Jump to content

LOTR v.s. Potter


indy4

Which trilogy has better scores?  

67 members have voted

  1. 1. Which has the better scores?

    • The Lord of the Rings Trilogy - Composed by Howard Shore
      33
    • The First Three of the Harry Potter Saga (Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, and Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban) - Composed by John Williams
      34


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 251
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Indeed. Which is why I place importance on the context. A new film score, IMO, cannot be fairly judged solely by it's album. I mean, if it works as is, fantastic. But if it sounds an awful lot like something else by this composer....well, it can't hurt to understand what composer was tryign to achieve with the music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Howard Shore has written good music for other films. He scores completely different films than Williams does and they are the kind that don't require boommmtzzzzz.

I cant believe an elder member has said that.

I always get amazed of how many film genres Williams has touched. His versatility is impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess its hard for people to fathom that there are those who love John Williams and think he's the best but can accept the fact that other composers are capable of writing music that is just as good or better at times

May I quote that statement in my singature? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess its hard for people to fathom that there are those who love John Williams and think he's the best but can accept the fact that other composers are capable of writing music that is just as good or better at times

May I quote that statement in my singature? :P

As long as you credit me with it. ;)

Howard Shore has written good music for other films. He scores completely different films than Williams does and they are the kind that don't require boommmtzzzzz.

I cant believe an elder member has said that.

I always get amazed of how many film genres Williams has touched. His versatility is impressive.

While he has scored a large variety of films I don't recall Williams scoring something similar to Silence Of The Lambs, Seven or The Cell to name a few.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always get amazed of how many film genres Williams has touched. His versatility is impressive.

That is why, IMO, JW is the best composer ever. He is able to pull of a good score for any genre given to him. Other composers, such as Elfman, Zimmer, etc., have only one or two sounds, so while they may right work that's as good as JW's (although JW still has more good work), it is normal similiar to their other works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always get amazed of how many film genres Williams has touched. His versatility is impressive.

That is why, IMO, JW is the best composer ever. He is able to pull of a good score for any genre given to him. Other composers, such as Elfman, Zimmer, etc., have only one or two sounds, so while they may right work that's as good as JW's (although JW still has more good work), it is normal similiar to their other works.

fingernails on the black board comes to mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:) Classic Zimmer basher.

He said the same thing about Elfman, and he deserves far more defense! :)

I think Zimmer and Elfman both are diverse (though I only like one of their music). Hell, 99% of talented composers are diverse. I think people imagine that composers can only write one style of music, where really they just get typecast by the industry (and film music fans). Herrmann was typecast, John Williams, Danny, Goldsmith, etc. All these composers have proven they could do any genre, but that's not the way Hollywood, or most fans, think about it --- until they THINK about it. Look at how successfully Christopher Gordon's career was sidelined by typecasting (the composer who should be the next giant of film music). I guess he can only do movies having to do with the ocean!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Elfman is better than Zimmer. Elfman is my second favorite composer, Zimmer my third, and JNH my fourth.

Herrmann was typecast, John Williams, Danny, Goldsmith, etc.

How was JW typecast? Maybe back when he only scored jazz films, but not anymore!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Elfman is better than Zimmer. Elfman is my second favorite composer, Zimmer my third, and JNH my fourth.

You will never learn . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, he isn't! He's scored:

Christmas movies

Westerns

Hero

Sci-fi

Film noir

Jazzy

Comedy

Historical Fiction

Fantasy

Children

Adventure

Horror

Drama

+all the Olympic/NBC/Football stuff

I'd hardly call that being typecasted. He may be more known for his big brassy fanfares, but that certainly isn't the only work he gets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always get amazed of how many film genres Williams has touched. His versatility is impressive.

While he has scored a large variety of films I don't recall Williams scoring something similar to Silence Of The Lambs, Seven or The Cell to name a few.

Your statement works backwards too. I dont recall Shore scoring most of the film genres Williams has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always get amazed of how many film genres Williams has touched. His versatility is impressive.

While he has scored a large variety of films I don't recall Williams scoring something similar to Silence Of The Lambs, Seven or The Cell to name a few.

Your statement works backwards too. I dont recall Shore scoring most of the film genres Williams has.

It's not really down to the composer, sometimes they don't get offered different styles of films so they can show their versatility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted for LOTR because I really and truly think it is better than Harry Potter I am not less of a JW fan because I prefer LOTR over Potter.

I think you are, IMO. Not that I have a problem with that :eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Elfman is better than Zimmer. Elfman is my second favorite composer, Zimmer my third, and JNH my fourth.
Herrmann was typecast, John Williams, Danny, Goldsmith, etc.

How was JW typecast? Maybe back when he only scored jazz films, but not anymore!

He was typecast in Comedies, then Disaster movies. I also think he's been somewhat typecast into space movies and then best-seller adaptations. But less and less so until now he's no longer typecast. But most successful composers have gone through it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being versatile is not defined by having scored movies of very different genres, but by doing it well and uniquely. Williams has done this very well. Most composers haven't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted for LOTR because I really and truly think it is better than Harry Potter I am not less of a JW fan because I prefer LOTR over Potter.

I think you are, IMO. Not that I have a problem with that :eek:

Why? I still like Potter, it's just that I like LOTR more. What is wrong with that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't worry, people just tend to forget that JW is not infallible, and that others are as good as him, just in different ways.

I find it more insulting to JW if one isn't able to have a critical eye for his work. If I was a successful composer, I would rather have fans with which I can talk intelligently than people who drool all over me for even the crappiest little piece of music (NBC Football theme comes to mind).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it more insulting to JW if one isn't able to have a critical eye for his work. If I was a successful composer, I would rather have fans with which I can talk intelligently than people who drool all over me for even the crappiest little piece of music (NBC Football theme comes to mind).

Although I don't agree with that Football comment, I do agree with every thing else. If people love anything JW shoves in their faces, then it starts to get unrealistic. I would say that I love AT LEAST 90% of JW's work. The only score that I really hate is WotW. He is a great composer, I think everybody on this board knows that, he's my personal favorite, but it is not uncommon for another composer to right something as good or better than certain cues by him. IMO, he beats any other composer without a doubt, but there are certain cues that I'd like from a different composer more than certain cues from JW.

This wasn't directed at anybody specifically, just a general statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't worry, people just tend to forget that JW is not infallible, and that others are as good as him, just in different ways.

I find it more insulting to JW if one isn't able to have a critical eye for his work. If I was a successful composer, I would rather have fans with which I can talk intelligently than people who drool all over me for even the crappiest little piece of music (NBC Football theme comes to mind).

I am sorry I am not as intelligent as you, but I don't 'drool over JW' for everything he writes. With owning about 80 JW albums I think I can say I know the essence of JW's work, and yes there is lesser material. HP, however I do not consider lesser material, let alone a 'crappiest little piece'. I stand by my comment that someone who prefers LotR score over HP is not a true JW fan, but a true Howard Shore fan. What else than a magnificent score like PS do you need to beat LotR?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a true fan? The horror, the horror! You, sir, have given grievous insult to the musical tastes of many. Bah! Be gone with your tyrannical dictations of truth among fans. We cannot bear it any longer!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stand by my comment that someone who prefers LotR score over HP is not a true JW fan, but a true Howard Shore fan. What else than a magnificent score like PS do you need to beat LotR?

What?

I must have been asleep when the definition of 'fan' changed to "listens to solely to one composer and refuses to acknowledge the work of colleagues in field". I prefer the LotR scores over Potter, but I barely like anything else Shore has done, so how on earth is that classed 'true Shore fan'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what MSM meant is LotR fanboy in general.

If you still have TheOneRing.net bookmarked,your one of em.

I'd agree LotR maybe beats War of the World or Memoirs of a Geisha,but not the HP series

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you still have TheOneRing.net bookmarked,your one of em.

I don't have JWFan.net bookmarked - what does that make me?

By the way, if this is where the disucssion is going, I say we go all the way and start making people take sides on this matter, organise two armies and see who was right through superior firepower. Then we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stand by my comment that someone who prefers LotR score over HP is not a true JW fan, but a true Howard Shore fan.

And it's as absurd now as it was then.

Apparently bookmarking makes one a fanboy.

The idiocy continues to grow on this board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't stand it when people throw around qualifications for being a "true" JW fan. It's ridiculous. As I've said before, the LotR scores aren't my cup of tea, but there are plenty of scores by other composers I prefer over certain JW scores. This doesn't make me any less of a JW fan than it does those who like the LotR scores better than the Potter ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know - it's as if there's real competition between these composers. Are some guys around here genuinely offended when someone actually likes something not composed by Williams, or are you just trying to cause a ruckus?

I know this is a discussion board, but it's only music, and no one has the right to say to anyone what they should/shouldn't like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, it could work the other way around, too, someone who prefers HP over LotR is not a true Howard Shore fan, but a true JW fan. I couldn't even say something like that and mean it, even if I wanted to.

As if being a Howard Shore fan equals an insult to anyone ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The word fanboy is being thrown around too much. You are only a fanboy if you completely favor one over the other (composers) regardless of whether they are good or not. How does preferring one (large) work from either composers make one a fanboy (or less of a fan) for Shore or Williams? You would have to prefer one's entire body of work to do that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stand by my comment that someone who prefers LotR score over HP is not a true JW fan, but a true Howard Shore fan.

I would love for you to further explain the logic behind that statement.

It's not a very smart statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MSM's comment is actually ridiculous beyond believe.

With the possible exception of Jerry Goldsmith, John Williams is my fav composer, his music has been a constant in my life eversince the early 90's. There are so many scores, so many cues, so many musical moments that have underscored my life.

However, there are other composers out there that I like, Howard Shore is one of them, and in particular his LOTR scores.

Do I like Howard Shore more then John Williams?

Hell no, John Williams has written a lot more brilliant scores then Shore has.

But those 3 scores he did, that I love so much, they are for me as brilliant and magical as the best of John Williams, and Harry Potter is not the best of John Williams.

Close, but not quite.

If MSM cannot grasp that, then he's simply what we would call an "oetlul"!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MSM's comment is actually ridiculous beyond believe.

With the possible exception of Jerry Goldsmith, John Williams is my fav composer, his music has been a constant in my life eversince the early 90's. There are so many scores, so many cues, so many musical moments that have underscored my life.

However, there are other composers out there that I like, Howard Shore is one of them, and in particular his LOTR scores.

Do I like Howard Shore more then John Williams?

Hell no, John Williams has written a lot more brilliant scores then Shore has.

But those 3 scores he did, that I love so much, they are for me as brilliant and magical as the best of John Williams, and Harry Potter is not the best of John Williams.

Close, but not quite.

If MSM cannot grasp that, then he's simply what we would call an "oetlul"!

Well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree with anyone who thinks that by enjoying other scores as much or more than something by JW makes you less of a JW fan. I've been listening to Signs a lot lately, and I like it better than WotW, but hell, I only have three other JNH scores, does that make me a JNH fan? JW is my favorite composer without a dobut, but I'm willing to accept that there are other scores that are as good or better than certain JW scores. I guess you could call me a film score fan first, a JW fan second, but that's debatable. Anybody who isn't willing to accept that there are other great scores not written by JW is a true fanboy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly think that LotR isn't that great,no matter how I feel about Williams or Harry Potter.It's too static .When I listen to it on my ipod it feels like the world around me is a slow motion scene

K.M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly think that LotR isn't that great,no matter how I feel about Williams or Harry Potter.It's too static .When I listen to it on my ipod it feels like the world around me is a slow motion scene

K.M.

In all of RotK's almost 4 hour length, the complete score does have a few dull patches. Particularly, Allegiance to Denethor and the early parts of Anduril. I'm not saying it's bad music, just not really as exciting as the rest of the score.

But in my mind, not only is this completely understandable in a score of this length, but they're compensated by many other moments in the score making me air conduct every second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.