#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 No! Ricard 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unlucky Bastard 7,782 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Once and Pieter Boelen 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unlucky Bastard 7,782 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 His moustache is still alive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 They keep banging on about a black James Bond, or a female Doctor Who, so how about dumping Ford and getting progressive with Indiana Jones? Pieter Boelen 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Pieter Boelen 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 2 minutes ago, Quintus said: They keep banging on about a black James Bond, or a female Doctor Who, so how about dumping Ford and getting progressive with Indiana Jones? Yes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Stu 15,495 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 I'm all for a female Indy, but she needs to look realistically like an academic. Not like a stripper (not that there's anything wrong with that!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 She will need to look like a younger Germaine Greer obviously Unlucky Bastard 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Pieter Boelen 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Lara Croft will have to be played by Pratt, obviously! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Who could also play Indiana Jones! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Guys, it's time for an intrepid archaeologists crossover movie. Indiana Jones Vs Lara Croft or Indy and Lara: Romancing the Bone. Those are the options. Pieter Boelen 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mstrox 6,651 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Hard to think of an Archaeology Cinematic Universe that doesn't also involve Brendan Fraser's character from The Mummy. Pieter Boelen 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Stu 15,495 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 I believe you mean Rachel Weisz's character, since she was the Egyptologist, not Fraser. Pieter Boelen 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 The sheer mention of her name generates sperm in men. Gruesome Son of a Bitch 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Grrrr.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Unlucky Bastard and Matt C 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 I'll be in my bunk! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unlucky Bastard 7,782 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Wouldn't she be like 47 now? Her best years are gone! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 There's plenty of fine looking, very sexy women at that age. Peggy Lipton was in her forties in Twin Peaks and she was absolutely stunning. There's a lady in Transparent I'm watching called Amy Landecker, she's 47 and still very attractive (and damn sexy). Some women age better than others, same as men do. How old are you now Drax? Unlucky Bastard 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Attractive, older woman are probably sexually threatening to Drax. Unlucky Bastard and Matt C 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Aren't women of all ages to him though? LIKED #SnowyVernalSpringsEternal and Unlucky Bastard 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pieter Boelen 740 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 The above posts on this page were an absolute pleasure to read! Glorious comedy value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightscape94 965 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 I like where this thread is going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unlucky Bastard 7,782 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 7 hours ago, Quintus said: Some women age better than others, same as men do. How old are you now Drax? With plastic surgery, they can at least try! I'm 13. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gruesome Son of a Bitch 6,488 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Why was Rachel Weisz cute in the first Mummy and a Goddess in the second? They were only filmed a couple years apart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unlucky Bastard 7,782 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 More eye liner and cleavage? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt C 455 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 I don't think this is going to happen. The year delay is just to save face, and it's just not a priority for Spielberg, Ford or the Mouse House. And Disney's being a dick with taking out all these dates and all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,373 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 11 hours ago, Matt C said: I don't think this is going to happen. The year delay is just to save face, and it's just not a priority for Spielberg, Ford or the Mouse House. Very likely, yea. 11 hours ago, Matt C said: And Disney's being a dick with taking out all these dates and all. What does this mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Stu 15,495 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Yeah, all the major studios schedule out their tentpole films like that. It's actually nice of them because then Paramount or Warner Bros. or whoever have more information to help them schedule their movies. Once 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,373 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Yea, I don't see the problem. Once 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick1Ø66 4,722 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 It's not a problem, but Disney isn't doing it to be nice or helpful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 It's part of the industry and has been for decades! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightscape94 965 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Planting a flagpole 3 years out has been part of the industry for decades? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,373 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Since the 2000s it has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Stu 15,495 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 There are only so many weekends in a Summer. In the current tentpole film climate, there has to be advance planning and coordination between studios. There just has to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightscape94 965 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 9 minutes ago, Jay said: Since the 2000s it has. Right, so about, what, 15 years, at most? Not that long in the grand scheme of things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,373 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 10 minutes ago, Disco Stu said: There are only so many weekends in a Summer. In the current tentpole film climate, there has to be advance planning and coordination between studios. There just has to be. Yup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick1Ø66 4,722 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 They obviously have to do advance planning but really don't "coordinate" so to speak. The big dog wins. When a studio says they're staking out X date for a tentpole, it's a signal to the other studios to stay away. If another studio thinks they have something bigger and more appealing, and puts it on that date, the first studio can move off...it's happened before. No one is doing it to be nice or helpful to a rival studio. Disney isn't announcing this now so James Cameron can better make his Avatar plans. They're taking those dates because they can...and it's whats best for their films. Nothing wrong with that at all. Ever watch Planet Earth? Look at the Lions. You've got the alpha male, who defends his territory and is king of the hill...until a bigger male comes along and he has to bolt. Same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Once 605 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 But why are they dicks for announcing it? Should they wait until a week before the premiere? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick1Ø66 4,722 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 17 hours ago, Matt C said: I don't think this is going to happen. The year delay is just to save face, and it's just not a priority for Spielberg, Ford or the Mouse House. Of course it's going to happen. Disney has top men working on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Stu 15,495 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 I'm blindly allowing myself to hope it's because they're getting rid of Koepp and starting over on the script. Make my fantasy reality, Steven. crumbs and Not Mr. Big 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unlucky Bastard 7,782 Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 5 hours ago, Nick1066 said: Of course it's going to happen. Disney has top men working on it. Whoooo? Amer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crumbs 14,319 Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 8 hours ago, Disco Stu said: I'm blindly allowing myself to hope it's because they're getting rid of Koepp and starting over on the script. Make my fantasy reality, Steven. A year's delay hopefully means various key people aren't happy with his script. Production was still at least a year away and yet they delayed the whole film for another 12 months - doesn't strike me as a script they have much faith in, and he's already been working on it for over a year. Hopefully Koepp is replaced. Or perhaps another project came onto Spielberg's radar that he's fast tracking for 2018? Mortara? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amer 2,117 Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 4 hours ago, Godzilla said: Whoooo? Top..Men! Pieter Boelen and Unlucky Bastard 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 Will and crumbs 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick1Ø66 4,722 Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 7 minutes ago, BloodBoal said: Or maybe, it means Spielberg got another idea 12 hours ago, crumbs said: A year's delay hopefully means various key people aren't happy with his script. Production was still at least a year away and yet they delayed the whole film for another 12 months - doesn't strike me as a script they have much faith in, and he's already been working on it for over a year. Hopefully Koepp is replaced. Or perhaps another project came onto Spielberg's radar that he's fast tracking for 2018? Mortara? I think Disney just figured with Covenant, Arrival, Life, etc. it would be better to wait a while before releasing another movie featuring aliens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now