• Announcements

    • Jay

      PLEASE DONATE to JWFAN if you can!   08/16/16

      Hello JWFan members,   The team behind JWFan needs your help!   We need annual donations to keep our community running   This is for the domain name, IPBoard license, and server space.   We hope you can help use with a donation of any size.   Use this link or the link on the mainpage. Thank you!   The Administration team
Stefancos

Universal Centennial Logo - 100th Anniversary Logo

101 posts in this topic

I agree. Tyler adds some things that don't need to be there, but he stays true to Jerry's theme.

But honestly, could they not have used the old recording with these new, very cool visuals?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The graphics are spectacular; the OTT music is but a shadow of Jerry's original.

My subwoofer won't even bother trying to register those lame-arsed BUM-BUMs. And I used to fucking love those bits as well.

And the snares... wtf?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. Tyler adds some things that don't need to be there, but he stays true to Jerry's theme.

But honestly, could they not have used the old recording with these new, very cool visuals?

Nah...they need to make EVERYTHING flashy!!! Including the sound.

I obviously like the old recording better, but while this might be a tad bit overdone, I think its still done well enough!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My subwoofer won't even bother trying to register those lame-arsed BUM-BUMs. And I used to fucking love those bits as well.

They are almost the point of the entire piece. And yes they are too soft.

Jerry knew how to land his DUMS!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why did Tyler do away with the high register strings which 'bed' the splendid original? Is that sort of lush warmth no longer trendy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My subwoofer won't even bother trying to register those lame-arsed BUM-BUMs. And I used to fucking love those bits as well.

They are almost the point of the entire piece. And yes they are too soft.

Jerry knew how to land his DUMS!

Yeah, the BOOMs!!! The BOOMs are what made this fanfare so special!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds fine to me.

It sounds ok, but they messed with Jerry's steamlined, but ultra effective orchestration and instrumentation.

This new version has a lot more going on, but it's slightly less effective.

Joel McNeely explains it here

5.1 is great for Jerry's superior original.

To me it says "it's fuckin' movie time!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And after that promising epic fanfare, in true Jerry fashion, movies rarely deliver. ;)

Karol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This Tyler monstrosity sounds odd. It sounds like three different ideas welded to together. If it were a car it'd be a cut'n'shut.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to rumble things up :)

Never heard that one before.

Karol

You know John Williams tweaked it himself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Monstrosity" is a bit strong isn't it? I think he did a fine job with it...would you have liked Djawadi to have done it instead? The fanfare would have been reduced to some fuzzy pop tune, and your BUM BUMs would sure be affected...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds fine to me.

It sounds ok, but they messed with Jerry's steamlined, but ultra effective orchestration and instrumentation.

This new version has a lot more going on, but it's slightly less effective.

Joel McNeely explains it here

5.1 is great for Jerry's superior original.

To me it says "it's fuckin' movie time!"

Yep, Jerry's motto is "less is more".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not throughout his whole career, but certainly from the 90's ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To me it says "it's fuckin' movie time!"

Fuckin' eh! You got that right!

How do you like my Pvt Hudson impression?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha ha ha!

Although, Alex would take issue with that image - the deviant black shadow directly above Paxton's head completely ruins the composition and framing of the shot. The film is an unmitigated failure as a result.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like the new graphics or the new recording of the music. There was nothing wrong with the existing one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the new version. But the snare drums are too loud at the end, and a little too sloppy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya, the snare drums was the big problem with this new version. Otherwise, the tribute is decent enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoa, somehow never noticed the Williams / ET logo. Great, now I have to stick it in my ET edit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dislike it, although the original is so iconic and has been heard so many times, I don't envy Tyler's job. It sounds a little too over the top for my taste, with the snare drums and choir a step too far. Rather than beefing up the existing logo, perhaps they should have merged an older logo's music into the new one to create a sense of history.

As for the graphics, I got goosebumps when I saw the lights turning on - always a good sign!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I liked it until the chords he's added over the first bar - it takes away from the simplicity and strength of Goldsmith's melody, and also means a rather sudden change of tone when the 'b' part comes in.

Choir is okay I guess - nothing against that really.

The graphics are really neat, but he's made the music just a little too layered for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a dissapointing new recording. All the oomph and percussive power are lost. Lame ass way to degrade a great fanfare.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rearranged theme is okay -- the original 1997 fanfare is just better, simpler and more powerful. I don't understand the fanfare Universal made about hiring the people at Weta Digital to design a new opening for the 100th anniversary... it's not that impressive but it's clean and well-designed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's what I got from the new version:

1. A rising bass line, doubled with choir during the repeat of the A theme.

2. Snare drum in the end.

3. Transposed down a key.

4. Removed cymbal crash when B theme begins.

5. Low brass removed from the "DUM DUMs", aka bass/snare drum hits.

6. Choir during B theme?

Feel free to add more to this list.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still like the Horner version the best. I do like the graphics, as I always hated the modern Universal logo. The new arrangement is alright, I just would have done without the military like drums at the end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still like the Horner version the best. I do like the graphics, as I always hated the modern Universal logo. The new arrangement is alright, I just would have done without the military like drums at the end.

Huh? Horner?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If this were something new that someone had just come up with, I'd be rather impressed. But it's a downgrade from the spectacular Goldsmith original, which very well be my favorite logo music of all time. (The Fox fanfare gives it a run for its money, for obvious sentimental reasons.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now