Jump to content

What Is The Last Film You Watched? (Older Films)


Mr. Breathmask

Recommended Posts

The best part was Elijah Wood outrunning a tsunami up a hillside on a scrambler. Everything else is a blur.

Oh hang on I lie! Wasn't it Vanessa Redgrave who hugged her father on the beach to a spectacular watery death? That was absolutely hilarious!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Safe House: A spy movie that keeps the camera extrememly close to the action and the fighting choreography. You guessed it! It's a Bourne wannabe! Denzel Washington's iconicity is even distracting. The film does have a few entertaining scenes but knows only one tone or emotion: Everything is serious and important. 5/10

safe_house_zpsa8ab19b4.jpg

Alex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you ever start watching a film, realising at some point that it seems familiar, and then finding out that you have indeed seen it in the past? :P

Happened to me yesterday.

Fortunately I realised it at 10 minutes.

I guess I'm watching way too many movies..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contact was a really intriguing and enjoyable movie I seem to remember; until the stupid ending completely unravelled and rubbished everything before it. Meh.

What specifically did you find stupid about the ending?

Did you ever start watching a film, realising at some point that it seems familiar, and then finding out that you have indeed seen it in the past? :P

My father used to do that. Multiple times for the same films, in fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gone With the Wind

The popularity of the film eludes me. First half of the film is pretty engaging, but the post-intermission stuff is right out of a soap opera. It's still a beautifully mounted film with great production values and crisp Technicolor photography, I just find this a hugely overrated film. I like older films, especially The Adventures of Robin Hood and Thief of Bagdad, but GWTW doesn't do anything for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My mum too

Though often she would have no memory of seeing it before

I sometimes had an argument with him halfway through a film when he didn't believe me that he'd already seen it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contact was a really intriguing and enjoyable movie I seem to remember; until the stupid ending completely unravelled and rubbished everything before it. Meh.

The ending was wonderful. Why didn't you like it?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let the Right One In

Tomas Alfredson absolutely nails the atmosphere of 1980s Sweden, with beautifully understated performances by Kare Hedebrant and Lina Leandersson in the lead roles. It doesn't shy away from the blood, but on the other hand it is restrained and tasteful in the bloody and violent subject matter. (Like when Eli attacks Lacke, bloodless apart from his bloody hand on the door.) And tremendous kudos to Hoyte van Hoytema's stunning photography, with some complex but understated shots.

And the score is exquisite, fits the movie perfectly. A modern horror film that actually deserves the praise heaped on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's physically and mentally draining to watch. Never have I ever wanted to look away from the screen while watching a film before.

I think it's well made with interesting symbolism but I don't think I ever want to endure it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ANTICHRIST is trash, a snuff movie posing as an art house film. Von Trier's is one of the craftiest frauds in the industry. I have much respect for that guy.

Which is interesting because by its very definition, a snuff film could not exist within a studio system (even an independent one).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ANTICHRIST is trash, a snuff movie posing as an art house film. Von Trier's is one of the craftiest frauds in the industry. I have much respect for that guy.

Which is interesting because by its very definition, a snuff film could not exist within a studio system (even an independent one).

Well exactly. It's dressed up as an art house film, so it gets a free pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ANTICHRIST is trash, a snuff movie posing as an art house film. Von Trier's is one of the craftiest frauds in the industry. I have much respect for that guy.

Which is interesting because by its very definition, a snuff film could not exist within a studio system (even an independent one).

Well exactly. It's dressed up as an art house film, so it gets a free pass.

So if I produced a film based on The Rape of Lucrece (and taking unlimited artistic license with the "rape" part) and call it an "art house" film, it would be totally kosher?

:eh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ANTICHRIST is trash, a snuff movie posing as an art house film. Von Trier's is one of the craftiest frauds in the industry. I have much respect for that guy.

Which is interesting because by its very definition, a snuff film could not exist within a studio system (even an independent one).

Well exactly. It's dressed up as an art house film, so it gets a free pass.

So if I produced a film based on The Rape of Lucrece (and taking unlimited artistic license with the "rape" part) and call it an "art house" film, it would be totally kosher?

:eh:

Well, if you hired some daring and exhibitionist actors/actresses, had a reputation as an avant-garde provocateur, a sizeable following within the cultural elite, and reliable producers and distributors - you'd might get it premiered at Cannes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ANTICHRIST is trash, a snuff movie posing as an art house film. Von Trier's is one of the craftiest frauds in the industry. I have much respect for that guy.

Which is interesting because by its very definition, a snuff film could not exist within a studio system (even an independent one).

Well exactly. It's dressed up as an art house film, so it gets a free pass.

So if I produced a film based on The Rape of Lucrece (and taking unlimited artistic license with the "rape" part) and call it an "art house" film, it would be totally kosher?

:eh:

Well, if you hired some daring and exhibitionist actors/actresses, had a reputation as an avant-garde provocateur, a sizeable following within the cultural elite, and reliable producers and distributors - you'd might get it premiered at Cannes.

Cannes: the film festival where you can literally rape your way to a Palme d'Or and not get flak from your audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.