Jump to content

Drew Struzan retiress


QMM

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That's a shame, KotCS was a pretty good poster.

no it wasn't, it was CRAP.

as was most of Drew's recent stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A shame! His latest Indy 4 poster was awsome, great piece of art!

thanks, that was a good laugh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll miss his art. I have the Indy 4 poster and the Hellboy soundtrack. So many movie theatre memories. From Goonies to Hook. Lots of fun waiting for the movie to start staring at his artwork in the lobby or concession room.

Um..did you lose your sense of aesthetics?

Terrible composition...and the overall look is just...amateur.

Uhhh, Let's see you do that. The composition is fine. Balanced yet centered, he avoids the "bullseye" syndrome that would normally result from placing the character in the center through the use of lighter, yet still satured colors in the background. Hints of details beg further inspection, as well as the fact that the character is looking back. The beam of light intersecting through the upper left creates a sense of depth and bridges center focal point and the peripheral details which might be missed without this connector. The lighter area on the lower right brings the eye then down, through the character and then back around to the top. All this plotting makes sure attention is drawn both to the foreground and background, while keeping the familiar character with just enough attention to give passersby the information they need to know what the product is. Pretty good idea if you ask me. The circular gaze is something that is usually sought after by fine artists of the renaissance, though not often by today's "branding" culture where everything is sleek and bare. Paintings like these are a feast for the eyes instead of a throwaway product of pure commercialism. There's a time for branding, and a time for storytelling. It's very difficult to paint and draw at that level. Drew's mixed media techniques have been often imitated but never duplicated. It takes a lot of patience and skill, and he has his own style - which is more than can be said for most realist poster artists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You bloody Americans don't know how to appreciate art or have no idea what you are talking about.

Struzan is one of a kind, were it only for his unique gift for photorealism. There is no-one in the movie poster business or in the world who can paint facial expressions as Struzan can (except for Dru Blair, maybe). It is extremely difficult to accomplish his likelinesses, the naturalness of his compositions and his use of colours.

I would have been proud if my country had modern day artists as talented as Struzan. Shame on you (the criticizers, that is), really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing wrong with the Indy IV poster was Ford's tired half-smile expression. Everyone complains what a grump Ford is but for Indy I think it served that character well. Especially the Don't-f***-with me scowl of the Raiders poster (version B). The one that was on the original OST.

I miss that Indy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You bloody Americans don't know how to appreciate art or have no idea what you are talking about.

Struzan is one of a kind, were it only for his unique gift for photorealism. There is no-one in the movie poster business or in the world who can paint facial expressions as Struzan can (except for Dru Blair, maybe). It is extremely difficult to accomplish his likelinesses, the naturalness of his compositions and his use of colours.

I would have been proud if my country had modern day artists as talented as Struzan. Shame on you (the criticizers, that is), really.

Yeah, he's pretty hit or miss as far as facial accuracy goes.

Poster_Indy_CrystalSkull02.jpg

Ford?

gl0110191451375165.jpg

Emma Watson?

Struzan's a great painter but a mediocre artist. His posters, especially of late, are basically floating heads and collages. Many of his posters are oversaturated with light. Like, is there any need for all these sunbursts?

mpaoscarsposter.jpg

(painted by Struzan's son but designed by Struzan himself)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thankfully the talented fellow has only retired and not passed away, because if this had been his obituary thread...

Most of the comments here are needlessly hateful, once again highlighting the often odious and ugly underbelly the forum breeds and even revels in :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thankfully the talented fellow has only retired and not passed away, because if this had been his obituary thread...

Most of the comments here are needlessly hateful, once again highlighting the often odious and ugly underbelly the forum breeds and even revels in :)

Indeed. Some of the opinions in this thread are just bizarre. I echo someone's earlier comment to the tune of 'just you try doing that'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You bloody Americans don't know how to appreciate art or have no idea what you are talking about.

What does being American have to do with it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Struzan is very uneven. I've never been fond of the Star Wars posters (I dislike the colours), and was it him who did that godawful Final Frontier poster? But there's good stuff, too, and I think the Philosopher's Stone poster is among the best of recent years, he managed to put nearly everything from the book into a witty collage (I particularly like the lightning scar in the frame and the letter at the foundation, so to speak).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the ugliest little red x I've ever seen! :eek2:

I don't get the reaction by some people. Are we supposed to be on our knees weeping just because the guy retired, whether we like his work or not? It's not like he died, if he did the tone of the thread would be quite different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like, is there any need for all these sunbursts?

mpaoscarsposter.jpg

(painted by Struzan's son but designed by Struzan himself)

I think it's representing the flashy tradition that has always come with films. It's one of those classic things you think off--the lights dim, the popcorn pops, and the big lights flash. I see nothing wrong with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.