Jump to content

Are There Any Film Composers Working Who Can’t Read/Write Music?


Mr. Gitz

Recommended Posts

This questions answer has many levels.

 

With the basic knowlege, that there are 12 notes in an octave and how they are named and a notation software you can write notes.

But who can write notes just with paper and pencil and piano?

 

And I guess, each of the menitioned composers can read notes. But who of them can actually play pieces by directly reading from the sheet?

And who can conduct an orchestra?

 

And knowing notes and reading notes is one thing. Knowing all the additional signatures for expression, how to play, how to phrase etc. is much much more.

 

So, I guess, there are many different levels of skills out there with people who create film music.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Edmilson said:

I remember reading somewhere that Hans Zimmer couldn't read music... But that probably was just his haters. I mean, one of his cues is named "Too Many Notes, Not Enough Rests", so he must know what a rest is and why there's too few of them, right? Right?

 

It's not his haters. Zimmer cannot read music.

Vangelis couldn't read music, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Naïve Old Fart said:

It's not his haters. Zimmer cannot read music.

 

Really? Do you have a source for that? 

 

So if I show him something like this...

 

Thinking Out Loud (Ed Sheeran) - Piano Sheet Music (PDF)

 

... and ask him to play in a piano or anything, he'll be like "duuuuhhh..."?

 

Is this why he has so many assistants? People who translate his synth demos into actual sheet music for the orchestra to perform?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Gitz said:

I can’t read/write music but I often think, damn, if there was a program that could turn my humming into notes? I’m the Mozart of humming. I came up with an awesome Batman theme once in the shower. Then I lost it. All because I can’t write music. You all have lost out on some amazing music due to my music illiteracy.

 

I've had any moments like that when a theme or melody comes into my head for a few minutes, then it's gone. I have a very basic knowledge of musical staves from school, but nothing more than knowing how notes are put on or between the lines, so if you showed me the piano sheet of a classic theme, I'd be able to mostly follow it. But come to any other aspects like temp, pitch, etc, not a clue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Naïve Old Fart said:

There are plenty of sources, on the internet. Really; it's not the Zimmer-haters saying this. He can't read music.

Neither can Paul McCartney, nor Eric Clapton.

It’s kind of a part of his self taught image, but it’s known that he reads music. He writes in Cubase but he obviously knows how to read music. A collaborator of his was once asked about it in an interview but can’t remember who it was but he set the record straight.
 

I’ve also seen multiple images of him reading and making notes with a pencil on the sheet music at recording sessions and rehearsals for the live shows.

 

Like Elfman (who was known as a whistler very early in his career if I’m not mistaken), I’m sure that when he started out he probably wasn’t very good at reading notation but that was in the 80s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Understanding musical theory is certainly not a pre-requisite for writing music and I’m sure there are several gradations of skill in the industry.

 

Somebody with an inherent and intuitive flair for music will often know principles of music theory without even realising it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather hear music from someone who doesn't really know what they're doing, theory-wise, but makes interesting and emotional music using whatever intuition they have, than someone who knows everything there is about theory (and makes academics excitedly study it) but writes music that's actually quite boring to listen to.

 

And as Zimmer has been mentioned, I've got Gladiator on now and am reminded why it's one of my top film scores of all time. I couldn't care less if the man can't read music, or not as well as fellow composers.

 

Actually, a quote comes to mind from Thomas Newman, possibly from one of those round table things, where he comments that of all the soloists he works with to produce his unusual sounds, if someone isn't very musically literate but is able to produce the sounds he wants, he's (exact words) 'grateful to have you'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As has been said - in film music at least - you have to be an adept dramatist before you're a prodigy of musical 'discipline'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Schilkeman said:

When I listen to Zimmer, I think, well, he knows what he's doing, he just doesn't know much. When I listen to Elfman, I legit don't know if he knows what he's doing. I think their lack of training is obvious, and limits their potential. But then, we have someone like Desplat who is trained, and clearly knows what he's doing, but is so boring I've fallen asleep trying to listen to his scores. I think Jerry and James and Johnny stick around because they had extensive training, and the spark of the Muse. I think you need both to be great. 

A hundred times this.

 

11 hours ago, LSH said:

Understanding musical theory is certainly not a pre-requisite for writing music and I’m sure there are several gradations of skill in the industry.

 

Somebody with an inherent and intuitive flair for music will often know principles of music theory without even realising it.

Like in other diciplines music isn't based on music theory (unless you look at something like twelve-tone music). People made music long before music theory existed. Music theory is just a construct to describe music and to define a common language for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it would be better to define what it means to "read music". I can see at least three possible definitions, corresponding to different levels of musical training (and I'm just thinking about "reading", not "writing" or "playing from a score").

 

1) Being able to identify the name of a note while reading a single staff in G clef. This is a basic ability that in some countries is taught in ordinary schools, and I will never believe that any serious professional musician is unable to do this, even if they say so themselves.

 

2) Being able to read written music on a single staff (say, a melody) and simultaneously imagining how the melody sounds, at least in terms of relative heights of the notes; possibly, being able to sing a previously unknown melody while reading it for the first time. This is a slightly more advanced ability, which requires a few years of musical training, and dedicated practice. Where I live, in the context of a formal musical education path, you are typically required to display such ability within the second year, and you must give an exam where said ability is tested (along with others) at the end of the third year. I can well imagine that the Beatles might not be able to do this, but I find it difficult to believe that people like Zimmer, Elfman etc. - who, after all, often deal with written music and musicians who play their compositions - cannot do it.

 

3) Being able to read a full multi-instrumental score (many staves aligned vertically, corresponding to different instruments playing simultaneously) of moderate complexity and simultaneously imagine how it sounds, at least in relative terms. This requires several years of training and practice specifically oriented to achieve this goal; it is the bread and butter of orchestra conductors, of those composers who write everything by themselves, and of orchestrators. So, John Williams, Jerry Goldsmith, Ennio Morricone, Bernard Herrmann etc. etc. etc. are/were able to do it; people like Zimmer and Vangelis most likely not.   

 

 

 

9 hours ago, GerateWohl said:

Like in other diciplines music isn't based on music theory (unless you look at something like twelve-tone music). People made music long before music theory existed. Music theory is just a construct to describe music and to define a common language for it. 

 

I have to disagree with this. Most of the music that most of us love would not exist without music theory; including that of John Williams. Of course, music theory evolved in time, and today's theory is different, say, from that of Mozart's times.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Score said:

I have to disagree with this. Most of the music that most of us love would not exist without music theory; including that of John Williams. Of course, music theory evolved in time, and today's theory is different, say, from that of Mozart's times.

To be honest, I don't see a contradiction two what I wrote. But your comment is a good addition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Edmilson said:

That would be Brian Tyler, who's got a bachelor and a masters degree in music and yet his music is okay at best.

 

I like a handful of his scores the Yellowstone and 1883 shows, some of Terra Nova, and The Mummy and bits of Fast Five. That's about it. He does have a very, very generic sound and I definitely don't think he's talented at complex, memorable themes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Mummy was okay, even though the album was extremely long. This year's Super Mario Bros was funny. Overall I think his most entertaining action score is 2014 TMNT. 

 

Never connected to his F&F scores though despite a handful of decent cues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/12/2023 at 11:56 PM, Richard Penna said:

I'd rather hear music from someone who doesn't really know what they're doing, theory-wise, but makes interesting and emotional music using whatever intuition they have, than someone who knows everything there is about theory (and makes academics excitedly study it) but writes music that's actually quite boring to listen to.

True. It's basically knowledge vs. talent. Or knowing the craft vs. being a genius. 

There are many people who can learn to draw or paint or read and write music, the technical aspects of it, but will never in their life be able to compose one hummable melody, simply because they aren't truly talented. One can learn the craft but that alone won't make them great composers without that certain je ne sais quoi. 

Look how many film composers are out there, but how many have written a theme that people remember and hum? 

That is why JW is the greatest film composer of all time. He has written more memorable themes than almost all of the other film composers combined. Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Jaws, Close Encounters, E. T., Jurassic Park, Home Alone, Schindler's List, and the list goes on and on. 

If it were only about knowing musical theory, every composer would be Williams. But the real talent is when you put together a certain amount of notes in a way that will become instantly recognizable as if they were always there. That's probably the hardest part for a composer, and it certainly is for Williams as he has said it many times. Making something very hard seem easy is real talent.

 

 

1 hour ago, Edmilson said:

Overall I think his most entertaining action score is 2014 TMNT. 

 

I've read somewhere that it's basically a copy paste of his Thor: The Dark World score. Don't know if it's true, I'm not familiar with either score.

I remember enjoying his Eagle Eye score, though. The guy loves drums. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, JTW said:

've read somewhere that it's basically a copy paste of his Thor: The Dark World score. Don't know if it's true, I'm not familiar with either scor

These two scores are nothing alike. Thor TDW is more noble and epic while TMNT is more balls to the wall and explosive fun. Both contain a lot of Tyler-isms though.

 

If you feel inclined, just try these two cues below:

 

You can skip this one to 2:50, it's when it gets really entertaining:

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/12/2023 at 5:29 PM, Edmilson said:

That would be Brian Tyler, who's got a bachelor and a masters degree in music and yet his music is okay at best.

He’s good when he tries! He just rarely tries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Edmilson said:

These two scores are nothing alike. Thor TDW is more noble and epic while TMNT is more balls to the wall and explosive fun. Both contain a lot of Tyler-isms though.

 

If you feel inclined, just try these two cues below:

 

You can skip this one to 2:50, it's when it gets really entertaining:

 

 

 

You don’t need a degree in music theory to write any of the music heard in these two clips. 

By the way, two more ingrediences are part of Williams' compositional brillance. He is a very good performer and improvisor at the piano. That gives him the abbility to instantly try out and vary complex ideas. So, he is able to develop things further where technically less skilled performers already stop developing their music. Secondly his experience and knowlege of jazz and classical music. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Jurassic Shark said:

 

Daft Punk consisted of two guys, and they worked with Joseph Trapanese who did the orchestral arrangements. 

 

Also, Bangalter has some classical training (don't know about Homem-Christo). Wiki:

 

Quote

He began playing the piano at the age of 6,[6] taking lessons from a music staff member of the Paris Opera.[7]

 

His concert work MYTHOLOGIES from last year is well worth checking out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, JTW said:

That is why JW is the greatest film composer of all time. He has written more memorable themes than almost all of the other film composers combined. Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Jaws, Close Encounters, E. T., Jurassic Park, Home Alone, Schindler's List, and the list goes on and on. 

 

He may have been amongst the best during his peak period of the 80s to the 00s, but in terms of my criteria of writing interesting music I think that's mixed during the last couple of decades. There are many composers who have produced scores that I find more interesting, in the latter period, regardless of their musical acumen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael Dell, Steve Jobs, Walt Disney, Bill Gates, Richard Branson, Mark Zuckerbeg are self-made billionaires who never got their college degrees.  Some successful composers don't read music.  They hire teams of musicians to make up for what they don't know but can be very good at what they do.  Some that are very good at reading and writing music are John Powell, James Horner, Goldsmith, Goldenthal, james newton howard, etc.  They have large teams too but usually more in the production side.  Basically, hiring whatever your weakness is to maintain high standard, polished, consistent output.

 

On 13/12/2023 at 9:12 AM, Naïve Old Fart said:

 

It's not his haters. Zimmer cannot read music.

Vangelis couldn't read music, either.

 

Zimmer brags about not reading music.  He says it in his masterclass.  He dropped out of piano lessons two weeks in too, being way too bored with playing scales rather than tunes.  The Beatles couldn't read music either.  George Harrison talked about not reading it on The Dick Clark show where he said he doesn't need to.  He writes the chord symbols and lyrics and that was all he needed.  They don't see it as a handicap.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, karelm said:

Michael Dell, Steve Jobs, Walt Disney, Bill Gates, Richard Branson, Mark Zuckerbeg are self-made billionaires who never got their college degrees.  Some successful composers don't read music.  They hire teams of musicians to make up for what they don't know but can be very good at what they do.  

 

Zimmer brags about not reading music.  He says it in his masterclass.  He dropped out of piano lessons two weeks in too, being way too bored with playing scales rather than tunes.  The Beatles couldn't read music either.  George Harrison talked about not reading it on The Dick Clark show where he said he doesn't need to.  He writes the chord symbols and lyrics and that was all he needed.  They don't see it as a handicap.  

The lesson here is: "don't worry, kids! You don't need to go to school! Why spend all those boring hours learning about mitochondrias, logarithms and sexual escapades of Henry VIII, then go home and, instead of having fun, just studying even more for the hellish tests you'll face on the other day? Why go to expensive colleges filled with even more boring tests, presentations, academic essays, etc., which, given the current economic situation, won't even guarantee a nice, steady job? All you need is to be a self made billionaire with a knack for business (and for fucking the competition)!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread depresses me. I studied musical theory and piano for eight years at school and yet couldn't sight-read to save my life. I had to learn pieces through constant repetition. Music is one of the great joys of my life and yet I can't compose or play a thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, JTWfan77 said:

This thread depresses me. I studied musical theory and piano for eight years at school and yet couldn't sight-read to save my life. I had to learn pieces through constant repetition. Music is one of the great joys of my life and yet I can't compose or play a thing.

 

This is sad to read because I think there are some who believe that because you have trouble reading music, anything you would produce is going to be inferior to those who can because you can't do it 'properly'. And I'm passionately against that view - as I touched upon previously if someone has some great melodies, ideas for textures, action sequences, etc, but doesn't have a clue what that translates to in musical terms.... I couldn't give less of a shit if they are still able to somehow get their thoughts down. Talents come in so many forms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JTWfan77 said:

This thread depresses me. I studied musical theory and piano for eight years at school and yet couldn't sight-read to save my life. I had to learn pieces through constant repetition. Music is one of the great joys of my life and yet I can't compose or play a thing.

There is a good way out of this. At least for some time you should try to go more into the direction of improvisation. For an easy start you could use some blues patterns. If the notes refuse to be read by you, ignore them and do your own thing. Just a suggestion. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jurassic Shark said:

 

Don't be so hard to yourself. Reading music and sight-reading are two different leagues. Especially, if you're playing an instrument that requires sorting out fingering, there's a large gap between reading and sight-reading. You can still be a good instrumentalists without being able to sight-read. 

 

oh yeah good sight reading on some instruments seems like hell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JTWfan77 said:

This thread depresses me. I studied musical theory and piano for eight years at school and yet couldn't sight-read to save my life. I had to learn pieces through constant repetition. Music is one of the great joys of my life and yet I can't compose or play a thing.

Hey, what’s the worst thing that could happen? You won’t be a session musician on JW scores. ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.