Jump to content

Star Wars Disenchantment


John

Recommended Posts

Mattris, it never happened. It was all a bad dream. There never was a single Star Wars movie. You are now free to go out of your house and enjoy the afternoon sun, take a deep breath and go on with your life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TFA was a point of confluence with the general public and fans to see the first Star Wars film after a decades absence.

 

The point, Mattris, is that you yourself said there is no 'Star Wars Satisfaction Poll' yet you claim Disney's TLJ 'broke the fandom', like you're drawing from some information not available to us mere commoners. Since you can't back up your claims, why should anyone take your fretting with any seriousness?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Arpy said:

Since you can't back up your claims, why should anyone take your fretting with any seriousness?

 

Well, to be fair, the large fall-off between The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi is not something to be taken lightly.

 

I attribute it not to the fan backlash, of course, but to the fact that its not as accessible or entertaining a film as The Force Awakens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, publicist said:

 

What has that got to do with an out-of-control fandom shy of death threats?

I did not address that. I just address your comment that films don't  matter.

 

I think fans have a right to react however they want. However there are consequences that they may incur and they may be harsh. Bad behavior isn't new it is just opportunistic of new technology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, publicist said:

Mattris, it never happened. It was all a bad dream. There never was a single Star Wars movie. You are now free to go out of your house and enjoy the afternoon sun, take a deep breath and go on with your life.

 

 

Even the carcinogen line works!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Stefancos said:

Does he condenm the racist, misogynist comments the "fans" threw at Kelly Mary Tran?

 

Were the comments misogynistic and racist?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Chen G. said:

Were the comments misogynistic and racist?

 

Revoltingly so. 

 

It’s very telling how Mattris seemed to avoid condemning the online harassment towards the TLJ cast in earlier discussions in this thread. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly don't remember anything about this:

 

6 minutes ago, John said:

It’s very telling how Mattris seemed to avoid condemning the online harassment towards the TLJ cast in earlier discussions in this thread. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Lord knows some of this thread's regulars need a reminder or two...or several hundred, for that matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Nick Parker said:

I honestly don't think Matriss is a woman hater or anything like that, from what I've seen.

 

Yes.

 

As much as I don't appreciate his rants, I think its much more troubling that, if you have a dislike (even a strong one) to The Last Jedi, you're more often than not classified as misogenystic, racist, stupid, etc...

 

1 hour ago, Stefancos said:

You haven't read the tweets aimed at her?

 

No.

 

Do you have an example? I read plenty about people like Mattris saying that Kathleen Kennedy is pushing a feminist agenda (which is certainly true of how she runs Lucasfilm), but that isn't the same as being misogenystic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has @Mattris said anything remotely misogenystic? I certainly can't recall that.

 

As for "anti-feminist" - given what "feminism" stands for today - every right-minded human would be anti-feminist. Again, that isn't the same as misogenystic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, whatever your thoughts on the idea of equity (or equal-outcomes), it isn't an ideal of the western world, and therefore is a feminist agenda.

 

Now, Kathleen Kennedy is absolutely advocating equity in Lucasfilm. So, to say that she has a feminist agenda is 100% factual.

 

The questions that remain are:

Is that a good thing? (no)

Does it affect the films themselves? (this far, thankfully, no)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I probably disagree with @Mattris more than I agree with him.

 

But this discussion has become much too one-sided, and so when he makes a good argument - of the film itself or the agenda implemented in its production company - I'll gladly back it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And yet again, if necessary. Its not like there's an awful lot of variation on the other side of the argument, either. Naturally, similar arguments will merit similar rebuttals.

 

Besides, repetition is a form of emphasis. It worked for Cato!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chen G. said:

Does it affect the films themselves? (this far, thankfully, no)

 

@Mattris disagrees with you. He thinks Kennedy instructed the makers of TLJ to inject a feminist agenda into the film.  He's the only one here that thinks that though. 

 

He hasn't really said much about the mysoginist attacks online. He's more disgusted that Johnson called them out for being assholes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Demodex said:

He thinks Kennedy instructed the makers of TLJ to inject a feminist agenda into the film. 

 

I think its clear from watching The Last Jedi that Rian Johnson got to do what he wanted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, again, because there is a feminist agenda in the management of Lucasfilm, its not unreasonable to fear for that same agenda manifesting itself in the movies they produce.

 

I guess we'll have to wait and see IX.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its the sort of thing that can affect the storytelling, if it happens.

 

While its not "feminist" per se, the social commentary of Rose in Canto Bight kind of felt at odds with the rest of the film. Timely themes don't necessarily mesh together with timeless ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Stefancos said:

Solo's failure has other roots than TJL i think. The fact that it cost too much, no one was waiting for it, the month of release.

 

The "fans" didn't turn TFA into a huge hit. You don't pull 2 billion just from its "fans". The regular public ate it up. 

 

Matriss doesn't use logic very well. Perhaps his anger blinds him.

 

The #1 reason for Solo's failure was the backlash from TLJ. Films don't struggle at the box office because they "cost too much".

 

No one was waiting for it? We're talking about a STAR WARS film here! And no one was asking for a 'Death Star plans' film, and it had no trouble making $1B.

 

The month of release? Really? It was released at the start of summer - just like Star Wars films 1977-2005. Are you one of those people who says that Deadpool 2 caused Solo's failure? No film should stop a Star Wars film from being successful. Coming out just 5 months after the previous Star Wars film didn't help Solo, but had TLJ been received well, it probably would have fared much better.

 

The "fans" didn't turn TFA into a huge hit. You don't pull 2 billion just from its "fans". The regular public ate it up.  As Arpy noted, TFA was the "first Star Wars film after a decades absence." If Episode 9 is only as 'good' as TFA, it will bomb.

 

@Stefancos

How am I not using "logic very well"?

You say Episode 9 will "make loads of money". How much do you think it will make?

Do you still see no evidence that TLJ broke the Star Wars fandom?

Can you find any articles from mainstream websites with the majority comments come from pleased Star Wars fans?

Can you present any evidence proving that the Star Wars fandom is largely united?

 

14 hours ago, Arpy said:

TFA was a point of confluence with the general public and fans to see the first Star Wars film after a decades absence.

 

The point, Mattris, is that you yourself said there is no 'Star Wars Satisfaction Poll' yet you claim Disney's TLJ 'broke the fandom', like you're drawing from some information not available to us mere commoners. Since you can't back up your claims, why should anyone take your fretting with any seriousness?

 

SOLO.

 

Lucasfilm admitted a course correction is needed.

 

Regarding the state of Star Wars, the online 'vibe' is indisputable. People feel that Star Wars is broken and will not be supporting it until they perceive major change. If most of the disenchanted fans are not persuaded back, Episode 9 will be a financial disappointment.

 

13 hours ago, Chen G. said:

Well, to be fair, the large fall-off between The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi is not something to be taken lightly.

 

I attribute it not to the fan backlash, of course, but to the fact that its not as accessible or entertaining a film as The Force Awakens.

 

TLJ earned $1.33B from the general public and (most) fans seeing it once. I suspect repeat viewings decreased significantly, hence the $700M drop-off compared to TFA.

 

12 hours ago, Stefancos said:

And people who saw their first SW in with TFA, and saw no reason to return for a second one.

 

TFA being a re-hash of ANH wasn't a main reason people didn't "return for a second one". TLJ had a different director, and the trailers confirmed that it would take the story in a different direction.

 

6 hours ago, John said:

It’s very telling how Mattris seemed to avoid condemning the online harassment towards the TLJ cast in earlier discussions in this thread. 

 

I addressed the "online harassment" and attributed it to a tiny fraction of people... the scum of the Earth who appeared out of the wood-works to jump on the 'Star Wars hate train'. I also said that the online harassment of TLJ cast/crew was blown way out of proportion by the media - so much so that it became the story... when the story should have been that the TLJ cast/crew was insulting fans: accusing them of sexism, racism, misogyny... calling them "assholes" and "manbabies". John Boyega said to the concerned fans, "We don't care." Star Wars novelist Chuck Wendig was the worst, spewing profanity and threats... and dismissed the fans as "not our customers". Thank goodness he was fired... but it took Marvel to do it. Wendig acted surprised that he was fired, saying the Lucasfilm "supported" him in his Tweets.

 

5 hours ago, Chen G. said:

Look, whatever your thoughts on the idea of equity (or equal-outcomes), it isn't an ideal of the western world, and therefore is a feminist agenda.

 

Now, Kathleen Kennedy is absolutely advocating equity in Lucasfilm. So, to say that she has a feminist agenda is 100% factual.

 

The questions that remain are:

Is that a good thing? (no)

Does it affect the films themselves? (this far, thankfully, no)

 

No doubt Kathleen Kennedy asked Rian Johnson for 'strong female characters' in TLJ. She thinks they we written "beautifully". Most fans have a different opinion. Rose and Holdo were perceived as an annoyance to characters we did care about. Their abrasive presence absolutely affected the film in a negative way.

 

Moving forward, I would have no issue if half of the characters in Star Wars were female... if  they were written well and their inclusion logically made sense story-wise.

 

7 hours ago, Stefancos said:

Has Matriss spoken against those who made threats to cast or crew members of The Last Jedi?

 

Does he condenm the racist, misogynist comments the "fans" threw at Kelly Mary Tran?

 

Yes. I also condemn the 'comments' that the film-makers threw at the "fans".

 

6 hours ago, Stefancos said:

Perhaps he thinks those sanctimonious feminist bitches had it coming.

 

You said it, not me.

 

6 hours ago, publicist said:

Misogyny is the least of his problems.

 

This coming from someone who continues to visit and contribute in a Star Wars Disenchantment thread... calling me "unhinged" and my posts a "display of insanity". If "The world at large has more challenging problems than a silly movie series, as do people's lives (one hopes)." then why don't you just leave to improve your life and make the world a better place?

 

3 hours ago, Chen G. said:

I think its clear from watching The Last Jedi that Rian Johnson got to do what he wanted.

 

... at the behest of Kathleen Kennedy, who you admitted has...

 

3 hours ago, Chen G. said:

... a feminist agenda in the management of Lucasfilm, its not unreasonable to fear for that same agenda manifesting itself in the movies they produce.

 

Every new Star Wars movie features strong female protagonists. The characters of Rose and Holdo seemed shoe-horned into TLJ's story, yet they were featured... to the detriment of the film - but not because they were women.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.