Jump to content

What Is The Last Film You Watched? (Older Films)


Mr. Breathmask

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, mrbellamy said:

 

Spielberg isn't usually thought of as an actor's director, but it's interesting to note the famous or acclaimed actors who had early breakout roles in a Spielberg film and it's still considered among their very best work, if not THE best. I count Drew Barrymore, Christian Bale, Whoopi Goldberg, Ralph Fiennes, and Djimon Hounsou.

 

And on a semi-related note, it's kinda fun to remember actors who had "before they were famous" roles in a Spielberg movie before hitting greater heights. Ben Stiller, Vince Vaughn, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Vin Diesel, Bryan Cranston, Nathan Fillion, Paul Giamatti, Amy Adams, Elizabeth Banks, Adam Driver.

 

Even Oprah!

Yeah but half of those were just tiny roles in Saving Private Ryan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977) (1st time)

 

For some reason this film has always escaped me. It is never shown on TV around here, I never see it talked about anywhere. So I really went into this not knowing at all what to expect.

 

But overall, I really enjoyed it. There were a few things which particularly caught my attention in this film, which I'd like to mention:

 

I found it interesting how the audience (or atleast myself) isn't really told what's going on all the time. There were many times in the film where I didn't feel like I had a grasp on what the story is about. But the way in which it was done was fine, because the protagonists themselves don't have a grasp on...well, almost anything. It is quite remarkable how Spielberg managed to make the audience feel a bit lost and mystified, but in an intentional, good way. That was the main "experience" I took away from it. 

 

[Spoilers till the end]

 

I also felt something tragic about Roy's departure. The last time his family saw him was in a "deranged" state, making mountains out of mashed potatoes, lying in the shower, throwing plants into the house. They felt they had to escape from him, just as one would escape from an abusive husband. And it is quite possible that they will never see Roy again. And yet, him peacefully boarding an alien spaceship is an extraordinary moment for humanity. There's something beautifully sublime about it which I cannot quite describe, and in a way it "pays off" the entire film.

 

Now for Williams' score. I was quite surprised by how subdued the score was for the majority of the film. Mostly it only seemed to appear in a march form, or when it accompanied major shots.

 

However, the music in the final mothership scene was truly magnificent. My favourite sound is the "white-key" cluster which plays when we see the ship rotating above the arena. I never heard an orchestra play a cluster like that before, it's unforgettable. I also loved the short musical moment which plays when we see somebody in the control tower gazing at the spinning mothership - it sounds like a bold statement of the 'choir theme' with lots of tinkling piano at the top. It stands out very well in the film, in fact it almost reminded me of what 'alien' music might sound like.

 

But undoubtedly the highlight is the music which plays during the mothership's departure. It just fits the tone of the scene perfectly. One thing however that irked me was the very short march fragment which came in the middle. As I was watching that scene I treated the music as an accompaniment to the picture, not as an end credits track, which that march fragment seemed to suggest (though technically of course it is an end credits track). I would've just skipped that excerpt and kept the tone the same, since I felt that the march themes were more like underscores and didn't really hold their own. But this is more of a music editting quip - I have nothing bad to say about the score itself.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Great" in the context of the film. They both don't have the sort of roles that would let them give the sort of great performance that'll be remembered on its own (and I'm not saying they would have, if the roles had allowed it), but they're both spot on for the film, and great fun to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Stefancos said:

But he saw something in them

 

Remember he cast Samuel L. Jackson before Pulp Fiction made him a star

He was in a bunch of Spike Lee movies before Jurassic Park.

 

As for the others, I don't think Saving Private Ryan was what made their careers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Koray Savas said:

He was in a bunch of Spike Lee movies before Jurassic Park.

 

As for the others, I don't think Saving Private Ryan was what made their careers. 

 

I think you misread my post. That's what I meant, Spielberg movies have a lot of well-known actors who popped up in small roles before they became famous for other things. 

 

I didn't include Samuel L Jackson since I wasn't sure how famous he already was for the Spike Lee movies. I would think more than the ones I listed, but maybe not. JP was definitely pre-superstardom, of course.

 

I wouldn't say Spielberg made their careers, but since you mention it I'm sure there's some kind of correlation there with future stars who made their way into his movies early on. He has his pick of the litter down to the smallest roles so whoever he and his casting directors spot are bound to have potential, plus no doubt it's a professional leg-up to be able to put one of his films on the resume. Especially the younger ones who are just trying to get seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Koray Savas said:

Yeah but half of those were just tiny roles in Saving Private Ryan.

 

True. Doubtful Vin Diesel got his role in The Fast and the Furious because of Ryan, or that Fillion would become a cult favorite with "Firefly" and "Castle".

 

I'd wish Spielberg would work with them in a bigger capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gross in what way? 

 

Back in September I said, "The Visit, M. Knight Shyamalan's "return to form". It wasn't great and it wasn't awful either but somewhere happily in between. At last we have progress. Funny how a piggy bank sized budget can bring out the best in creative sorts."

 

I quite liked it, but saw no Stanley Kubrick in there. The performances weren't anywhere near exhausted enough. It was very much a Shyamalan movie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear a lot of people have a problem with the funny side of the movie. They wanted it to be dead serious or else it's not creepy. Strange, because the grandma really spooked the bejesus out of me. I even was laughing in the hope I would recover, that's how creepy it was.

 

 

Alex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Drax said:

Oh come on, have you seen it? The scenes involving 

  Hide contents

Fake grandma's naked scenes and fake grandpa's poopy nappies and rubbing them over the boy's face were revolting!

 

 

Yeah that was quite good, heh. Unusually for a Shyamalan movie there was a distinct lack of earnest, which is probably why I didn't think it was just more rubbish from him. He's quite witty in this, which was new I think. It's all pretty light and throwaway, though. Which is another indication he's improved. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Quintus said:

 

Yeah that was quite good, heh. Unusually for a Shyamalan movie there was a distinct lack of earnest, which is probably why I didn't think it was just more rubbish from him. He's quite witty in this, which was new I think. It's all pretty light and throwaway, though. Which is another indication he's improved. 

 

I feel like Signs had some sly witty moments. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, TheGreyPilgrim said:

 

I feel like Signs had some sly witty moments. 

 

It did but they were more incidental. Tonally, the two movies are very different. The Visit is quite a mischievous little picture really. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pride and Prejudice (2005). LOVED IT. As usual it took me a few moments to get into the 18th-century politics, but other than that everything was perfect. And a great score, too. It's been a long time since I've been so touched by a piano performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Alexcremers said:

Me too!

 

 

No, we're not brothers! I don't like lizards or The Bold.

 

 

People are gonna want a Canon EOS now.

 

My Canon Rebel T3i has amazing picture quality, but nowhere close to EOS Cinema, Arri Alexa, CineAlta or any of the newer Red cameras.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The budget of The Visit was only $5 million and it made $97 millions in theatres alone. Conclusion: Don't give directors to much money and they start making better movies again. Remember what I said about Spielberg?

 

 

 

Alex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spielberg hasn't had a succession of god awful failures to make up for either. Should he? I don't think he should; Bridge of Spies did well and has been nominated for Academy Awards. Spielberg is quite content I think to be Hollywood's elder statesman, and why not. He's more than earned it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi

 

It's a tedious one, this film. Compared to the high pace of the other two, this one draaaaaags its feet for ages. It takes only a few risks (I guess filling Jabba's palace with muppets could be commendable) and squanders all the great promise Episode V left us with. There's some redeeming elements to this film, but not enough to make it stand out. I guess I just don't like this one as much as the others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had the same feeling watching it straight after TESB.

 

What happened to Han and Leia in this. So engaging and charismatic in Empire. Dull as ditchwater in this? 

Han has gone from a scoundrel to a insecure jealous prig, and Leia, who used to be sassy and outspoken doesn't actually have any character here at all.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richard Marquand seemingly directed every actor to say almost all there lines in a s l o w and unexcited manner for some reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much better would things be if the creative team of Empire came back to do Jedi themselves without Lucas's involvement?  Would have been one hell of a final chapter, I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.