Jump to content

James Horner's THE MASK OF ZORRO (1998) - 2023 2-CD Expanded Edition from La La Land Records, produced by Neil S. Bulk


Jay

Recommended Posts

It would be interesting to know what makes it particularly tricky. Rules change for mechanical reuse fees that year, altering the AFM fees for these recordings, or is it internal politics of some kind?

 

Either way, I hold out hope for expansions, even if unlikely for whatever reason.

 

I've seen too many film score release miracles not to.

To my thinking on AFM fees etc., they are doing what any union should do, and that is to protect the rights and interests of it's members.

 

Unfortunately, it sucks when it diminishes the viability for releasing more music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, JTW said:

And judging from Intrada's 2024 lineup they will be next year as well.

 

Volunteers: CONFIRMED! ;) (<-- Obligatory wink to show: I have no knowledge that Volunteers is coming next year.) (Would be nice though.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listened to it this afternoon.

So great to finally hear these new tracks !

 

Now, don't get me wrong, I think this is a great release and aside from the "W" missing on the first page of my booklet I love it. But, yeah there had to be a "but" ... the transition from the amazing stellar sounding of the "Hook Ultimate Edition" to this score made me realize the sound quality is not as detailed and rich as the aforementioned one. I don't know if it's due to the original sessions (recording/setting artistic choice) ... or even a creative choice during the remastering process but I find the sound to be a little bit "muffled". It sounds very good, but when you compare it to the 2023 Hook Ultimate Edition, or even to another Horner, 2019 "Project X" mastered by MM for LLL there's a bit difference. It doesn't breathe as much.

 

I don't know about you, but I tend to find old analogic remastered recordings to sound way better than many "modern" digital recordings.

20231220_012024.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weird, Mask had some London Symphony Orchestra musicians performing on it. There's an interview on the James Horner Film Music Website that I was reading today that mentioned that Horner ordered some LSO people to fly all the way to Los Angeles to perform alongside American musicians on the revised version of Diego's Goodbye :lol:

 

As far as I know, Legend was entirely on the USA, but I may be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You’re not wrong. And I don’t think Mask is performed or recorded poorly at all. I just think Legend has a bit more spark to it. It wouldn’t surprise me if LA players just felt a bit more natural with a Hispanic idiom than London players.

 

Yavar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone have more thoughts on this great release?

I admittedly haven't listened to it as much as I should have since I fell completely in love with the Sneakers expansion, but this is great too.  It almost would have been better if these two giant releases had been months apart instead of on the same day,  but I'm sure that was out of everyone's control

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how much better the full score flows compared to the album. I always found the OST a little overbearing after a while, but having everything complete and in its proper place really helps. I'm loving this expansion, but I do have a similar situation to you, @Jay. Only here it's Hook that's currently hogging all the playtime. What a ride that one is! I'm sure I'll get back around to this one soon though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having never seen the movie or heard the score, I gave this a first listen recently. From what I know about the film I expected Spanish sounds, and lots of swashbuckling. Well, the first thing you hear is a very Spanish-sounding chord to open the whole score, then a brief pause, and we continue with... surprise... SHAKUHACHI!!! I mean, it's Horner, duh, but still, lol.

 

The rest of the score had a lot less of an action/adventure feel than I was expecting, and the amount of danger motifs in the climax were a bit much for me. Overall I was a bit disappointed. But I'm still excited to listen again and hopefully discover everything there is to like about the score vs. my expectations. I did enjoy the Flamenco percussion (if that's the right term) quite a bit, and of course the smooth, silky Horner-ness of it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Smeltington said:

 

The rest of the score had a lot less of an action/adventure feel than I was expecting

 

Honestly that took me 25 years to get used to! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, Braveheart does kind of the same thing, it's full of epic battles and violence but the music doesn't always sound like "battle" music when you hear it on its own. That score has a much softer approach than you would expect given its subject matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, what's there is fantastic. It just feels a lot different from what another composer might have done. Or even from what Horner himself might have done earlier in his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That'll be something to look forward to one day.

 

20 hours ago, Yavar Moradi said:

almost no danger motif

 

Good, I don't want NO danger motif, it just wouldn't be right!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgive my lack of Horner slang vocabulary, what do we call the "Dundun dundun dundun dun..." that begins Kirk's Explosive Reply and Genesis Countdown or has a faster "bum bum bum bumpidy bum bum bum" in Flying Circus (~1:20)? Or another variation at 4:50ish in Nevile Sinclair's House? (I always called it "James' Theme".)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deniz Cordell's liner notes for the LLL edition of TWOK must talk about it (he talks about every recurring idea in the score), though I don't recall right now what he said about it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Tallguy said:

Forgive my lack of Horner slang vocabulary, what do we call the "Dundun dundun dundun dun..." that begins Kirk's Explosive Reply and Genesis Countdown or has a faster "bum bum bum bumpidy bum bum bum" in Flying Circus (~1:20)? Or another variation at 4:50ish in Nevile Sinclair's House? (I always called it "James' Theme".)

He seems to consistently apply it to moments of growing tension or plot development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Trope said:

He seems to consistently apply it to moments of growing tension or plot development.

 

Not to get too serious (and hopefully not serious at all at the same time): It's a Hornerism. And one of the first ones that I recognized as such. Blatantly so, I always thought.

 

What strikes me is that I never really noticed "The Danger Motif" so much until it became a thing or a meme or whatever. It's even referenced in the fairly wonderful Without James Horner video.

 

I would never mark it as an "essential" Horner ingredient. But to many it's THE Horner thing. To me it was always MUCH more the dundun dundun dundun thing.

 

OTOH, I was just talking to my brother last week and he talked about listening to some Horner thing (Avatar? We both hate Avatar) and he talked about how quickly the diddly do thing (Danger Motif) showed up. I laughed and told him "Yeah, but when I watched The Magnificent Seven for the first time that damn thing made me cry." It was like Jamie looking down and saying "Remember."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The danger motif is underrated anyway. It's one of the staples that militant Horner haters use to attack him and his music, but I still like it when it's well used. 

 

On the last few years of his career Horner gave it some pretty nice variations, like this one from Troy:

 

 

Or in Avatar, when the danger motif becomes less, well, action-y and more tragic:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like that he never (that I can recall/am aware of) reused the extended version of the danger motif he used for Kahn (which is a brilliant villain motif) so it remains unique to that score. Unlike when the Aliens are attacked by the Klingons…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 19/12/2023 at 7:26 PM, Levraibond said:

Listened to it this afternoon.

So great to finally hear these new tracks !

 

Now, don't get me wrong, I think this is a great release and aside from the "W" missing on the first page of my booklet I love it. But, yeah there had to be a "but" ... the transition from the amazing stellar sounding of the "Hook Ultimate Edition" to this score made me realize the sound quality is not as detailed and rich as the aforementioned one. I don't know if it's due to the original sessions (recording/setting artistic choice) ... or even a creative choice during the remastering process but I find the sound to be a little bit "muffled". It sounds very good, but when you compare it to the 2023 Hook Ultimate Edition, or even to another Horner, 2019 "Project X" mastered by MM for LLL there's a bit difference. It doesn't breathe as much.

 

I don't know about you, but I tend to find old analogic remastered recordings to sound way better than many "modern" digital recordings.

20231220_012024.jpg

 

 

 

This was produced by MM yes, but mastered by Doug Schwartz whereas Hook was mastered AND produced by MM. That would explain a difference in sound however I find this release to sound excellent so I don't understand the complaints. Not to mention these scores were composed and recorded by different people, Horner is no Williams and Williams is no Horner 😉😅

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm quite enjoying this music (hadn't heard the OST before), but can someone confirm if the overdriven/quasi-distorted bass at 0:57 in the Main Title is also present in the film? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 05/01/2024 at 10:45 PM, Jay said:

Deniz Cordell's liner notes for the LLL edition of TWOK must talk about it (he talks about every recurring idea in the score), though I don't recall right now what he said about it

 

I was going to look it up. Turns out I only have an FSM release from 2009. Is the LLL worth double dipping?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Breathmask said:

 

I was going to look it up. Turns out I only have an FSM release from 2009. Is the LLL worth double dipping?

 

Depends. It sounds great. It's nice to have the end titles with and without Nimoy. I like having the discrete tracks very much. And I'm the kind of nut who prefers the LP version of Battle in the Mutara Nebula with the moment of total silence rather than the tracked in wild ambient music, but still wants to have the film version.

 

The LP assembly from disc 2 is available on Spotify.

 

It's been a long time since I read them, but the liner notes are much more free form than the more standard "history / biography / track by track synopsis". I should go back and look at them again. One of the few (only?) Original Series era liner notes NOT written by Jeff "The Music of Star Trek" Bond. (I'm going to feel bad if it turns out someone else wrote 3-6 or something.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Breathmask said:

 

I was going to look it up. Turns out I only have an FSM release from 2009. Is the LLL worth double dipping?

 

Yes, definitely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 06/01/2024 at 11:59 PM, CatastrophicJones said:

 

This was produced by MM yes, but mastered by Doug Schwartz whereas Hook was mastered AND produced by MM. That would explain a difference in sound however I find this release to sound excellent so I don't understand the complaints. Not to mention these scores were composed and recorded by different people, Horner is no Williams and Williams is no Horner 😉😅

I'm not complaining. I'm observing the difference between these two scores, sound wise. I tend to prefer Hook to Mask Of Zorro on that pure technical, personal, sound preference. I love to spot some "studio noise" here and there. Makes it organic and alive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Levraibond said:

I'm not complaining. I'm observing the difference between these two scores, sound wise. I tend to prefer Hook to Mask Of Zorro on that pure technical, personal, sound preference. I love to spot some "studio noise" here and there. Makes it organic and alive.

 

Gotcha. That's fair enough! I'm enjoying both releases. Did you get Sneakers too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 09/01/2024 at 12:11 AM, CatastrophicJones said:

 

Gotcha. That's fair enough! I'm enjoying both releases. Did you get Sneakers too?

I had to pass on that one. I have to save some money as "Dad" is still on my want list, as well as Goldsmith's Alien & Poltergeist. Quartet Records re-release of Cutthroat Island too. Not to mention the future release of How To Train Your Dragon 3 Deluxe Edition :-D No release date yet but hopefully coming soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Levraibond said:

Not to mention the future release of How To Train Your Dragon 3 Deluxe Edition :-D No release date yet but hopefully coming soon.

 

That release date has been announced: February 23 :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Is there any difference between Zorro’s Theme (Film Version) and Zorro’s Theme, from the LLL Records release? Because I can’t tell the difference. 🤔😏

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of the album version was a different take than what went into the film.   The performances are practically identical though, for sure

 

If Neil S Bulk reads this and wants to email me a clarifying answer, I will post it here for him!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
4 hours ago, Holko said:

before the first proper cue ends, it's already ubiquitous, and completely obvious that this is the Zorro theme, as if it's been that since the silent movies and Disney series and all the others.

 

That's a great way to put it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Holko said:

Anyway, score's really fun and a really solid foundation, can't wait to hear Legend in 258 years when the AFM shit is revised!

Apparently Legend won't need the AFM approval. @Jean-Baptiste Martin revealed a while ago that Horner finished the score in June 2005, just a few days the AFM date of July 3rd, 2005. Fightplan and The New World on the other hand... :(

 

edit: here are his posts where he says that:

 

In other words: Horner finished TLoZ literally 6 days before the AFM date!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that's wonderful news indeed! Hopefully we can get Legend of Zorro as a companion release for Black Friday this year then :)

 

Then hopefully the AFM will start granting waivers for 2005 scores anyway, because it's nearly two decades ago for crying out loud!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Holko said:

but unlike with those there are no new takes on the character yet to live in its shadow.

I see nobody knows about the Spanish Amazon series... It's interesting though, the score is all over the place with some obvious temp tracks (going from Horner's MoZ to Paesano's Daredevil) and no real theme, not a memorable one at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, crumbs said:

Hopefully we can get Legend of Zorro as a companion release for Black Friday this year then :)

Yes, just like we got Spiderman 2 last year!

4 minutes ago, crumbs said:

Then hopefully the AFM will start granting wavers for 2005 scores anyway, because it's nearly two decades ago for crying out loud!

They'll probably revise the deal to be more in line with copyright laws! 95 years after everyone involved is dead!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Holko said:

Yes, just like we got Spiderman 2 last year!

I think Spidey 2 would be a little more than Zorro 2 complicated due to the numerous composers involved and the whole mess that was the recording sessions. Elfman being Elfman, would he lobby for just his music to be included and not the stuff written by Chris Young, John Debney and Deborah Lurie? Maybe, since he has worked with Raimi again after SM2, he got over the allegedly awful experience he had in SM2 and would see no problem in expanding that score? But wouldn't the whole copyrights thing be more complicated with at least 4 composers contributing to the score?

 

I dunno, I think someone should message LLL to see if they can answer if they are able to do Spiderman 2 or not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.