War Horse MUSIC Discussion Thread
#81
Posted 27 November 2011 - 04:10 PM
http://www.filmtrack.../war_horse.html
I can't believe he gave this one only four stars. This is a five stars score!
#82
Posted 27 November 2011 - 05:09 PM
"Let me say, however, there is no "next" John Williams. Sadly, he is unique--- a figure who simultaneously embodies and transcends the music of all the masters of film music who preceded him (much like Brahms and Wagner of the Romantic era). He comes from a time when the craft of music in film was still one of the ear, heart and mind. Today, sadly, the craft is largely technical. Most composers do not conceive their music "inwardly" but rather at the computer--- and with rather limited skills, musically, at that. The inner spirit knows no boundaries--- our plastic abilities, sadly, do. John is a man of spirit, heart, intellect and soaring music." -- Conrad Pope about John Williams
#83
Posted 27 November 2011 - 07:10 PM
#84
Posted 27 November 2011 - 07:29 PM
#85
Posted 27 November 2011 - 09:02 PM
Are there still people who hold Clemmensen's reviews in that high regard?
I think he does a good job. I disagree with him in this case, but his reviews are always a good read.
His biggest flaw as a reviewer is that sometimes he fails to see the forest for the trees. For example, he spent most of his time bitching about how PoA didn't keep in line with the series (and repeat Hedwig's theme enough), rather than seeing the wonderful music before him.
But even with that flaw, I'd say I hold his reviews in higher regard than most other reviewers.
#86
Posted 27 November 2011 - 10:20 PM
#87
Posted 27 November 2011 - 10:34 PM
#88
Posted 27 November 2011 - 11:15 PM
Valid point, but not enough to drag it down to 4 stars. I maintain that this is a solid 5 star score.
#89
Posted 27 November 2011 - 11:56 PM
#90
Posted 28 November 2011 - 12:56 AM
#91
Posted 28 November 2011 - 01:03 AM
He called Memoirs an "easy listen" though.
Memoirs is an easy listen.
#92
Posted 28 November 2011 - 01:24 AM
Are there still people who hold Clemmensen's reviews in that high regard?
I do.
Still haven't got to the score yet. It has been the score I've been looking forward to the most this year and I believe it will be a 5 star effort. And just because CC rates a score that others might not agree with in terms of the rating, it doesn't change the fact that he still writes fantastic reviews.
And after all, its HIS opinion. Why should anyone have to insult or undermine that? All reviews are subjective, and he is just expressing what he thought of the score with very solid arguments. No one asked anybody else to conform to it.
An excellent review, I say.
I don't understand the whole Filmtracks hate around here...
- KK
Music Muse Reviews: "Escape From Tomorrow by Abel Korzeniowski
#93
Posted 28 November 2011 - 01:25 AM
#94
Posted 28 November 2011 - 01:41 AM
#95
Posted 28 November 2011 - 01:47 AM
Music Muse Reviews: "Escape From Tomorrow by Abel Korzeniowski
#96
Posted 28 November 2011 - 01:48 AM
#97
Posted 28 November 2011 - 07:04 AM
That's how I interpreted it too. At any given moment in Memoirs, there's likely less going on in the orchestra than in RotS (a lot of Memoirs is solos or very sparse orchestrations). I don't think he was speaking to its compositional or thematic complexity.H never claimed it was "simplistic" in the sense you referred to. He meant to say that the score was easier on the ears, especially when compared to his other works of the same year (War of the Worlds and Revenge of the Sith). He still praises Williams for his masterful blend of Japanese and western styles. He never claimed it was simplistic in a compositional sense. Just easier on the ears when compared to something as dense as War of the Worlds...
I find Clemmensen's reviews to be interesting reads, even though I often disagree with him. They're very well thought out.
1. Nightwatch/Killer By Night - Johnny Williams and Quincy Jones 2. Diamond Head/Gone with the Wave - Johnny Williams/Lalo Schifrin 3. Mass - Leonard Bernstein 4. Bernstein with the New York Philharmonic - Leonard Bernstein
#98
Posted 28 November 2011 - 12:46 PM
Filmtracks review is up...
http://www.filmtrack.../war_horse.html
I can't believe he gave this one only four stars. This is a five stars score!
Reading his review is only good if you want to ruin the listening experience of a score...
I never liked his reviews.
#99
Posted 29 November 2011 - 04:57 AM
Why should that affect the listening experience? It's just some reviewers opinion.
Filmtracks review is up...
http://www.filmtrack.../war_horse.html
I can't believe he gave this one only four stars. This is a five stars score!
Reading his review is only good if you want to ruin the listening experience of a score...
I never liked his reviews.
#100
Posted 29 November 2011 - 07:40 AM
Why should that affect the listening experience? It's just some reviewers opinion.
I was only (half) kidding to make my point that I think his reviews are really bad...
#101
Posted 29 November 2011 - 07:27 AM
Anybody else hear that? I don't know how you call it--maybe "distortion" is not the right word--but it's a sort of "thrrrrrraaaappppp" in the background...
#102
Posted 29 November 2011 - 07:55 AM
Ars superior est vita hominum.
"We pop out and come into the world and music is there. We didn't invent it - it's all organised in the atmosphere by divinity or whatever. It's a miracle." - John Williams-
I think music is a stream of some kind. It could be blood. It could be water. It could be ether. Whatever it is it seems to be a living, organic force that’s in motion, that serves humanity and is part of humanity and part of what describes us as humans. We sing, play, dance, all the things that we do. And there is a vibrant and great literature we have been given. ... As musicians, we join the stream. We swim in the stream with all the other millions of music makers. It’s a life force, a strong one, surrounding us and we are part of it. -John Williams-
#103
Posted 29 November 2011 - 08:01 AM
It bothers me quite a lot...
I am the only one who feels that way? You can turn the volume down, then it's not so noticeable, but it's still annoying as hell.
In comparison the brass section in "Hymn to the Fallen" for example was recorded perfectly! No "distortions" whatsoever!
#104
Posted 29 November 2011 - 08:43 AM
#105
Posted 29 November 2011 - 08:47 AM
I am pretty sure that's not done by the instruments... rather it's the way that section was recorded. "An undertone," "a distortion"... it's rather distracting. And I believe I hear that in the trailer (where this music was used) as well.
#106
Posted 29 November 2011 - 09:19 AM
"Let me say, however, there is no "next" John Williams. Sadly, he is unique--- a figure who simultaneously embodies and transcends the music of all the masters of film music who preceded him (much like Brahms and Wagner of the Romantic era). He comes from a time when the craft of music in film was still one of the ear, heart and mind. Today, sadly, the craft is largely technical. Most composers do not conceive their music "inwardly" but rather at the computer--- and with rather limited skills, musically, at that. The inner spirit knows no boundaries--- our plastic abilities, sadly, do. John is a man of spirit, heart, intellect and soaring music." -- Conrad Pope about John Williams
#107
Posted 29 November 2011 - 09:20 AM
#108
Posted 29 November 2011 - 09:27 AM
"Let me say, however, there is no "next" John Williams. Sadly, he is unique--- a figure who simultaneously embodies and transcends the music of all the masters of film music who preceded him (much like Brahms and Wagner of the Romantic era). He comes from a time when the craft of music in film was still one of the ear, heart and mind. Today, sadly, the craft is largely technical. Most composers do not conceive their music "inwardly" but rather at the computer--- and with rather limited skills, musically, at that. The inner spirit knows no boundaries--- our plastic abilities, sadly, do. John is a man of spirit, heart, intellect and soaring music." -- Conrad Pope about John Williams
#109
Posted 29 November 2011 - 09:30 AM
#110
Posted 29 November 2011 - 11:50 AM
#111
Posted 29 November 2011 - 12:12 PM
#112
Posted 29 November 2011 - 02:21 PM
#113
Posted 29 November 2011 - 02:32 PM
In my experience, the actual CD sounds MUCH better than the official mp3s Sony sent out for review purposes. Listening to both in my car, the promotional mp3s would get distorted at the loud parts, while the retail CD does not. Also there was a blip between tracks 7&8 and tracks 12&13 on the promotional mp3s (since the tracks overlap) that is thankfully gone on the real CD (obviously).
Perhaps the Amazon and iTunes mp3s suffer from the same problems as the promotional Sony mp3s.
And I agree with the intent of Ricard's post - asking questions about the sound quality of illegal mp3s is completely pointless. Of course they might sound bad, who knows where the heck they were sourced from or what wacky encoder somebody used to make them. Starting a thread about the sound quality of illegal mp3s is just........ dumb. But if the official legal mp3s have sound problems, that certainly could be discussed. I don't have much experience with amazon mp3s (are they still 256kbps?), but I know the iTunes AACs are considered to generally be pretty good. A lot of European retailers sell mp3s at various bitrates I think, and I believe there are sites that sell lossless downloads as well. I just have no experience with them.
#114
Posted 29 November 2011 - 02:41 PM
#116
Posted 29 November 2011 - 03:49 PM
Asking a question about a distortion in illegal mp3s certainly is useless, and I would hope people are smart enough to realize that.
But if the legal mp3s sold by Amazon or iTunes (or wherever) have distortion then that is a problem.
The real problem is that nobody said anything about ILLEGAL mp3's until Ricard did. I for one assumed the discussion was about PURCHASED mp3's. That seemed highly valid to me.
#117
Posted 29 November 2011 - 08:32 PM
Then the back of the CD is so simplistic that it feels like one of those cheap synth re-recording CD's. The print on the CD itself is likewise very simplistic and lacks the classy feel of - let's say - Tintin. The only redeeming thing about it seems to be the inside pages of the booklet.
Is it just me..?
#118
Posted 29 November 2011 - 08:39 PM
#119
Posted 29 November 2011 - 08:55 PM
Hey, that's because of you that we got such a cover!
#120
Posted 29 November 2011 - 11:40 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












