Indiana Jones: The Soundtracks Collection (OFFICIAL thread)

[Mattris 439]

Compared to The Last Crusade OST, the music in the film itself sounds much clearer. The remastered Last Crusade should sound noticeably better than the OST.

How could the interview be worth an entire CD? The JW interview should be 10-20 minutes, which leaves another hour open for more unreleased music.

Why doesn't Concord release the track listing? Could the set's cue inclusions still be undetermined? Or are they just building the suspense...

[MrScratch 296]

How could the interview be worth an entire CD. The JW interview should be 10-20 minutes, which leave another hour open for more unreleased music.

That is my hope, that the bonus disc will contain the interview as well as other goodies. Source music, alternates, etc. I'm not counting on it, but until we get a track list it remains a possibility.

[Lurker 5]

Unless it's a bonus 3" CD.

Neil - who is just speculating and has no insider knowledge about this set

[Luke Skywalker 2,385]

it seems the release is taking shape.

And more bickering

[Henry B 51]

Unless it's a bonus 3" CD.

Neil - who is just speculating and has no insider knowledge about this set

What's that? You're saying ToD and LC will be 3" CDs with only twenty minutes of music on them? By God! Somebody get AICN on the phone!

[#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 12,388]

Well thanks to Neil we know there are 3 bonus CD's, so a total of 7 discs. More then enough for the complete scores

[bruckhorn 134]

It is possible that the reason for the track listings not being released yet is that the track names may require final approval from Lucasfilm. It could very well be hung up by somebody trying to decide if "Chaos Underground" is a better title than "Underground Chaos".

They probably have until the neighborhood of October 20 before everything has to be locked down. I'm not expecting any news from Concord until then. Hoping for, certainly, but not expecting.

And, another thing I'm waiting for is word on why I would want to buy the boxed set versus the individual titles. One on-line retailer (SAE, I think) has the new Raiders at $9. If TOD and LC are both sold for $19 each (which considering the cost of Raiders and Skull are currently getting, seems a bit high), then I can get the remastered trilogy for $47, roughly the same cost of the box set but without a second copy of Skull.

[davros72 1]

And, another thing I'm waiting for is word on why I would want to buy the boxed set versus the individual titles. One on-line retailer (SAE, I think) has the new Raiders at $9. If TOD and LC are both sold for $19 each (which considering the cost of Raiders and Skull are currently getting, seems a bit high), then I can get the remastered trilogy for $47, roughly the same cost of the box set but without a second copy of Skull.

Oooh, but then you'd be missing the "bonus interview CD with composer John Williams on the making of this historic music" as well as the "handsome embossed slip case" and the "full color booklet"!

[King Mark 3,975]

yeah,i'll spare a few extra bucks for the box .Besides it's already reduced price by 12$

[artyjeffrey 20]

Am I the only one who would rather NOT have an interview disc? I love JW's music, but he's not the most engaging personality, what with diplomacy and all.

[Ollie 1,375]

It really doesn't matter to me. If Williams offers something interesting yes, but if it's his typical response, no.

[davros72 1]

Am I the only one who would rather NOT have an interview disc? I love JW's music, but he's not the most engaging personality, what with diplomacy and all.

If it costs me nothing extra to have it, and it doesn't prevent us from getting further unreleased cues... I don't mind having it. I'll probably listen to it once.

[King Mark 3,975]

the rest of the disk is Williams humming the unreleased music

[Ollie 1,375]

It will probably collect dust. I have yet to even listen to the bonus disc that came with the Star Trek TMP 20th Anniversary set. And that was what, 10 years ago?

[BurgaFlippinMan 7]

In case of Temple, they can drop Anything Goes! Instead they should include all the exciting John Williams action music!

And drop the music to the best opening titles of the series?

Generally, with any re-release omitting previously released music will result in complaints.

Indeed.

Why doesn't Concord release the track listing? Could the set's cue inclusions still be undetermined? Or are they just building the suspense...

Maybe they are just about to go bankrupt

[Luke Skywalker 2,385]

Generally, with any re-release omitting previously released music will result in complaints.

Indeed.

Really, in this case, i wouldnt mind them omiting all the released music and then release these discs as Volume 2, containing all of the remaining music.

As long as the sound quality matched the OST's.

I dont want half of it sounding good and the other half bad...

[FattyMcButterpants 1]

the rest of the disk is Williams humming the unreleased music

Now there would be some genuine entertainment!

So, there will be expanded tracks as well as music never heard before ...? I guess the "never heard before" is referring to "never heard before on CD"; I don't imagine they would include alternates with only four discs available.

[King Mark 3,975]

at this time but there are extended versions as well as ,on the 5th disk ,

never before released tracks as well.

Regards,

Brandi

CMG Customer Service

Maybe that's what she means

[ciarlese 282]

at this time but there are extended versions as well as ,on the 5th disk ,

never before released tracks as well.

Regards,

Brandi

CMG Customer Service

Maybe that's what she means

I don't think so.

Raiders comes with never before released tracks.

[Koray Savas 2,260]

Hoota! Hoota! Hoota bazora!

[BurgaFlippinMan 7]

Generally, with any re-release omitting previously released music will result in complaints.

Indeed.

Really, in this case, i wouldnt mind them omiting all the released music and then release these discs as Volume 2, containing all of the remaining music.

A product like that only targets a tiny section of the already small soundtrack buyers market

[indy4 160]

If you have any additional questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us at your convenience.

Well, what are we waiting for?!

[Ollie 1,375]

Don't encourage them.

[Koray Savas 2,260]

Oh, I'm gonna encourage.

[indy4 160]

Hold on lady, we going for a ride!

[Kendal_Ozzel 36]

My guess is that the lack of track listings means they are still working on the albums. Perhaps the idea of expanding them wasn't the original re-release plan. It could have been a later decision as a result of the overwhelming feedback they received.

Anyway, just more wild speculation—because clearly this thread needs more.

[King Mark 3,975]

yeah,well i just hope they're reading this thread,so they get more ideas on how to properly release this .If they want to stop new bootlegs especially LC just release all the music

[indy4 160]

I wouldn't mind waiting a couple extra months for the box set if it meant more music, but I doubt that'll happen.

[artyjeffrey 20]

It will probably collect dust. I have yet to even listen to the bonus disc that came with the Star Trek TMP 20th Anniversary set. And that was what, 10 years ago?

You really should check it out sometime, fun stuff.

[Marian Schedenig 11,695]

My guess is that the lack of track listings means they are still working on the albums. Perhaps the idea of expanding them wasn't the original re-release plan. It could have been a later decision as a result of the overwhelming feedback they received.

In that case, you should expect the release date to be delayed considerably, since they'd have to produce the CDs first.

I rather think they either haven't finalised the track titles yet (though I guess that might still mean a problem in getting the packaging ready in time) or they just haven't been cleared for a press release yet.

[Neimoidian 15]

Banning Back Home should be omitted before all other cues.

No! I'd spare We don't want to grow up though.

Chris, who will be happy with any release of IJ music he gets, because he has not a single original cd of it so far.

[Marian Schedenig 11,695]

Banning Back Home should be omitted before all other cues.

No! I'd spare We don't want to grow up though.

I like both. Though I probably like BBH more.

[Quintus 6,499]

Cheesiest JW track ever. A guilty pleasure though.

Hmm on second thoughts, scratch that last bit.

[Red 75]

Banning Back Home should be omitted before all other cues.

No! I'd spare We don't want to grow up though.

I'd say the piano intro alone is enough to keep that track.

[Mr. Breathmask 624]

Cut the thing in half then. Keep the piano intro, but get rid of the sappy singing brats.

[Quintus 6,499]

But I like the Yup! right at the end...

[Red 75]

Cut the thing in half then. Keep the piano intro, but get rid of the sappy singing brats.

Fair enough. There is better (and more important) material that could take its' place.

[Marian Schedenig 11,695]

Cheesiest JW track ever.

No, that's When You're Alone.

[King Mark 3,975]

yeah,but it;s much better .and a guilty pleasure

[Desplat13 1]

But I like the Yup! right at the end...

I always thought that was a Yuck!

[Quintus 6,499]

Ah, you're probably right.

[-Jones- 0]

What's this?

Raiders of the Lost Ark

Temple of Doom

Last Crusade

I see that these have been released. Hmm. We're only waiting for a box? :cool: BTW, my 1st post, hello everyone!

[Lurker 5]

Bootlegs.

From the Screen Archives page: "ORIGINAL ALBUM ARTWORK FAITHFULLY REPRODUCED"

You can see there what the cover for Raiders will look like.

Neil

[Hlao-roo 390]

Bootlegs.

*GASP* Bootlegged music? Who would dare do such a thing?

[King Mark 3,975]

sad we might still have to hang on to them

[tjguitar 0]

Was that guy for real? LOL. Whoever it was should 'fess up. :cool:

Seriosuly though, how could anyone think that was legit? the art looked so unprofessional....

[indy4 160]

(About the Raiders cover art) You'd think that they'd at least use a picture of Ford in his costume.

[Kendal_Ozzel 36]

Was that guy for real? LOL. Whoever it was should 'fess up. :cool:

Seriosuly though, how could anyone think that was legit? the art looked so unprofessional....

I saw that TOD one on Amazon once (as user-submitted cover art). I reported it, though, and I think they took it down.

[Koray Savas 2,260]

All of those are "legit" bootlegs.

[Ollie 1,375]

No.