Thor 7,508 Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 For some reason, unless this movie really IS about dinosaurs attacking people off the island (god I hope not), I feel like this is a soft reboot if it goes with the "new park" angle. It could still tie in as a result of the other films, but somehow I don't think we will get any returning cast members. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Skywalker 1,795 Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 when i saw this on facebook i thought that maybe, since they are doing a walking with dinosaurs movie this christmas, they ere doing a Jurassic park feature documentary too...AM I the only one thinkning that the footage shown there is crappy? it look like a videogame, or a pre-viz. So it's really good, but no movie quality... so i dont know why people are praising it.Did pablo hidalgo present this? it's really weird, since ILM has only worked in videogames for Bounty hunter and the Force unleashed games....BTW shame thay canceled that game, could have been interesting.I hope they dont change very much the designs of the dinosaurs...I also dont like the rebooty feeling. Maybe only if they do something as faithful as possible to the original books... but williams music must endure...or it will be crap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharkissimo 1,973 Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 https://twitter.com/IncredibleSuit Jurassic World: Five velociraptors zip round London in their luxurious tour bus having various adventures and performing for their fans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muad'Dib 1,802 Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 I would see that!Then again... I would see practically everything that features Raptors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unlucky Bastard 7,782 Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 What's a "soft reboot"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wycket 36 Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 Think Superman Returns. Takes elements from previous films, but establishes its own continuity and builds off of that. I guess the new Star Trek movies can also be seen as in this mold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A. A. Ron 1,742 Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 That definition doesn't make any sense. ALL reboots are going to take "elements" from previous entries in the series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wojo 2,453 Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 Superman Returns wasn't a soft reboot. It was a sequel to Superman II that ignored III and IV, was totally recast, and somehow compressed the 25+ year gap into about a five year absence. That's it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt C 454 Posted September 15, 2013 Share Posted September 15, 2013 Phil Tippett is back as dinosaur supervisor.https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/377837820921905152 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,368 Posted September 15, 2013 Share Posted September 15, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted September 15, 2013 Share Posted September 15, 2013 Lol! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Skywalker 1,795 Posted September 15, 2013 Share Posted September 15, 2013 that's good news because one of the success of JP in creating believable animal movements was his work.The other two movies didnt have him, and in an era of full CGI frenzy you have to tell the cgi animators how to animate animals...(seeing a lot of crap lately on films...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brónach 1,302 Posted September 15, 2013 Share Posted September 15, 2013 One could say that part of the job of an animator is to look very closely at reality and learn from it :-/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Skywalker 1,795 Posted September 15, 2013 Share Posted September 15, 2013 but with heavily cgi movies, i think they dont have as much time as they spent in JP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gkgyver 1,645 Posted September 15, 2013 Share Posted September 15, 2013 Think Superman Returns. Takes elements from previous films, but establishes its own continuity and builds off of that and mixes them together wildy in a mediocre script so that the audience leaves confused and slightly bored. I guess the new Star Trek movies can also be seen as in this mold can be considered examples of how to do it right.Fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A. A. Ron 1,742 Posted September 15, 2013 Share Posted September 15, 2013 Think Superman Returns. Takes elements from previous films, but establishes its own continuity and builds off of that and mixes them together wildy in a mediocre script so that the audience leaves confused and slightly bored. I guess the new Star Trek movies can also be seen as in this mold can be considered examples of how to do it right.Fixed.If you think Star Trek Into Darkness is in any way an example of how to do this right, I weep for the future of Trek. There's only so much that a good cast and good sets can do with a garbage script like that. It would have been a complete waste if it hadn't been for Giacchino. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paleo 63 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Maybe the word "world" refers to something like a bigger theme park... like in "Disney World"... Perhaps InGen will attempt to pull it off again - only bigger... just a thought ... ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koray Savas 2,251 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Maybe the word "world" refers to something like a bigger theme park... like in "Disney World"... Perhaps InGen will attempt to pull it off again - only bigger... just a thought ... ;-)I thought that was obvious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,368 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 It was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuck 154 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 It just needs to be repeated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paleo 63 Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 Sorry, I should have read ALL of Scallenger's posts... ;-) (I was actually first thinking about dinosaurs "out in the wider world", but maybe that's because I am a non-native English speaker). In any case, I sort of like the idea of a new park Once 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt C 454 Posted September 26, 2013 Share Posted September 26, 2013 Well, Bryce Dallas Howard is indeed in early talks for Jurassic World (as in just receiving an offer). No word on who her character is yet.http://www.thewrap.com/bryce-dallas-howard-in-early-talks-to-star-in-universals-jurassic-world-exclusive/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuck 154 Posted September 26, 2013 Share Posted September 26, 2013 Sam Neill was in yet?Guy's too old for this shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muad'Dib 1,802 Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 My main hope is that they go with a cinematography that fits nicely with the other three, not the modern digital squeaky-clean view where everything is so fucking bright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt C 454 Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 My main hope is that they go with a cinematography that fits nicely with the other three, not the modern digital squeaky-clean view where everything is so fucking bright.The digital cinematography is getting better and better every year -- but I wish studios would give filmmakers the choice between film and digital just for flexibility. Some of the digital photography is done so well, where you thought it was shot on film. I'm thinking of The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, The Wolverine, We're the Millers, 21 Jump Street and "Game of Thrones."Plus the trades say that the studio will have Jurassic World shot and rendered in 3D (can't happen with 35mm), so they're bound to shoot it digitally. The best they can do is get a DP who can approximate a similar look, which isn't too hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muad'Dib 1,802 Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Oh, I know they're probably gonna go digital anyway. And I know digital can be done very well. But I'm talking about that Michael Bay-look that's become a plague on modern blockbusters. Indy 4 suffered greatly of this I think. I don't want that ultra-bright look for JP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brónach 1,302 Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 I like a lot how the first one looks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koray Savas 2,251 Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Oh, I know they're probably gonna go digital anyway. And I know digital can be done very well. But I'm talking about that Michael Bay-look that's become a plague on modern blockbusters. Indy 4 suffered greatly of this I think. I don't want that ultra-bright look for JP.No, Indy 4 suffered greatly of Janusz Kaminski. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt C 454 Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Oh, I know they're probably gonna go digital anyway. And I know digital can be done very well. But I'm talking about that Michael Bay-look that's become a plague on modern blockbusters. Indy 4 suffered greatly of this I think. I don't want that ultra-bright look for JP.No, Indy 4 suffered greatly of Janusz Kaminski.Kaminski is no Douglas Sloacombe, that's for sure. I think he and Spielberg were trying too hard to approximate the old look, and it just didn't look right with Kaminski's aesthetic. There were select shots where Kaminski actually pulled it off, but they were few and far between. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuck 154 Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Why go with the old look? It's not like the new film's time frame is set in 1993. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Oh, I know they're probably gonna go digital anyway. And I know digital can be done very well. But I'm talking about that Michael Bay-look that's become a plague on modern blockbusters. Indy 4 suffered greatly of this I think. I don't want that ultra-bright look for JP.Indy 4 was shot on 35 mm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muad'Dib 1,802 Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Really? What a waste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuck 154 Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Meh. As long as they portray the carnotaurs like in the novels, that would be pretty awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Really? What a waste.Spielberg doesn't shoot digital, with the exception of Tintin. (Which wasnt really shot anyway) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muad'Dib 1,802 Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 The transition from film to digital is not easy. Not every director can handle it. Coppola's newest movies greatly suffer from this, in my opinion. Although the bad scripts don't help either. Meh. As long as they portray the carnotaurs like in the novels, that would be pretty awesome. Yeah, that would be awesome. It's a mistery how they completely ignored the novel in the sequels. Although it's quite clear Chricton's heart wasn't on it much, there were some great ideas in there to take advantage of in the movies. Particularly the DX subplot, the bike chase and, of course, the Carnotaurus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuck 154 Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 When I saw the Carnotaurs in the Disney flick Dinosaurs, I thought they're gonna have that special ability that Crichton says they have in TLW but I was disappointed. Even when they finally have the carnotaurs in JP3 they still didn't let them display it. That would've made them a one scene great cameo there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muad'Dib 1,802 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Yeah, the Carnos in Dinosaur were more like T-Rexes with horns. Carnos weren't that big.And also, there was no Carno in JPIII. You probably mean the Ceratosaurus, which has a horn on its nose.Don't want to come of as an ass, sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuck 154 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 The one that's eating dung? Yeah, I thought that was a carnotaur. Thanks for the correction! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A. A. Ron 1,742 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 It didn't eat dung, it just showed up while the main characters were digging through Spinosaurus dung looking for a ringing satellite phone. It just kinda looked at them then left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuck 154 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Well, okay... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt C 454 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 Ty Simpkins (Iron Man 3) and Jake Johnson ("New Girl") are joining Bryce Dallas Howard in Jurassic World.http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/179765-iron-man-3s-ty-simpkins-lands-lead-role-in-jurassic-world Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Score_Fan 36 Posted October 15, 2013 Share Posted October 15, 2013 Not bad, I actually really liked him in IM3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gkgyver 1,645 Posted October 15, 2013 Share Posted October 15, 2013 The bad feeling I have about this movie is epic. Gruesome Son of a Bitch 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt C 454 Posted October 15, 2013 Share Posted October 15, 2013 Kid characters don't always ruin a movie. It's all about the way they're handled, script-wise and direction-wise. If Simpkins' character is handled well, like Ariana and Joseph were in the first pic, I wouldn't worry about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor 7,508 Posted October 15, 2013 Share Posted October 15, 2013 It will be gobsmackingly awesome!!God, I can't believe it's been 13 years since the last one. If I'd had a kid at the time, he would have been a teenager now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gkgyver 1,645 Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 It's been 13 years for a good reason. JP 3 was mediocre AT BEST. The best thing was Davis' score. I wonder which guy is allowed another go at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightscape94 965 Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 Until I see a dinosaur then I am uninterested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koray Savas 2,251 Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 What if you saw this? Once 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightscape94 965 Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 I never said I couldn't be persuaded, but throwing Goldblum at me is unfair. That's like dangling a steak in front of a starving child. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor 7,508 Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 It's been 13 years for a good reason. JP 3 was mediocre AT BEST. The best thing was Davis' score. I wonder which guy is allowed another go at it.I thought JP3 was a wonderful film, albeit a tad too short. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now