Jump to content

No Time To Die (James Bond #25)


Jay

Recommended Posts

It used to be enough for the Bonds to be solidly enjoyable action adventures, but it seems nowadays Barbara Broccoli also wants artistic respectability (hence the hiring of arthouse-ish directors like Marc Foster, Sam Mendes and Danny Boyle ... even though that last one didn't work out). And the likes of the probing of Bond's psyche. 

Possibly a return to more 'journeyman' directors (the modern-day equivalents of Martin Campbell, Roger Spottiswoode and Michael Apted) might see the series return to the new-movie-every-couple-of-years cycle?        

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Sweeping Strings said:

likes of the probing of Bond's psyche

 

And genuinely questioning why Bond even exists, and whether or not he's obsolete.

 

Its also not unheard of for deconstructive films (which Casino Royale and Skyfall very much are) to kill a franchise or genre. Didn't Unforgiven turn the Western genre into a ghost-town for the better part of a decade?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/16/2018 at 12:08 PM, Sweeping Strings said:

It used to be enough for the Bonds to be solidly enjoyable action adventures, but it seems nowadays Barbara Broccoli also wants artistic respectability (hence the hiring of arthouse-ish directors like Marc Foster, Sam Mendes and Danny Boyle ... even though that last one didn't work out). And the likes of the probing of Bond's psyche. 

Possibly a return to more 'journeyman' directors (the modern-day equivalents of Martin Campbell, Roger Spottiswoode and Michael Apted) might see the series return to the new-movie-every-couple-of-years cycle?        

 

Forster was kind of given a short straw with his movie ruined by the writers' strike. While QoS is terrible, I put it mostly down to a nonexistent script.

 

I like Mendes' ones - even if their plots are ridiculous, they make sense at least on a popcorn level.

 

However, I'd prefer Bond to go back to the gadgets and fun, and not exploring Bond's past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else remember when it was cool to heap praise on QoS for being all dark, gritty and edgy and for somehow being really true to Fleming? Then suddenly people all came to their senses after Skyfall came out and everyone was like "Yeah... QoS sucks!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Cherry Pie That'll Kill Ya said:

Anyone else remember when it was cool to heap praise on QoS for being all dark, gritty and edgy and for somehow being really true to Fleming? Then suddenly people all came to their senses after Skyfall came out and everyone was like "Yeah... QoS sucks!"

 

I don't remember it ever being cool to praise QoS. I thought it sucked as soon as I saw it.

 

Nothing wrong with dark/gritty/edge. But the movie does need to have a plot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Richard Penna said:

 

I don't remember it ever being cool to praise QoS. I thought it sucked as soon as I saw it.

 

Nothing wrong with dark/gritty/edge. But the movie does need to have a plot.

This. There's no revisionist history with Quantum Of Solace, people always thought it was terrible and trying to mimic Bourne.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've literally never heard anyone say anything good about QOS at all.  I don't know where Drax is getting this idea from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Richard Penna said:

 

Forster was kind of given a short straw with his movie ruined by the writers' strike. While QoS is terrible, I put it mostly down to a nonexistent script.

 

I like Mendes' ones - even if their plots are ridiculous, they make sense at least on a popcorn level.

 

However, I'd prefer Bond to go back to the gadgets and fun, and not exploring Bond's past.


I thought Skyfall was terrific, and despite some misjudgements (choosing to reintroduce Blofeld to the series with that 'family' angle, for instance) SPECTRE isn't so bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jay said:

I've literally never heard anyone say anything good about QOS at all.  I don't know where Drax is getting this idea from.

 

I've loved it since opening night and praised it over the years. I dug an emotionally unstable drunk heartbroken Bond murdering senselessly. It's not as polished as Casino or Skyfall, but I like its roughness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Cherry Pie That'll Kill Ya said:

 

Not even the 65% good reviews it got?

 

Seems high.  Nobody I know in real life has anything nice to say about it at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jay said:

 

Seems high.  Nobody I know in real life has anything nice to say about it at all

 

One of the guys I saw it with was like "OHMYGOD IT WAS FANTASTIC!"... then he got the shits at me for saying how terrible it was. He was like this with most movies I saw with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We get ... anniversary 'nods' handled much, much better than they were in Die Another Day. A bad guy who is both 'old-school' (island lair) and modern (bisexual cyber-terrorist). Pleasingly modern reintroductions of Q and Moneypenny. A strong sense of proud patriotism (but not the twatty UKIP sort). Some of the finest cinematography of the entire series (some of the shots in China and the Scottish moors take the breath away). A firm 'shutting down' of the stupid idea that 'James Bond' is a passed-along codename (the film makes it very clear that Bond is his FAMILY name). A genuinely moving final scene between Dench's M and Craig's Bond. Some A1 action (of course). The Craig era's best theme song in Adele's 'Skyfall'. 

Oh yeah, it's a good 'un all right.         

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I didn't realise you were talking about Skyfall to begin with.... agreed :)

 

I saw QoS on rental with my brother maybe 6 months after release, and as the credits rolled neither of us had a clue what had happened over the last two hours.

 

I've tried watching the first 20 minutes of the film several times to try to get a handle on any sort of plot. It hasn't worked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sweeping Strings said:

We get ... anniversary 'nods' handled much, much better than they were in Die Another Day. A bad guy who is both 'old-school' (island lair) and modern (bisexual cyber-terrorist). Pleasingly modern reintroductions of Q and Moneypenny. A strong sense of proud patriotism (but not the twatty UKIP sort). Some of the finest cinematography of the entire series (some of the shots in China and the Scottish moors take the breath away). A firm 'shutting down' of the stupid idea that 'James Bond' is a passed-along codename (the film makes it very clear that Bond is his FAMILY name). A genuinely moving final scene between Dench's M and Craig's Bond. Some A1 action (of course). The Craig era's best theme song in Adele's 'Skyfall'. 

Oh yeah, it's a good 'un all right.         

 

It's become my favourite Bond film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bond movies all have the same "plot". Bad guy or woman up to something nefarious, Bond investigates, kills people, uses gadgets, meets an insanely hot female or several and wins. Which ones stray from that formula?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as they're entertaining, fuck. We've got gritty Dalton and buff elf Craig, Connery, comical suave Moore, Brosnan somewhere in between. I just wish he still smoked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Horner's Dynamic Range said:

Bond movies all have the same "plot". Bad guy or woman up to something nefarious, Bond investigates, kills people, uses gadgets, meets an insanely hot female or several and wins. Which ones stray from that formula?


Slight deviations -

OHMSS ends with Blofeld thwarted, but Bond heartbroken rather than triumphant. 

 

Licence To Kill ... all the 'formula' things happen but they're within the framework of Bond seeking revenge for what the bad guy did to his friends. His 'going it alone' insubordination was perhaps only previously matched by him threatening to resign in the aforementioned OHMSS. 

Casino Royale ... Bond may foil Le Chiffre, but doesn't get to kill him (granted, this follows the novel). We've never seen torture hospitalise Bond before. And like OHMSS, the woman he was prepared to give up MI6 for dies in his arms.       

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, crumbs said:

They don't even have a script.

 

I think I read they're going back to the pre-Boyle script.  At the very least, they've brought back the guys who wrote that script. So in any event they're likely ahead of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.