Jay 37,374 Posted October 7, 2014 Share Posted October 7, 2014 Gone GirlSaw this Saturday at a matinee showing in my town, and was reminded why I hardly ever go to the theater any more. People on my left taking cell phone calls, chewing loudly and burping, people behind me talking to the on-screen characters, etc. Bah!Anyways, for about 95% of the runtime I loved this film. It has the same look Fincher has used for his recent work - Social Network, Dragon Tattoo, and House of Cards. It has fine acting from Ben Affleck, Rosamund Pike, Neil Patrick Harris, Carrie Coon, and even surprisingly Tyler Perry! I enjoy the twists as turns the story took throughout as well. The problem for me was the ending. I thought the final scene(s) (everything from the tv interview onward) where atrociously bad and made me dislike the film. Shame too, because everything before it was so good! ZackR 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,374 Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 MaleficentYou know, this was surprisingly good! Ok, it's nothing spectacular, game-changing, or influential, but almost right away from the first scene I was engaged in the story and setting and stayed that way to the end. I was expecting nothing at all here, but found myself wanting to see where the story went. There's almost no one recognizable in the cast outside of Jolie, but they all do an admirable job, and the special effects and overall look of the film were good. FANTASTIC score by James Newton Howard, too! I was hoping the film would shed light on what the various themes on the OST represent, but it didn't really; I guess one is just a "Maleficent is being nice" theme and one is a "Maleficent is being evil" theme Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 The score has a strong, Horner like atmosphere, but the themes aren't that interesting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wojo 2,453 Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 MaleficentThere's almost no one recognizable in the cast outside of Jolie, but they all do an admirable job, and the special effects and overall look of the film were good.You may have recognized King Stefan as Sharlto Copley, an actor from other films like Europa Report, District 9, and The A-Team. And Princess Aurora looks strangely similar to Dakota Fanning...because it's her little sister. And of course, Dolores Umbridge played one of the fairies. That about covers the almosts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,374 Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 Yea, I recognized Umbridge, that was it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wojo 2,453 Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 I've been a fan of Copley getting bigger roles in American movies since District 9 so I made it a point to know he was in it before seeing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koray Savas 2,251 Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 Jay couldn't recognize Elle Fanning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,374 Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 Meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbellamy 6,293 Posted October 10, 2014 Share Posted October 10, 2014 I thought the final scene(s) (everything from the tv interview onward) where atrociously bad and made me dislike the film. Shame too, because everything before it was so good!Care to elaborate on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,374 Posted October 13, 2014 Share Posted October 13, 2014 Sure. I liked the twist halfway through the movie, that Amy was alive the whole time and faked her death to set up her husband for her murder, because he cheated on her among other reasons. And I liked how she got robbed and had to adjust her plans and trick NPH into taking her in, etc. And her murdering him was fine too. But when she shows up back on their driveway, covered in blood (no one noticed a bloody girl driving a car for tens of hours?) the movie started to lose me. Then at least the police had the decency to ask some of the right questions, but then when her and Affleck are back in their house again I was like WTF is going on. I thought FOR SURE that when the people show up at their house to interview them and Affleck goes upstairs and Amy confesses everything - I thought for SURE that he was mic'd up for the interview, and people downstairs where listening to the whole thing, and Amy was finally going to jail. That would have been a much better ending!Instead, Affleck takes herback and wants to have a baby with her because... reasons? Because marriage is hard? If the movie had built up that they are both fucked up people, it would make sense. But the movie only really built up that Amy was fucked up. Affleck comes off as a nice guy that cheated on his wife and was too much of a pussy to divorce her, but not a crazy guy who would get back with her after everything she did. Movie lost all credibility with that stupid ending!Hope that makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbellamy 6,293 Posted October 13, 2014 Share Posted October 13, 2014 Sure. I liked the twist halfway through the movie, that Amy was alive the whole time and faked her death to set up her husband for her murder, because he cheated on her among other reasons. And I liked how she got robbed and had to adjust her plans and trick NPH into taking her in, etc. And her murdering him was fine too. But when she shows up back on their driveway, covered in blood (no one noticed a bloody girl driving a car for tens of hours?) the movie started to lose me. Then at least the police had the decency to ask some of the right questions, but then when her and Affleck are back in their house again I was like WTF is going on. I thought FOR SURE that when the people show up at their house to interview them and Affleck goes upstairs and Amy confesses everything - I thought for SURE that he was mic'd up for the interview, and people downstairs where listening to the whole thing, and Amy was finally going to jail. That would have been a much better ending!Instead, Affleck takes herback and wants to have a baby with her because... reasons? Because marriage is hard? If the movie had built up that they are both fucked up people, it would make sense. But the movie only really built up that Amy was fucked up. Affleck comes off as a nice guy that cheated on his wife and was too much of a pussy to divorce her, but not a crazy guy who would get back with her after everything she did. Movie lost all credibility with that stupid ending!Hope that makes sense.Hmm that's not what I got out of it. The main feeling I had at the end was that he was trapped. He's terrified of her. He has no evidence so he can't out her. He can't run for it, because he'll be ostracized and you can't really put it past her to make his life a living hell, anyway. Of course he can't kill her. At the point the film ends, they had a pretty great surface life going for them. Nationwide fame and adulation, deals for documentaries and movies. Their inner life, of course, is a giant shit show and will be until they snap, and I found that to be a suitably twisted note to leave it on. I found it pretty unbelievable that the police wouldn't press her harder during her interrogation or search further after she returned, but there's also the sense in the story that perhaps the law and especially the general public don't want to pull back the curtain. Unless the case was airtight, which it wouldn't be.I agree that the treatment of Affleck's character is a major problem (very good performance, though), but I also don't think he comes off as such a nice guy by the end. He's pretty manipulative in his own right and reveals himself to be quite the asshole as the film progresses, though certainly not anything close to Amy's sociopathic levels. Especially after that kitchen scene with his sister, I was left wondering how much he REALLY wants to risk everything he has right now, even if it means living in fear of Amy. In the end, I took it for what it was: a pulp fiction story intended to provoke and seriously stretching plausibility in exchange for an entertaining and bizarre take on fame and marriage. Especially after the big reveal in the middle (most likely the scene of the year), Fincher really seemed to revel in the sheer absurdity of it all. It's the most fun I've ever had watching one of his movies and certainly the funniest that he's ever made. It's true that I couldn't believe most of what was happening, but I admit I was able to derive quite a bit of nasty fun out of this deliciously monstrous, absolute raving lunatic of a femme fatale giving this guy this grand comeuppance simply for being kind of a dill hole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,374 Posted October 13, 2014 Share Posted October 13, 2014 Oh, I dunno about that I don't buy that he's terrified of her whatsoever - I think he could have easily left her. All he had to do was go to the police, tell them everything he suspects, encourage them to look harder at the evidence in the lakehouse (she was fairly sloppy with all that), etc. She can stay in the house, he can just go live with his sister. He can tell the police he fears for his life and they can post a guard, whatever. The ending wasn't logical, it was done to have the ending the book author wanted, and I was disappointed that for the film they didn't either 1> change the details along the way to make the ending more plausible or 2> Keep everything the same but have a more plausible and realistic ending. I just thought it was a silly and messy ending to an otherwise fantastic film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted October 13, 2014 Share Posted October 13, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixon Hill 4,234 Posted October 13, 2014 Share Posted October 13, 2014 Sure. I liked the twist halfway through the movie, that Amy was alive the whole time and faked her death to set up her husband for her murder, because he cheated on her among other reasons. And I liked how she got robbed and had to adjust her plans and trick NPH into taking her in, etc. And her murdering him was fine too. But when she shows up back on their driveway, covered in blood (no one noticed a bloody girl driving a car for tens of hours?) the movie started to lose me. Then at least the police had the decency to ask some of the right questions, but then when her and Affleck are back in their house again I was like WTF is going on. I thought FOR SURE that when the people show up at their house to interview them and Affleck goes upstairs and Amy confesses everything - I thought for SURE that he was mic'd up for the interview, and people downstairs where listening to the whole thing, and Amy was finally going to jail. That would have been a much better ending!Instead, Affleck takes herback and wants to have a baby with her because... reasons? Because marriage is hard? If the movie had built up that they are both fucked up people, it would make sense. But the movie only really built up that Amy was fucked up. Affleck comes off as a nice guy that cheated on his wife and was too much of a pussy to divorce her, but not a crazy guy who would get back with her after everything she did. Movie lost all credibility with that stupid ending!Hope that makes sense.Hmm that's not what I got out of it. The main feeling I had at the end was that he was trapped. He's terrified of her. He has no evidence so he can't out her. He can't run for it, because he'll be ostracized and you can't really put it past her to make his life a living hell, anyway. Of course he can't kill her. At the point the film ends, they had a pretty great surface life going for them. Nationwide fame and adulation, deals for documentaries and movies. Their inner life, of course, is a giant shit show and will be until they snap, and I found that to be a suitably twisted note to leave it on. I found it pretty unbelievable that the police wouldn't press her harder during her interrogation or search further after she returned, but there's also the sense in the story that perhaps the law and especially the general public don't want to pull back the curtain. Unless the case was airtight, which it wouldn't be.I agree that the treatment of Affleck's character is a major problem (very good performance, though), but I also don't think he comes off as such a nice guy by the end. He's pretty manipulative in his own right and reveals himself to be quite the asshole as the film progresses, though certainly not anything close to Amy's sociopathic levels. Especially after that kitchen scene with his sister, I was left wondering how much he REALLY wants to risk everything he has right now, even if it means living in fear of Amy. In the end, I took it for what it was: a pulp fiction story intended to provoke and seriously stretching plausibility in exchange for an entertaining and bizarre take on fame and marriage. Especially after the big reveal in the middle (most likely the scene of the year), Fincher really seemed to revel in the sheer absurdity of it all. It's the most fun I've ever had watching one of his movies and certainly the funniest that he's ever made. It's true that I couldn't believe most of what was happening, but I admit I was able to derive quite a bit of nasty fun out of this deliciously monstrous, absolute raving lunatic of a femme fatale giving this guy this grand comeuppance simply for being kind of a dill hole.Right on, this is pretty much how I felt after walking out of it. It was great fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt C 455 Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 The JudgeIt's well-intentioned, but this is the sort of 'uplifting' film you'd catch on Hallmark -- but R-rated and with an A-list actor heading it. There's some warmth and genuine tension between Robert Downey Jr. and Robert Duvall, but RDJ doesn't really 'disappear' or make the character his own. Like a less flippant Tony Stark. And then at the end, there's a maddening cutaway ... the main character is about to break into tears but the scene cuts to a wide shot -- which undermines an emotional catharsis. You'd figure RDJ and his wife's passion project would be more risky... but it infuriatingly sticks to the "you're not a real man if you cry" rule.Stick to a rental or Netflix for this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,374 Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 That was a problem in "Chef" too, he basically just played a slight variation of Tony Stark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koray Savas 2,251 Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 That's just him. He's a personality actor. I remember him being like that all the way back in Ally McBeal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 Pretty much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muad'Dib 1,802 Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 We'll always have Chaplin, at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightscape94 965 Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 I remember him being good in Restoration. Not a fan of Chaplin, despite an unhealthy obsession with Moira Kelly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muad'Dib 1,802 Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 Why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
publicist 4,643 Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 The Barry score really sells this movie in key places. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightscape94 965 Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 I haven't seen the movie in like 15 years or so, but I remember thinking it was rather uninteresting. Perhaps it was the script, pacing or structure. Maybe I have to revisit it. It's not all that fresh in the 'ol noggin anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
publicist 4,643 Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 It is one of those polished ready-made-for Oscar-night showpieces by Dickie Attenborough. Not bad but also a disservice to Chaplin's art since it's one of these meticulous biopics that are more concerned with soulful glances towards a long lost love instead of exploring CC's comic genus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightscape94 965 Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 It is one of those polished ready-made-for Oscar-night showpieces....That's it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muad'Dib 1,802 Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 It's Oscar bait for sure, but personallly I find it an extremly compelling film. Can't get enough of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
publicist 4,643 Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 It's Barry! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A24 4,346 Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 To me, Downey Jr. is that '80s actor from the John Hughes factory who has managed to be successful today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 Kelly LeBrock was my second crush ever! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 Who was the first? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A24 4,346 Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 Quintus was probably in love with Brooke Shields. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unlucky Bastard 7,782 Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 She farted. Koray Savas 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naïve Old Fart 9,554 Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 We'll always have Chaplin, at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt C 455 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 That's just him. He's a personality actor. I remember him being like that all the way back in Ally McBeal.He is a good Sherlock though, I don't see much Tony Stark there. But everything else... yeah, it's more personality and less chameleon. It's a similar problem with Denzel Washington -- the man can play three modes: smooth badass, conflicted antihero, or full-on bad guy.They need to branch out into riskier fare in between the big paycheck films. And not some generic Oscar bait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koray Savas 2,251 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Gone GirlDarkly comic and disturbing. Not sure if I like it or not, I'm indifferent at the moment. I think the whole thing just puts me off. It's too serious to be like Fight Club and too ridiculous to be like The Game. Direction and cinematography are top notch per usual, but the convoluted plot is the film's biggest detriment. In the end it just doesn't make sense. I might read the book down the road to gain more insight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,374 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 I didn't think the plot was convoluted or didn't make sense - everything was easy to follow and not that complicated. I just didn't like how the plot ended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koray Savas 2,251 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 There were so many loose ends in the fabric of it all that there was no possible way for it to end as it did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
publicist 4,643 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Gone Girland too ridiculous to be like The Game A bold statement. THE GAME is so ridiculous it puts Bobby Ewing's dream revelation to shame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Who was the first?Kylie Minogue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A24 4,346 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 So you watched Neighbours, huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Nah, it was her I Should Be So Lucky video. She looked heavenly in it, to a 10 year old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koray Savas 2,251 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Gone Girland too ridiculous to be like The Game A bold statement. THE GAME is so ridiculous it puts Bobby Ewing's dream revelation to shame.The Game is ridiculous, but I believe it every step of the way. It's a fantastic roller coaster ride with a great denouement. With Gone Girl's central unsolved crime, the lack of investigative talent just takes you out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,374 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Everything after a certain hospital scene near the end begins, characters all just lose their minds for no real reason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koray Savas 2,251 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Couldn't Affleck just have gotten that ex boyfriend to testify that she faked her rape? She did the exact same thing with NPH. Besides, wasn't the whole mansion supposed to be under surveillance? Wouldn't there have been another angle somewhere of her setting it all up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,374 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Exactly, among many other points Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koray Savas 2,251 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Ah well, it's the first Fincher film that I've been mildly disappointed with. The score was fitting, though quite tame in comparison to Reznor/Ross' previous efforts. Howard Shore would have done wonders with this. C'mon Fincher! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crocodile 8,020 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 I might go and see it this week.Karol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A24 4,346 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 I've been disappointed several times with Fincher (Alien3, The Game, The Girl With Dragon Tattoo, ...) so maybe I should check this one out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crocodile 8,020 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 He's a bit of a roulette, isn't he?But I like the danger!Karol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
publicist 4,643 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 He seems to consider potboiler material as his challenge. Only that could possibly explain the second adaptation of another airport novel in a row. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now