Jump to content

Howard Shore's The Desolation Of Smaug (Hobbit Part 2)


gkgyver

Recommended Posts

Soon, Middle-Earth will sound like Man of Steel.

Not long before the NZO gets replaced by a bunch of synthesizers...for practicality's sake of course!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Budget reasons? I can't imagine it's a practical thing because the live feeds from London to NZ seemed to work pretty good on LotR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. Considering the budget for these films, I don't think the money needed for the score is of any concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of Doug's recent tweets is interesting:

Just a good way to simplify a complicated postproduction schedule while shining light on a fantastic NZ ensemble.

So how much of the Moria music did the NZO do exactly? Just the initial scenes, or Dwarrowdelf, Balin's Tomb, Khazad Dum, Balrog, etc? And is it their recordings we hear on the final soundtrack?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They recorded the whole Moria segment shown at Cannes back in 2001, which I understand was the entire Theatrical version of the sequence. I asked about this back in the day and how was the EE version of the music created and I remember Doug answering that they actually wove the new material (performed by LPO) around NZSO's original performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone has ever been able to hear any difference in what exactly was performed by the LPO or the NZO.

In short, it won't make any difference.

I am sure Shore will mould their performance until he gets the result he is after sound-wise. And didn't he work with them on King Kong? So one could assume they are familiar with him and vice versa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Dwarrowdelf piece is phenomenal, so the NSO are alright in my book.

It probably is good to see that changes are being made based on what went wrong last time. If we get less tracked music and a more consistent score, surely it can only be a good thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone has ever been able to hear any difference in what exactly was performed by the LPO or the NZO.

In short, it won't make any difference.

That is an excellent point, actually.

Karol - really looking forward to this score (on album, that is)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting comments from Doug over at TheOneRing.net:

They're a fine ensemble, and it makes postproduction easier. That's the straight dope.

The problem is, you're looking for a single, explosive explanation. Such a thing does not exist. Different choices were made. That's it. That's really it. Changes were made during the recording sessions--as they always are--and Shore liked certain things for the album while Jackson liked certain things for the film. Think the end of Helm's Deep. The filmmakers liked the Nature theme, Shore liked Gandalf material. The film went one way, the boxed set CDs went another direction.

"Creativity" is another word for "individuality." Because of this, you put two creative people in a room, they're not always going to make identical choices. In this case, there was a format for both sets of choices to be presented, so we heard some discrepancies. If you're digging for a pinpointed moment of drama, you're simply not going to find it. It's just a case of two mature artists coexisting ... with a few differences of opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting comments from Doug over at TheOneRing.net:

They're a fine ensemble, and it makes postproduction easier. That's the straight dope.

The problem is, you're looking for a single, explosive explanation. Such a thing does not exist. Different choices were made. That's it. That's really it. Changes were made during the recording sessions--as they always are--and Shore liked certain things for the album while Jackson liked certain things for the film. Think the end of Helm's Deep. The filmmakers liked the Nature theme, Shore liked Gandalf material. The film went one way, the boxed set CDs went another direction.

"Creativity" is another word for "individuality." Because of this, you put two creative people in a room, they're not always going to make identical choices. In this case, there was a format for both sets of choices to be presented, so we heard some discrepancies. If you're digging for a pinpointed moment of drama, you're simply not going to find it. It's just a case of two mature artists coexisting ... with a few differences of opinion.

Isn't this difference of opinion what made ... well, 2005 ... Nevermind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you serious? You honestly think Shore has to drop instrumental parts because the instruments aren't available? I mean, NZ is a remote place, but ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting comments from Doug over at TheOneRing.net:

They're a fine ensemble, and it makes postproduction easier. That's the straight dope.

The problem is, you're looking for a single, explosive explanation. Such a thing does not exist. Different choices were made. That's it. That's really it. Changes were made during the recording sessions--as they always are--and Shore liked certain things for the album while Jackson liked certain things for the film. Think the end of Helm's Deep. The filmmakers liked the Nature theme, Shore liked Gandalf material. The film went one way, the boxed set CDs went another direction.

"Creativity" is another word for "individuality." Because of this, you put two creative people in a room, they're not always going to make identical choices. In this case, there was a format for both sets of choices to be presented, so we heard some discrepancies. If you're digging for a pinpointed moment of drama, you're simply not going to find it. It's just a case of two mature artists coexisting ... with a few differences of opinion.

Isn't this difference of opinion what made ... well, 2005 ... Nevermind.

Actually, I think they both got it wrong in 2005.

That book on rejected scores says something along the lines that there was too much trust between them, and during the sessions PJ realised that the LotR approach was wrong for Kong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To those who seem a little disappointed, there's more middle earth music coming from the LPO isn't there? Didn't they record more material for AUJ extended edition back around February? I'm not completely sure though.

I don't remember hearing anything about Shore scoring the AUJ: EE yet. I asked Doug over at TheOneRing.net and he was forbidden to say anything about it, even what orchestra was used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting comments from Doug over at TheOneRing.net:

They're a fine ensemble, and it makes postproduction easier. That's the straight dope.

The problem is, you're looking for a single, explosive explanation. Such a thing does not exist. Different choices were made. That's it. That's really it. Changes were made during the recording sessions--as they always are--and Shore liked certain things for the album while Jackson liked certain things for the film. Think the end of Helm's Deep. The filmmakers liked the Nature theme, Shore liked Gandalf material. The film went one way, the boxed set CDs went another direction.

"Creativity" is another word for "individuality." Because of this, you put two creative people in a room, they're not always going to make identical choices. In this case, there was a format for both sets of choices to be presented, so we heard some discrepancies. If you're digging for a pinpointed moment of drama, you're simply not going to find it. It's just a case of two mature artists coexisting ... with a few differences of opinion.

Isn't this difference of opinion what made ... well, 2005 ... Nevermind.

Actually, I think they both got it wrong in 2005.

That book on rejected scores says something along the lines that there was too much trust between them, and during the sessions PJ realised that the LotR approach was wrong for Kong.

Did I miss something? What book? I thought the lid was closed on this affair?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have always been specialist instrumentalists employed that are not part of the LPO. I'm sure they can be flown to NZ as required or recorded elsewhere - this is a global thing now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Record them in London then. PJ was monitoring the TTT sessions remotely from NZ in 2002 and the technology has come on in leaps and bounds since then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Record them in London then. PJ was monitoring the TTT sessions remotely from NZ in 2002 and the technology has come on in leaps and bounds since then.

Yes I don't think the location of the soloists is going to be a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It blows my mind, that someone would even think a monochord etc. is a standard Orchestra instrument....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Record them in London then. PJ was monitoring the TTT sessions remotely from NZ in 2002 and the technology has come on in leaps and bounds since then.

Yes I don't think the location of the soloists is going to be a problem.

Yeah, specialist musicians can travel... can't they?

Karol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whats funny, did not the LPO record AUJ in a different hall than they recorded LOTR in?

it would be ironic, if the Hobbit scores recorded by the NZO, and orchestrated by Conrad Pope etc. sounded more like LOTR in sound than AUJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AUJ didn't have the wetness of LOTR. It was mixed/recorded differently.

But AUJ and LOTR scores were recorded in the same hall, Abbey Road Studios.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought LOTR was recorded in Watford, and then it closed down in 2010?


EDIT: was it only for refurbishment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I think they both got it wrong in 2005.

That book on rejected scores says something along the lines that there was too much trust between them, and during the sessions PJ realised that the LotR approach was wrong for Kong.

Did I miss something? What book? I thought the lid was closed on this affair?

I have a copy of Torn Music, and the entry on King Kong contains no information about Shore's time on the project that wasn't already in the public record. There are two quotes from Peter Jackson, from interviews with Jon Burlingame (for Variety) and Paul Fischer (for Dark Horizons), and a paraphrase of a Howard Shore interview with Daniel Schweiger. I don't think "trust" comes up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought LOTR was recorded in Watford, and then it closed down in 2010?

EDIT: was it only for refurbishment?

Apparently Watford Colosseum, the formed townhall and now a concert venue is up and running at the moment after the 2010-2011 renovations and refurbishments. Perhaps schedule conflict or desire for a different sound made the film makers change the recording venue for the Hobbit: AUJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is all a great ploy to show a journey in sound from An Unexpected Journey to Fellowship Of The Ring! Howard Shore has this planned so meticulously that he even makes the sound evolve. What a genius!

:mrgreen:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He certainly reflects the change in tone of the films in my opinion, which I think wasn't such a bad idea considering the amount of stick they'd get from people saying its too like LOTR. I guess they can never win though.

Of course they could "win." Jackson and his team just needed to trust the source material, find the parts of the story they actually wanted to tell and adapt them with a better idea of where it was all going to end. If they'd done this in the first place and then just trusted Howard Shore to give them the appropriate music, we'd all be winners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course they could "win." Jackson and his team just needed to trust the source material, find the parts of the story they actually wanted to tell and adapt them with a better idea of where it was all going to end. If they'd done this in the first place and then just trusted Howard Shore to give them the appropriate music, we'd all be winners.

white_and_blue_twitter.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I might actually like a one CD of the hobbit soundtrack so it can cover only the highlights and is easier to listen to in one go without having to change cd (maybe that's the standard edition, I got the special edition) as a complete recording would cover getting all the music. It is unfair to say they don't have a good idea of how it's going to end at this point and of course simply following the source material doesn't mean it'll make a good film.

Oh sure, they know how it'll end now, but even during the filming of AUJ, Jackson just couldn't make up his mind about which new plot lines to add, remove, or tinker with some more. You think all this Azog business was planned to be exactly as its turned out? Don't get me wrong, a straight adaptation of anything can make for a terrible film, it's just that Jackson has already proven he can make great Tolkien films.

But to get back on topic, I too wonder how good a single CD release might have been for this score. Some people around here seemed to have trouble getting into the music at first and that might just have something to do with the expanded presentation we got right off the bat. At the same time, I'm really thankful we got as much as we did without having to wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the 2CD presentation is perfect, helps that this score does not have all the repetitive string droning that the LOTR scores have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.