Jump to content

What Is The Last Film You Watched? (Older Films)


Mr. Breathmask

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, GerateWohl said:

Besides science fiction there is another futuristic genre, that in German is called "Endzeit" movie. It are these dystopic films that more or less started with Mad Max I think, showing earth in future after 3rd world war or just dried out and last humans fighting for resources. Sometimes it is combined with science fiction. But basically this is not science fiction.

 

It's fiction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jurassic Shark said:

 

It's fiction.

Every story that is not just telling actual events is fiction, I thought.

 

By the way, that was something, that made the MCU in the beginniing interesting as Iron Man, Captain America and Hulk were classical science fiction and Thor was classical fantasy. Dr. Strange was something in the middle or fantasy pretending to be science fiction. But the way these genres were merged in addition as classical action movies was very clever.

In the beginning.

Not anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AC1 said:

Spielberg's A.I. is science fiction.

 

Planet Of The Apes is not.

 

Gattaca is science fiction.

 

Independence Day is not.

 

Blade Runner is science fiction.

 

Alien is not.


That’s just “hard” science fiction and “soft” science fiction…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Nick1Ø66 said:

Isn't Star Wars usually (and most aptly) called a space opera? 

 

It's also called science fantasy. But so is Dune. And even Star Trek. Though I'd call the latter two science fiction. Though purists wouldn't.

 

Trek certainly has a ton of science in it, *and* it's set in the future, and it's very much based on comparing that imagined future to our present (even with the idea that it's an attainable utopia) as well as on the implications of whatever new technologies are invented in the future. So that qualifies for any definition of scifi I've yet seen.

 

Dune is more difficult. It *feels* like scifi, but really it's not so much either scifi or fantasy as it is philosophical/religious/political speculative fiction.

 

10 hours ago, Jay said:

I've spent my life under the assumption that anything set in our future is science fiction. Never heard anyone argue otherwise until now 

 

If there's any relevance to why it is called *science* fiction, there must be more to it than that - and considering the scope of "classic" scifi (not the scope of the story, but the scope of the examined themes), I think there's a good reason for the name.

 

But in any case, as others have pointed out, even if just being set in the future classifies something as scifi, SW's first line still disqualifies it.

 

5 hours ago, GerateWohl said:

Besides science fiction there is another futuristic genre, that in German is called "Endzeit" movie. It are these dystopic films that more or less started with Mad Max I think, showing earth in future after 3rd world war or just dried out and last humans fighting for resources. Sometimes it is combined with science fiction. But basically this is not science fiction.

 

Before long it will be called "documentary".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, AC1 said:

Spielberg's A.I. is science fiction.

Planet Of The Apes is not.

Gattaca is science fiction.

Independence Day is not.

Blade Runner is science fiction.

Alien is not.

Hope this helps ...

Partially

 

A.I. is science fiction

PLANET OF THE APES is science fiction

GATTACA is not 

ID4 is science fiction 

BLADE RUNNER is science fiction

ALIEN is science fiction 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, GerateWohl said:

:blink:

 

Indeed. It's probably the most sci-fi of the bunch and one that is very close to become reality. It's also one of the few sci-fi movies that actually Is about the science at hand (genetic modifiction) and its effect on the characters.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I think pretty much every movie being discussed here can broadly be called “science fiction”, as the term is commonly understood. We can discuss sub-genres and debate which films belong in each…space opera, space fantasy, science fantasy, hard sci-fi, military sci-fi, cyberpunk, apocalyptic, dystopian, etc. But generally speaking, it’s all science fiction.

 

I think Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart's comments about pornography apply here to science fiction as well..."I can't define it, but I know it when I see it".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Naïve Old Fart said:

No.

 

Eternal Sunshine is like textbook science fiction. It's exploring what technology does to the human condition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Tallguy said:

Eternal Sunshine is like textbook science fiction. It's exploring what technology does to the human condition.

 

Rather than starting with science and exploring what effects it has, it rather starts with people and uses a science fiction device to explore timeless issues. That's why I wouldn't focus on the scifi element as a central aspect of the film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Nick1Ø66 said:

Wiki tells me all these films are science fiction. Moonraker is described as "spy-fi".  Which I admit is a new one to me. 

I'd like to watch more "spy-fi" movies. Imagine a Bond-like character in a futuristic setting dealing with a mission that involves robots, aliens, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had no cable or internet after my area was hit by a tornado. So we watched dvds. We watched This Island Earth, one of my favorite 50's scifi films i was convinced I had it in bluray but I sas mistaken. i will soon however. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gremlins1.jpg

 

This and Temple of Doom were the two "kids" movies from 1984 so dark and violent that the PG13 rating needed to be created. Out of these two, I had only seen ToD, so I decided to give Gremlins a shot yesterday during a plane trip.

 

It's terrifically fun! Yeah, I can imagine parents of very young children in 1984 taking them to what was supposed to be another ET-like adventure and being surprised with the many horrific scenes, brilliantly directed and shot by Dante. But all of this is balanced by a very fairy-tale-like setting and script, that gives the movie a whole new atmosphere - kinda like the violent fairy tales of centuries past that used their darkness to tell children lessons.

 

Jerry Goldsmith's score is amazing and exactly what the film needs. Yet, I don't feel compelled to actually listen to it on the album. The humorous synth effects may work amazingly well with the movie, but it's not something I'd actually like to listen to separately. Anyway, the action cues are terrific.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had seen Gremlins 2 on cable a decade or so ago, and I liked it. But now that I've seen the first one for the first time, it made me want to revisit The New Batch, which is less scary and more silly (in a good way) than the first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JNHFan2000 said:

I think The New Batch is both a better film and has a better Goldsmith score.

Hell, he's even in it! How great is that

“Did someone say rats?” Yogurt customer. It’s a classic role.

 

It’s become a weird piece of family history that my uncle let me and my sister watch Gremlins when we were both pre-teen much to the horror of my parents. I think they assumed it was much more of a horror movie than a dark comedy (albeit perhaps not totally suited to our age at the time). Even more ridiculous as I watched Jaws at a similar age and that’s considerably more scary for a ten year old!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weirdly, if I had a 6 or 7 year old kid, I'd be more comfortable watching with him or her Gremlins 2 than 1. The New Batch is mostly a delightfully funny live-action cartoon in a Looney Tunes style - heck, there's even a Daffy and Bugs Bunny cameo mocking the WB logo. But without the creepiness of the first one, which is great but mays be too intense for small kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Jay said:

 

5s3lebytwtf61.jpg?width=682&auto=webp&v=

And to think James Horner got a cameo in one of his first breakthrough movies. Bet Jerry wished he’d been cast as a flying ace in The Blue Max or third chimp in POTA. Mind you, did JW have a cameo before his appearance in the last Star Wars film?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tallguy said:

People talk about how Temple of Doom and Gremlins ushered in the PG-13 rating but they tend to leave out that it was Raiders of the Lost Ark that had them ready to pull the trigger in the first place.


Yes, Raiders getting rated PG was also a huge bone of contention in its day.

 

But it’s really Gremlins - not either Indy films - that was the immediate instigator of the change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Marian Schedenig said:

Basil Poledouris had his cameo long before his film scoring career.

Wasn’t it more that he was an extra?

 

3 minutes ago, Naïve Old Fart said:

Where, when, and in what, @Marian Schedenig?

I assume it was that time he was in Star Trek.  

1 minute ago, Marian Schedenig said:

 

 

Yeah that haha. Basil scoring Star Trek. We’ll never know. Alas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.