#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,360 Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 The reuse fees might be less. The paperwork might be more though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crumbs 14,582 Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 If any team can work through all the legal issues though, it's Matessino and LLL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Brundlefly 2,392 Posted October 4, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted October 4, 2018 12 hours ago, Richard Penna said: And yes, there may be an original cue, but if said original cue is inferior or less suitable for the scene than the tracking, then I want the film version.I actually think it's a little fanboyish to think that the composer's original cue is the only way you should ever listen to it. Composers can get it wrong, or the director may have a brilliant idea. Diagon Alley and First Night work waaaayy better than the original cues. No, just no. I don't want the same cue twice in the C&C just because the filmmakers edited it that way. Whose intention it is doesn't matter. What matters is that everything is included. When there are seven cues I want all of them: 1234567 and not: 1264567 one of them twice and another gets dumped. Whether it would have worked in the movie doesn't matter at all. "Drop Out" from Alien would have been inappropriate as hell in the movie - so exclude it from the main program? - No! Chewy, Once, A. A. Ron and 4 others 5 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holko 9,984 Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 If we go by LLL's track record (Jurassic collection), recreated film edits should end up in the bonus section. Except for Chamber where the tracked cues were intended and don't replace anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Incanus 5,784 Posted October 4, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted October 4, 2018 51 minutes ago, Brundlefly said: No, just no. I don't want the same cue twice in the C&C just because the filmmakers edited it that way. Whose intention it is doesn't matter. What matters is that everything is included. When there are seven cues I want all of them: 1234567 and not: 1264567 one of them twice and another gets dumped. Whether it would have worked in the movie doesn't matter at all. "Drop Out" from Alien would have been inappropriate as hell in the movie - so exclude it from the main program? - No! Agreed. In C&C presentations there should be no tracking. I see it as an opportunity to present the music in the way the composer wrote it before it was subjected to the post production editorial process. If the composer's original version was not used but a new composition was written then by all means present the film version in the main programme and relegate the original alternate to the bonus section. But to include tracked material to recreate film edits is most of the time just a waste of space and highly unsatisfactory. 1977, Jay, crumbs and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Penna 3,985 Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 I should clarify that in any case the composer's intention should always be there, but that if the film has a revised version then that version should be in the main program. I'm also trying to highlight that wanting tracked film edits shouldn't be viewed as betraying the composer's original intentions. If it's been done for a creative reason then I may want to hear the result of that. I think the most notable bits of tracking in this score were well judged and work better than what JW wrote. bollemanneke 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crumbs 14,582 Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 ZOMG! www.johnwilliamsharrypotter.com now forwards directly to LLL's website! Ricard 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh500 1,616 Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 27 minutes ago, crumbs said: ZOMG! www.johnwilliamsharrypotter.com now forwards directly to LLL's website! Huh? It doesn't! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crumbs 14,582 Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Shit, they must have taken it down! Holko, Ricard and mstrox 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Incanus 5,784 Posted October 4, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted October 4, 2018 Oh quit yer pranking crumbs! Harry Potter scores are serious business here at JWFan. No room for such misleading levity here! crumbs, bollemanneke and Chewy 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Stu 15,500 Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Yes, I don't think "ZOMG" has been used in a non-ironic manner in years. redishere and crumbs 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incanus 5,784 Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Not everybody reads ironic so fluently here. Especially when such things as complete John Williams scores are concerned. We take our Williams seriously. Very seriously. crumbs and bollemanneke 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Penna 3,985 Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 One does not simply joke about long overdue Potter expansions... bollemanneke and Incanus 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crumbs 14,582 Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Hey, I'm as impatient and tired of waiting as anyone else on here. 😩 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Penna 3,985 Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 LLL might be doing a public service if they just said yep, we're doing it, but it might not be out for BF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brundlefly 2,392 Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 5 years ago, they did all these WB titles. Back then they might have started with HP as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now