337 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 That's exactly the point they're trying to emphasize here, which is why they've even revised history a bit to have the Enterprise being built on Earth. These people are from our planet, in our future—a future that is much closer than it was 42 years ago.Actually the main parts of the Enterprise were actually built on Earth but the assembly of the rest of the parts together as one was built at the San Fransisco ship yards orbiting Earth and the saucer section apparently lifted up from the surface and took off into space since it supposedly has landing gear incase of an planetary emergency landing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy4 155 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 This thread is the epitome of nerddom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rienzi0711 0 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Sooo, I just discovered that Tyler Perry is in this film (Head of Starfleet Academy, it looks like). If this is the case, then we may not want those TOS-style uniforms... fsb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendal_Ozzel 36 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Actually the main parts of the Enterprise were actually built on Earth but the assembly of the rest of the parts together as one was built at the San Fransisco ship yards orbiting Earth and the saucer section apparently lifted up from the surface and took off into space since it supposedly has landing gear incase of an planetary emergency landing.But the trailer shows it all in one piece, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now